This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 16 Oct 2018, 12:02 GMT

K Line predicts deeper losses on higher bunker prices


Projected FY loss is more than three times higher than the amount forecast in July.


K Line's car carrier vessel, the Hawaiian Highway.
Image credit: K Line
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) reports that it has revised its financial results forecast for the first half of the year (April to September 2018) and the full year (April 2018 to March 2019).

The Japanese shipper said the forecast had been revised due to the expected negative impact of recent increases in the price of bunker fuel, in addition to a decrease in operational productivity and the impact from Ocean Network Express Holdings, Ltd. (ONE) - a company jointly owned by K Line with Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) and Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK Line).

K Line now expects to post a H1 loss of JPY 26,500m ($236.5m) instead of the JPY 15,000m ($133.9m) previously forecast at the end of July - a 43.4 percent increase.

And the full year prediction is now more than three times higher than two-and-a-half months ago at JPY 21,000m ($187.4m), up from JPY 7,000m ($62.5m).

Average bunker price

The average bunker price K Line paid during the first fiscal quarter (Q1), which runs between April and June, rose year-on-year (YoY) by $88, or 27.0 percent, to $414 per metric tonne.

As a result, K Line revised its Q2 bunker price forecast in July upwards to $468 per tonne, and upped its H1 prediction to $441 per tonne, from its $376 projected price in April.

The H2 forecast in July was $91 higher than in April at $460 per tonne; whilst the full-year average estimate was adjusted to $451 per tonne - $78 more than the previous forecast.

As previously reported, ONE revised its full-year average bunker price forecast on Tuesday to $451 per tonne, which is $3 lower than July's price prediction.

And for H1, the revised average bunker price is $6 lower than July at $434 per tonne.

MOL   Japan 

Container ship at harbour. Skuld warns of unusual chemical compounds in Southeast Asian marine fuels  

Marine insurer reports fuels meeting ISO 8217 standards but containing high levels of hydrocarbon compounds.

Arsenio Dominguez, IMO. IMO chief urges progress on net-zero framework amid Hormuz crisis  

Arsenio Dominguez calls for constructive dialogue as MEPC 84 tackles greenhouse gas measures and ballast water regulations.

Monjasa Shaker vessel. Monjasa reflags UAE-based tankers to Emirates registry  

Marine fuels supplier transitions first of three vessels from Liberian to UAE flag.

Ammonia bunkering at Port of Ulsan. Lotte Fine Chemical completes world’s first commercial ammonia bunkering at Ulsan  

South Korean chemical company claims to have established a complete green ammonia value chain.

London skyline. Propeller Fuels seeks bunker trader for London office  

Marine fuel supplier advertises for trader to manage procurement, sales and client relationships.

Windward Hamburg vessel. Fincantieri’s VARD launches first of four offshore wind vessels for Windward Offshore  

VARD 4 19 design vessel features battery hybrid propulsion and green methanol preparation.

Singapore Maritime Week panel session. Singapore industry leaders call for regulatory clarity on maritime energy transition  

SSA councillors highlight need for government support and clear policies to enable alternative fuel adoption.

Aerial view of container vessel at sea. Seaspan and Technolog unveil LNG feeder design with four-week ammonia conversion pathway  

Lloyd’s Register grants approval for a 3,370 TEU vessel concept designed for swift transition to zero-carbon fuel.

David Foo, MPA. Singapore’s MPA backs LNG as part of multi-fuel strategy for shipping decarbonisation  

Authority emphasises regulatory frameworks and workforce development as sector navigates geopolitical uncertainty and energy transition.

ABS and PIL sign MoU. ABS and PIL partner on book-and-claim emissions verification  

Classification society to verify fuel consumption and emissions data for shipping line’s alternative fuel claims.


↑  Back to Top