This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 17 Jul 2018, 05:17 GMT

Sulphur 2020: Papering over the cracks


Fourth article in series by FIS's Chris Hudson looks at developments in the paper market with respect to the 2020 sulphur cap.


Chris Hudson, Fuel Oil & Tanker FFA Broker at Freight Investor Services (FIS).
Image credit: Freight Investor Services (FIS)
In the last of our series of articles on the 2020 sulphur cap, we will look at developments in the paper market. The changes in the physical grades and flow will, of course, cause a necessary change in all the associated industries from port infrastructure to insurance. At FIS our speciality is fuel oil hedging solutions for end user clients, so we will take a look at the developing paper market with respect to the low sulphur fuel switchover and what options these end users have.

I think it is fair to say that there is currently no perfect hedge for potential 2020 fuel risk, with the exception of continuing to use high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) on scrubber-fitted vessels.

For operators planning on using HSFO, the tried and trusted HSFO derivatives contract will give the perfect solution for being able to guarantee the costs of the fuel well into 2020. Currently everyone dislikes you, but at least you're sorted.

For the majority of people, their solution for the new IMO regulations will be using a blended 0.5% fuel oil, for which currently there are no direct equivalent paper contracts. To do so presents a choice for those who are looking to mitigate their fuel price risk in upcoming years. But, like squeezing into that pair of jeans from your 20s, those looking to hedge immediately will need to consider some slightly ill-fitting proxy trades.

For a proxy hedge, most counterparties have looked at a lower-sulphur-content fuel such as the gasoil contracts in Rotterdam and Singapore respectively. The two most used contracts are the Rotterdam 0.1% Gasoil and the Singapore Gasoil 10ppm contracts, making them overly compliant; but they are liquid, correlated, and tradeable today. You'll have to pay a pretty penny in premiums over both HSFO and the expected cost of 0.5% LSFO, but at least you will be able to sleep soundly at night knowing your hedge is on and working.

If you are able to sit on your hands for a few more months (which I suspect will be the position of the majority), then there will be specific 0.5% contracts coming into existence at the start of next year. Platts proposes to begin publishing new price assessments for RMG 380 CST marine fuel cargoes with a maximum sulphur limit of 0.5%, for loading in Singapore, Fujairah and Houston, and barges in Rotterdam, starting January 2, 2019.

And like the world's best pick 'n' mix for traders, there will also be the corresponding spreads between the current high-sulphur and these new low-sulphur contracts. The FIS contact details are the bottom of this article, so do get in touch to get set up to hit the ground hedging once these new contracts are operational.

With this in mind, there a several ways to approach hedging exposure: proxy gasoil trades; wait and directly hedge the 0.5% contract; hedge the HSFO contract now and then use the spread to roll it into ULSFO contract when it is introduced.

Each solution is specific to each client and the level of risk or premium they are happy to accept, but at least there are some options available, and operators do not just have to accept whatever costs the 2020 changes throw at them.

As a specialist broker of fuel oil derivatives - as well as wet and dry forward freight agreements - at FIS we have the expertise to help devise and execute whatever hedging strategy works best to keep you ahead of the pack for the 2020 switchover.


Graphic with photographs of IBIA's four elected board members for 2026. IBIA elects four board members for three-year terms  

Beumer, Campanella, Chung and Draffin join the board from 1 April 2026.

Iceberg floating in Arctic waters. IMO members urged to back mandatory Arctic fuel standards to cut black carbon emissions  

Clean Arctic Alliance calls for polar fuel measure requiring cleaner fuels in Arctic waters.

AET’s hybrid electric vessel render. AET adds hybrid-electric shuttle tanker to fleet with dual-fuel capability  

Tanker operator brings first hybrid-electric DPST into service on long-term charter with lower-emissions technology.

Methanol ship-to-ship bunkering operation at anchorage in Yokohama. Japan completes first ship-to-ship methanol bunkering at anchorage in Yokohama  

Five-way partnership delivers methanol fuel transfer between vessels at Keihin Port using domestically produced biomethanol.

Anna Cosulich vessel. Cosulich launches first methanol-ready bunker tanker in China  

Anna Cosulich is first of four sister vessels in fleet expansion programme.

Keel-laying ceremony of Natalia Cosulich. Cosulich begins construction of fourth methanol-ready bunker tanker in China  

Steel cutting for Natalia Cosulich marks completion of the group’s new alternative fuel-capable vessel series.

AiP award ceremony for cubic tank concept. Lloyd’s Register grants approval in principle to GTT’s CUBIQ LNG fuel tank design  

Classification society approves CUBIQ system designed to expand membrane-type LNG fuel tanks into commercial shipping.

International Chamber of Shipping nuclear webinar. ICS to host webinar on regulatory framework for nuclear merchant ships  

International Chamber of Shipping event on 26 February will examine regulatory pathways for nuclear vessels.

Cosco Shipping Libra vessel. World’s first full methanol dual-fuel retrofit completes maiden voyage  

Cosco Shipping Libra covered 27,800 nautical miles on a 106-day voyage after main and auxiliary engine conversion.

PetroChina Petroineos Trading logo. PetroChina International seeks bunker trader for Rotterdam as it expands ARA marine fuel operations  

Chinese energy trader aims to boost alternative fuels portfolio and market share in Europe.


↑  Back to Top