This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Fri 1 Jun 2018, 10:44 GMT

Verifavia warns against 'overcomplicating' EU MRV and IMO DCS regulations


Existing laws are 'relatively straightforward', with only 'minor differences' between both systems, firm says.


Julien Dufour, CEO of Verifavia Shipping.
Image credit: Verifavia
Verifavia, an emissions verification company for the transport sector, has warned against "overcomplicating" the European Union's Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (EU MRV) and the International Maritime Organisation's Data Collection System (IMO DCS) regulations.

The company has highlighted what it refers to as "a common and unhelpful misconception" that data must be submitted to the verifier in a certain format, pointing out that if the content is complete and compliant with the requirements of the regulations, it can be submitted in any format - from simple spreadsheets (i.e. xlsx, csv, etc.) to advanced markup language format (e.g. xml), or more complex formats used in IT systems for monitoring vessel performance.

"The verifier can then extract the data as necessary to proceed with the verification process. This gives the shipowner / operator total flexibility and places the onus on the verifier to perform its role," Verifavia explained.

Julien Dufour, CEO, Verifavia Shipping, commented: "The EU MRV and IMO DCS regulations are now both in force but continue to perplex shipowners and operators. These regulations are relatively straightforward and the industry is overcomplicating its response to meeting requirements.

Verifavia argues that when the data required for EU MRV has been collated, IMO DCS compliance is "straightforward" as it follows a similar process.

Whilst the EU MRV has 37 items on its template of requirements, the IMO DCS template has nine. And Verifavia suggests that despite there being some "minor differences" between the two systems, "the same methodologies are acceptable for both regulations".

"The IMO DCS largely flows from the EU MRV and the reality is that if shipowners comply with EU MRV, they are also likely to comply with the IMO DCS. If the content submitted to the verifier is correct, the format of the data is largely irrelevant," Dufour said.

EU MRV

The EU MRV regulation requires shipowners and operators to monitor, report and verify CO2 emissions from their vessels calling at EU ports. Adopted in 2015, the regulation concerns CO2 emissions released for voyages that either start or end in the port of an EU Member State, voyages between EU ports and periods at berth in EU ports.

Shipping companies with vessels of 5,000 gross tonnage (GT) and above operating within the EU must prepare plans to monitor and report their carbon emissions, fuel consumption, distance sailed, time at sea, and associated transport work.

A Monitoring Plan must be prepared for each applicable vessel. Each plan is subject to verification and must be submitted to an independent and accredited verifier.

The deadline for Monitoring Plan assessment was December 31, 2017, and the initial reporting period commenced on January 1, 2018.

IMO DCS

In April 2015, the IMO's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) agreed mandatory requirements for ships to record and report data on their fuel consumption, distance sailed, and hours underway.

At the 70th meeting in October 2016, it was decided that these requirements would be adopted as modifications to MARPOL Annex VI.

The IMO fuel oil consumption data collection system (IMO DCS) became effective on March 1, 2018, requiring ships of 5,000 GT and above to submit to their Administration annual reports on fuel oil consumption. The first reporting period starts on January 1, 2019.

Ship owners and operators are required to update their existing Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) to document the methodology that will be used to collect the required data and the processes that will be used to report the data. They will need to have a documented plan in place to monitor CO2 emissions by the start of next year.

The IMO has a data collection system roadmap through to 2023 which is focused on developing a comprehensive strategy for the reduction of GHG emissions from shipping.


A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd suspend Strait of Hormuz transits amid Middle East security crisis  

Container carriers reroute services around the Cape of Good Hope as military conflict escalates.

Map of Middle East. Operations continue as normal at most Middle East ports  

Most facilities operating normally, with exceptions in Oman and Saudi Arabia.

Photograph of the 93,000-cbm very large ammonia carrier (VLAC) Gaz Ronin. Naftomar takes delivery of 93,000-cbm dual-fuel ammonia carrier  

Gaz Ronin features a MAN dual-fuel engine with high-pressure selective catalytic reduction technology.

Aurora Botnia leaving harbor. AYK Energy completes world’s largest marine battery retrofit on Wasaline ferry  

Aurora Botnia receives 10.4 MWh battery system, bringing total capacity to 12.6 MWh.

Steel cutting ceremony for an LNG dual-fuel 307,000-tonne crude oil tanker with builder's hull no. 113. Dalian Shipbuilding begins construction on LNG dual-fuel crude tanker  

Development is one of a number of milestones reported by parent company over the past few days.

Photograph of Sallaum Lines' Ocean Breeze vessel with 'Introducing The Blue Corridor' overlaid text. Sallaum Lines launches Blue Corridor sustainability initiative for Europe–Africa ro-ro trade  

Company deploys LNG-capable vessels with AI routing and eco-speed protocols on new green shipping corridor.

The platform supply vessel Viking Energy. Eidesvik Offshore signs yard contract for ammonia retrofit of PSV Viking Energy  

Halsnøy Dokk to convert platform supply vessel as part of EU-backed Apollo project.

Vanquish tanker alongside Jette Theresa oil/chemical tanker docked at terminal. North Sea Port completes risk analysis for alternative fuel bunkering operations  

Port authority says LNG, hydrogen, methanol and ammonia can be safely refuelled across its facilities.

Container ship near a port. Ammonia emerges as most feasible alternative fuel for deep-sea shipping in 2050 emissions study  

Research combining expert survey and technical analysis ranks ammonia ahead of hydrogen and methanol.

Cargo vessel at sea. EMSA study examines biodiesel blend spill response as shipping adopts alternative fuels  

Research addresses knowledge gaps on biodiesel-conventional fuel blends as marine pollutants and response measures.


↑  Back to Top