This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 31 Jan 2018, 12:05 GMT

MOL sees average bunker price jump 23% in Q3


Japanese shipowner paid an average $376 per tonne in the third fiscal quarter.



Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) reports that the average bunker price paid by its fleet of vessels during the third quarter (Q3) of the current fiscal year rose by more than $70 per tonne compared to the same period 12 months earlier.

Between October and December, MOL paid an average of $376 per tonne, which was an increase of $71, or 23.3 percent, on the $305-per-tonne figure recorded during the corresponding period in 2016.

For the first nine months (April 1 to December 31), meanwhile, MOL's average bunker price rose by $76, or 28.7 percent, to $341 per tonne, up from $265 per tonne the year before.

Forecast

In its Q4 forecast, the Japanese firm predicts that its average bunker price will be $380 per tonne, which would be a year-on-year (YoY) increase of $41, or 12.1 percent.

MOL's prediction for the second half (H2) of 2017 is $378 per tonne, which would represent a YoY rise of $57, or 17.8 percent.

In its full-year outlook, MOL forecasts the average bunker price will reach $351 per tonne, which is $15 higher than the company's previous forecast of $336 per tonne and is $67, or 23.6 percent, above the $284-per-tonne average bunker price recorded in fiscal year 2016.

H1, Q1, Q2

MOL previously announced last year that its average bunker price in H1 rose YoY by $81, or 33.6 percent, to $322 per tonne.

In Q2, MOL paid an average of $325 per tonne - a YoY jump of $68, or 26.5 percent.

MOL's average bunker price in Q1 was $319 per tonne, which was a YoY increase of $93, or 41.2 percent.

Results

In its overall results for Q3, MOL posted a net income of JPY 16.1 billion ($148 million) compared to JPY 2.9 billion last year.

For the nine-month period between April and December, MOL's net income was JPY 29.2 billion - a YoY improvement of JPY 10.2 billion, or 53.7 percent.

MOL   Japan 

Rolls-Royce mtu engine test bench. Rolls-Royce Power Systems switches German engine test facilities to HVO fuel  

Company saved 3,200 tonnes of CO2 by end of 2025 after switching to renewable diesel.

MSC Migsan delivery ceremony. Changhong International delivers final LNG dual-fuel container ship 205 days early  

Chinese shipbuilder completes 10-vessel series for MSC with delivery of 11,500-teu MSC Migsan.

Seoul city skyline. Oilmar seeks senior and mid-level bunker traders in Seoul  

Marine fuel firm aims to recruit experienced traders for South Korean operations.

Morten Thomas Jacobsen, GEA. Global Ethanol Association to present on ethanol marine fuel at London shipping expo  

Morten Thomas Jacobsen will discuss ethanol fuel trials and maritime decarbonisation challenges in June.

Adrian Tolson, IBIA. IBIA warns of structural shift in marine fuel market following Middle East tensions  

Association chair says geopolitical disruptions signal lasting changes to bunker supply dynamics and pricing.

HMM Hamburg vessel. Rotterdam bunker volumes plunge 25% in first quarter amid regulatory shifts  

Fossil fuel sales decline sharply while alternative fuels show modest growth in Dutch port.

Camellia Dream vessel. Norsepower completes factory tests for 18 rotor sails bound for Airbus fleet  

Wind propulsion units cleared for installation on LD Armateurs vessels targeting 50% emissions reduction.

Frankie Russ vessel. Ernst Russ acquires four chemical tankers with five-year charters worth $126m  

Hamburg shipowner enters tanker segment with methanol-ready newbuildings delivering from Q4 2026.

Ammonia fuel system component. Wärtsilä boosts ammonia engine power output to match LNG equivalent  

Finnish technology group raises Wärtsilä 25 Ammonia engine output, enabling simpler vessel designs.

Aerial view of a cruiseship at sea. Fincantieri secures order for three LNG-fuelled cruise ships from Princess Cruises  

Italian shipbuilder to construct vessels at Monfalcone yard, with deliveries scheduled through 2039.


↑  Back to Top