This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 17 Jul 2018, 05:17 GMT

Sulphur 2020: Papering over the cracks


Fourth article in series by FIS's Chris Hudson looks at developments in the paper market with respect to the 2020 sulphur cap.


Chris Hudson, Fuel Oil & Tanker FFA Broker at Freight Investor Services (FIS).
Image credit: Freight Investor Services (FIS)
In the last of our series of articles on the 2020 sulphur cap, we will look at developments in the paper market. The changes in the physical grades and flow will, of course, cause a necessary change in all the associated industries from port infrastructure to insurance. At FIS our speciality is fuel oil hedging solutions for end user clients, so we will take a look at the developing paper market with respect to the low sulphur fuel switchover and what options these end users have.

I think it is fair to say that there is currently no perfect hedge for potential 2020 fuel risk, with the exception of continuing to use high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) on scrubber-fitted vessels.

For operators planning on using HSFO, the tried and trusted HSFO derivatives contract will give the perfect solution for being able to guarantee the costs of the fuel well into 2020. Currently everyone dislikes you, but at least you're sorted.

For the majority of people, their solution for the new IMO regulations will be using a blended 0.5% fuel oil, for which currently there are no direct equivalent paper contracts. To do so presents a choice for those who are looking to mitigate their fuel price risk in upcoming years. But, like squeezing into that pair of jeans from your 20s, those looking to hedge immediately will need to consider some slightly ill-fitting proxy trades.

For a proxy hedge, most counterparties have looked at a lower-sulphur-content fuel such as the gasoil contracts in Rotterdam and Singapore respectively. The two most used contracts are the Rotterdam 0.1% Gasoil and the Singapore Gasoil 10ppm contracts, making them overly compliant; but they are liquid, correlated, and tradeable today. You'll have to pay a pretty penny in premiums over both HSFO and the expected cost of 0.5% LSFO, but at least you will be able to sleep soundly at night knowing your hedge is on and working.

If you are able to sit on your hands for a few more months (which I suspect will be the position of the majority), then there will be specific 0.5% contracts coming into existence at the start of next year. Platts proposes to begin publishing new price assessments for RMG 380 CST marine fuel cargoes with a maximum sulphur limit of 0.5%, for loading in Singapore, Fujairah and Houston, and barges in Rotterdam, starting January 2, 2019.

And like the world's best pick 'n' mix for traders, there will also be the corresponding spreads between the current high-sulphur and these new low-sulphur contracts. The FIS contact details are the bottom of this article, so do get in touch to get set up to hit the ground hedging once these new contracts are operational.

With this in mind, there a several ways to approach hedging exposure: proxy gasoil trades; wait and directly hedge the 0.5% contract; hedge the HSFO contract now and then use the spread to roll it into ULSFO contract when it is introduced.

Each solution is specific to each client and the level of risk or premium they are happy to accept, but at least there are some options available, and operators do not just have to accept whatever costs the 2020 changes throw at them.

As a specialist broker of fuel oil derivatives - as well as wet and dry forward freight agreements - at FIS we have the expertise to help devise and execute whatever hedging strategy works best to keep you ahead of the pack for the 2020 switchover.

ULSFO  

Capital's LNG-powered vessel. Chinese shipbuilder delivers 155,500-dwt LNG dual-fuel crude oil tanker  

Vessel handed over to Capital Ship Management Corp in China.

Glovis Lighthouse vessel. Seaspan takes delivery of first 10,800-ceu dual-fuel LNG car carrier  

Glovis Lighthouse enters service as one of a handful of vessels globally to exceed 10,000 CEU capacity.

Port of Rotterdam, Maersk, Core Power and Lloyd's Register logos. Rotterdam study maps pathway for nuclear-powered commercial ship port calls  

A joint study by Lloyd's Register, the Port of Rotterdam, Core Power and Maersk examines the feasibility of nuclear vessel port calls.

Hakata waterfront. Kinkai Yusen conducts first biofuel demonstration on domestic ro-ro vessel at Hakata Port  

Japanese shipping company to trial B24 biofuel blend aboard the vessel Nanotsu on 16 June.

Norwegian Energy Trading (NET) AS logo. Norwegian Energy Trading renews ISCC certification for biofuel trading  

Norwegian bunker trader says renewal reflects growing biofuel volumes and commitment to verifiable sustainability standards.

Ivy Cove vessel. Jiangnan delivers VLAC with LPG dual-fuel main engine  

Vessel is claimed to be the world’s first 93,000 cbm very large ammonia carrier.

BIMCO logo. BIMCO adopts biofuel clause for time charter parties  

Shipping body has introduced a new contractual clause to govern the use of biofuels under time charter agreements.

Prince Madog hydrogen fuel cell retrofit receives LR certification. UK research vessel Prince Madog wins LR certification for hydrogen fuel cell retrofit  

Lloyd’s Register certifies what is claimed to be the first sea-going, manned hydrogen retrofit of its kind.

World Fuel logo. World Fuel seeks marine lube operations and sales executive in Greece  

US firm is recruiting for a commercial role focused on marine lubricants, based out of its Glyfada office.

ECSA Parliamentary Breakfast event. European Shipowners calls for fuel supplier mandates and ETS revenue investment ahead of policy revision  

Industry body urges EU policymakers to redirect carbon revenues into clean marine fuel production.


↑  Back to Top