This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 19 Jun 2018, 07:46 GMT

How to prevent bunker spills: North P&I


P&I club lists the main causes of bunker spills and how they can be avoided.


Image credit: North of England P&I Club
North of England P&I Club (North P&I) has issued an overview of the main causes of bunker spills and how they can be avoided.

The marine insurance provider notes that the environmental impact of spilled heavy fuel oil (HFO) can be more severe than a crude oil cargo - whilst lighter fractions of crude can evaporate, residual fuels will not and are therefore described as 'persistent'.

And whilst the release of fuel oil can occur if a tank is breached - due to a collision or impact with a fixed or floating object (FFO) - North P&I notes that many bunker spills take place during bunkering operations and that the "vast majority" of them can be avoided.

Many bunker spills occur when a fuel tank overflows during the bunkering process, North P&I explains. A ship's storage tanks will be designed to overflow into the designated overflow tank and if the overflow tank fills completely, the fuel spills out of the tank vent head, onto the deck and into the water.

Overflow tanks can also fill up when the bunker manifold is over-pressurised and the system's safety valve relieves the pressure into the overflow tank.

North P&I lists the main causes of bunker spills as being:

- Not acting on overflow alarms

Overflow tanks are fitted with float alarms that activate when a set level is reached. These are usually positioned quite low in the tank to allow plenty of time for the engineers to act. On some vessels, a flow switch is fitted to the manifold safety valve drain line, which activates an alarm if flow is detected. In some incidents, overflow alarms have activated but the crew did not take immediate action to investigate.

- Overflow alarms not fitted or not working

There is no statutory requirement to fit alarms to the overflow system and in such cases crew vigilance and suitable monitoring of the overflow tank contents is vital. For those vessels fitted with such alarms, it is important that they are periodically tested to ensure that they will provide the all-important early warning when it really matters.

- Failure to monitor bunker tank levels

The crew must not rely on tank high level alarms and overflow alarms during bunkering. The tank levels must be monitored throughout, paying particular attention when tanks are almost full and changing over to new tanks. If the wrong valve is accidentally operated, a tank level could rise and overflow unless detected and corrected by a vigilant engineer.

- No effective watch at the bunker station

The bunker station should be manned during the bunkering operation. This not only provides visual monitoring and checking for pollution, but is also an important means of communicating with the supplying vessel or barge.

- Communication between bunker barge and receiving vessel

There must be a means of communication between the supplying and receiving vessels' personnel at all times. If a problem occurs that requires an emergency stop of the transfer, the two vessels must be able to communicate immediately. It is good practice to test these communication channels prior to commencing operations.

- Not following procedures or the bunker checklist

A vessel's bunker checklist can be lengthy and there may be a temptation to bypass some of the instructions to speed up the process. This can have costly consequences. Shipowners should ensure that the checklist and supporting policies and procedures are sensible and workable. The vessel's crew must appreciate the importance of the procedures and understand their purpose.

- Supplier exceeding maximum pressure or flow rate

Before bunkering commences, the supplying and receiving vessel must agree a maximum transfer rate and a maximum pumping pressure. There have been instances where the supplier has attempted to exceed these limits to speed up the transfer and has resulted in overflow.

- Defects to bunker piping or tanks

Less common are spills caused by defects to the bunker piping or tanks. Bunker system pipework, fittings and vents that are poorly maintained or neglected can fail in service. Implementing and following a sensible but robust planned maintenance program will prevent the bunker system failing into such a dangerous condition.


A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd suspend Strait of Hormuz transits amid Middle East security crisis  

Container carriers reroute services around the Cape of Good Hope as military conflict escalates.

Map of Middle East. Operations continue as normal at most Middle East ports  

Most facilities operating normally, with exceptions in Oman and Saudi Arabia.

Photograph of the 93,000-cbm very large ammonia carrier (VLAC) Gaz Ronin. Naftomar takes delivery of 93,000-cbm dual-fuel ammonia carrier  

Gaz Ronin features a MAN dual-fuel engine with high-pressure selective catalytic reduction technology.

Aurora Botnia leaving harbor. AYK Energy completes world’s largest marine battery retrofit on Wasaline ferry  

Aurora Botnia receives 10.4 MWh battery system, bringing total capacity to 12.6 MWh.

Steel cutting ceremony for an LNG dual-fuel 307,000-tonne crude oil tanker with builder's hull no. 113. Dalian Shipbuilding begins construction on LNG dual-fuel crude tanker  

Development is one of a number of milestones reported by parent company over the past few days.

Photograph of Sallaum Lines' Ocean Breeze vessel with 'Introducing The Blue Corridor' overlaid text. Sallaum Lines launches Blue Corridor sustainability initiative for Europe–Africa ro-ro trade  

Company deploys LNG-capable vessels with AI routing and eco-speed protocols on new green shipping corridor.

The platform supply vessel Viking Energy. Eidesvik Offshore signs yard contract for ammonia retrofit of PSV Viking Energy  

Halsnøy Dokk to convert platform supply vessel as part of EU-backed Apollo project.

Vanquish tanker alongside Jette Theresa oil/chemical tanker docked at terminal. North Sea Port completes risk analysis for alternative fuel bunkering operations  

Port authority says LNG, hydrogen, methanol and ammonia can be safely refuelled across its facilities.

Container ship near a port. Ammonia emerges as most feasible alternative fuel for deep-sea shipping in 2050 emissions study  

Research combining expert survey and technical analysis ranks ammonia ahead of hydrogen and methanol.

Cargo vessel at sea. EMSA study examines biodiesel blend spill response as shipping adopts alternative fuels  

Research addresses knowledge gaps on biodiesel-conventional fuel blends as marine pollutants and response measures.


↑  Back to Top