This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 8 Oct 2018, 12:18 GMT

Hapag to introduce new MFR mechanism to calculate bunker charges


Shipper estimates annual fuel costs will rise by around $1bn in 'the first years' after 2020 sulphur cap.


Hapag-Lloyd containers on board the Antwerpen Express.
Image credit: Hapag-Lloyd
Hapag-Lloyd announced on Monday that it will be establishing a 'Marine Fuel Recovery (MFR) mechanism', which it will use to calculate bunker-related surcharges from the start of next year.

It follows recent announcements by container lines such as CMA CGM and Maersk that have previously stated that they will be reviewing their fuel surcharge policy.

Hapag-Lloyd explained that the new mechanism has been developed as a result of stricter regulations approved by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that will see the new global sulphur cap for compliant fuel lowered from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020, requiring ships to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel oil.

Based on the assumption that the spread between high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO 0.5%) will be $250 per tonne by 2020, Hapag-Lloyd estimates that its additional annual costs will be around $1 billion in "the first years".

The new MFR mechanism is to be gradually implemented from January 1, 2019, and replace all existing fuel-related charges.

The MFR is said to be based on a formula that combines consumption with market prices for fuel oils - taking into account various parameters, such as the vessel consumption per day, fuel type and price (specific for HSFO, LSFO 0.5% and LSFO 0.1%), sea and port days, and carried TEU.

According to Hapag-Lloyd, the MFR "takes price fluctuations better into account" as it features improved coverage of upward and downward bunker price changes.

"Overall, it aims for transparent calculation of costs," Hapag-Lloyd noted.

Commenting on the MFR, Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, remarked: "We embrace the level playing field and environmental improvements resulting from a stricter regulation, but it is obvious that this is not for free and will create additional costs. This will be mainly reflected in the fuel bills for low-sulphur fuel oil, as there is no realistic alternative for the industry remaining compliant by 2020. With our MFR, we have developed a system for our customers that we think is fair, as it allows for a causal, transparent an easy-to-understand calculation of fuel costs."

Hapag-Lloyd is currently consuming around 1.1 million tonnes of bunker fuel per quarter. Following the merger with the Middle East boxship operator United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) in May 2017, Hapag-Lloyd used 2.2 million tonnes of fuel during the first half (H1) of 2018 - up 29.4 percent on the prior-year period.

The Hamburg-headquartered firm also saw the average price it pays for marine fuel jump 23.4 percent to $385 per tonne in H1.

At this average price level over a 12-month period, bunker consumption of 4.4 million tonnes would result in an annual bunker bill of just under $1.7 billion for Hapag-Lloyd, whilst a future $250 increase in its average price to $635 per tonne would see its fuel costs rise to $2.79 billion - just over $1 billion more than it is currently paying.

As previously reported in August, Hapag-Lloyd is due to perform two pilot projects in 2019 where it will test exhaust gas scrubber systems on two large container ships and convert another to LNG propulsion.


Maritime Technologies Forum (MTF) logo. MTF issues safety management guidelines for methanol-fuelled ships  

New MTF report offers recommendations for developing and strengthening safety management systems for methanol as a fuel.

Kapitan Dranitsyn icebreaker. European shipowners call for permanent EU ETS derogations for islands, outermost regions and ice-classed vessels  

ECSA urges the European Commission to extend maritime ETS exemptions beyond 2030 ahead of directive revision.

Global Maritime Forum logo. Compliance pooling could help unlock investment in zero-emission marine fuels, says Getting to Zero Coalition  

A new insight brief argues pooling models must evolve to support long-term e-fuels offtake.

Levante LNG and Legend of the Seas STS bunkering operation. Peninsula performs maiden bio-LNG delivery in Cádiz  

Bunker firm has now supplied all three of Royal Caribbean Group’s Icon-class vessels with bio-LNG.

Shawn Ho, Oilmar. Oilmar appoints Shawn Ho as senior manager for business development and bunker trading in Singapore  

Marine fuel seller hires experienced industry professional to bolster its Singapore operations.

Island Horizon vessel. Island Oil expands fleet with acquisition of two tankers for Mediterranean operations  

Island Polaris and Island Horizon join bunker firm's fleet of vessels.

Meera naming ceremony. Naming ceremony held for LPG dual-fuel ammonia carrier  

VLAC Meera named during event held in China on 10 July.

IMO Council 137th session IMO adopts Singapore-led resolution on protection of shipping lanes  

Thirty co-sponsors back a resolution reaffirming navigational rights under international law.

TT-Line Green Ship 2.0 illustration. TT-Line orders second LNG-hybrid battery ferry for Baltic Sea operations  

German ferry operator doubles down on LNG-hybrid technology with a second next-generation newbuild.

CMA CGM Notre Dame and Gas Agility ship-to-ship (STS) bunkering operation. CMA CGM Notre Dame receives first European bio-LNG bunkering during Rotterdam maiden call  

LNG-powered container ship takes on bio-LNG derived from agricultural waste.


↑  Back to Top