This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 16 Oct 2018, 12:02 GMT

K Line predicts deeper losses on higher bunker prices


Projected FY loss is more than three times higher than the amount forecast in July.


K Line's car carrier vessel, the Hawaiian Highway.
Image credit: K Line
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) reports that it has revised its financial results forecast for the first half of the year (April to September 2018) and the full year (April 2018 to March 2019).

The Japanese shipper said the forecast had been revised due to the expected negative impact of recent increases in the price of bunker fuel, in addition to a decrease in operational productivity and the impact from Ocean Network Express Holdings, Ltd. (ONE) - a company jointly owned by K Line with Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) and Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK Line).

K Line now expects to post a H1 loss of JPY 26,500m ($236.5m) instead of the JPY 15,000m ($133.9m) previously forecast at the end of July - a 43.4 percent increase.

And the full year prediction is now more than three times higher than two-and-a-half months ago at JPY 21,000m ($187.4m), up from JPY 7,000m ($62.5m).

Average bunker price

The average bunker price K Line paid during the first fiscal quarter (Q1), which runs between April and June, rose year-on-year (YoY) by $88, or 27.0 percent, to $414 per metric tonne.

As a result, K Line revised its Q2 bunker price forecast in July upwards to $468 per tonne, and upped its H1 prediction to $441 per tonne, from its $376 projected price in April.

The H2 forecast in July was $91 higher than in April at $460 per tonne; whilst the full-year average estimate was adjusted to $451 per tonne - $78 more than the previous forecast.

As previously reported, ONE revised its full-year average bunker price forecast on Tuesday to $451 per tonne, which is $3 lower than July's price prediction.

And for H1, the revised average bunker price is $6 lower than July at $434 per tonne.

MOL   Japan 

Caspar Gooren, Titan. Titan Clean Fuels signs e-methane supply deal with TURN2X for 2028 delivery  

Bunker supplier to receive e-methane from Spanish production plant for distribution across European ports.

Hydrogen-fuelled engine 6UEC35LSGH. Japan consortium achieves hydrogen co-firing in main engine for large commercial vessel  

Engine reaches over 95% hydrogen co-firing ratio, with installation planned for 2027.

BTB bunker truck. Belgian Trading & Bunkering expands DMA 0.89 truck deliveries in ARA region  

BTB extends marine fuel offerings with truck-based deliveries to meet maritime market demand.

Fuel pathway roundtable meeting participants. ABS convenes roundtable on offshore power barge for Great Lakes emissions reduction  

Meeting brought together ports, academia and industry to advance shore power solution under EPA programme.

Lego Ane Maersk video screenshot. Maersk marks 50-year Lego partnership with dual-fuel vessel model  

Shipping company displays an exhibition of Lego sets spanning five decades at Copenhagen headquarters.

Guo Yun Hai vessel. Cosco Shipping takes delivery of 80,000-dwt methanol-ready grain carrier  

Guo Yun Hai features box-shaped cargo hold and methanol-ready design with energy-saving devices.

CMA CGM Innovation ship-to-ship transfer. Algeciras reports record LNG bunkering volumes, claims European top-three position  

Spanish port says it supplied 333,833 cbm of LNG across 78 ship-to-ship operations in 2025.

Additional costs chart. T&E: Iran conflict costing shipping industry €340m a day in fuel costs  

Transport & Environment analysis shows marine fuel price surge has cost the industry €4.6bn since conflict began.

CF 3850 vessel render. Damen delivers second hybrid-ready combi freighter to German shipowner  

The vessel features biofuel capability and will be retrofitted with wind-assist technology with government funding.

Engine retrofit report 2026 graphic. Retrofit capability expands as regulatory uncertainty slows alternative-fuel conversions  

Lloyd’s Register warns delayed conversions could compress demand into a narrower, costlier timeframe as the fleet ages.


↑  Back to Top