This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 8 Oct 2018, 12:18 GMT

Hapag to introduce new MFR mechanism to calculate bunker charges


Shipper estimates annual fuel costs will rise by around $1bn in 'the first years' after 2020 sulphur cap.


Hapag-Lloyd containers on board the Antwerpen Express.
Image credit: Hapag-Lloyd
Hapag-Lloyd announced on Monday that it will be establishing a 'Marine Fuel Recovery (MFR) mechanism', which it will use to calculate bunker-related surcharges from the start of next year.

It follows recent announcements by container lines such as CMA CGM and Maersk that have previously stated that they will be reviewing their fuel surcharge policy.

Hapag-Lloyd explained that the new mechanism has been developed as a result of stricter regulations approved by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that will see the new global sulphur cap for compliant fuel lowered from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020, requiring ships to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel oil.

Based on the assumption that the spread between high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO 0.5%) will be $250 per tonne by 2020, Hapag-Lloyd estimates that its additional annual costs will be around $1 billion in "the first years".

The new MFR mechanism is to be gradually implemented from January 1, 2019, and replace all existing fuel-related charges.

The MFR is said to be based on a formula that combines consumption with market prices for fuel oils - taking into account various parameters, such as the vessel consumption per day, fuel type and price (specific for HSFO, LSFO 0.5% and LSFO 0.1%), sea and port days, and carried TEU.

According to Hapag-Lloyd, the MFR "takes price fluctuations better into account" as it features improved coverage of upward and downward bunker price changes.

"Overall, it aims for transparent calculation of costs," Hapag-Lloyd noted.

Commenting on the MFR, Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, remarked: "We embrace the level playing field and environmental improvements resulting from a stricter regulation, but it is obvious that this is not for free and will create additional costs. This will be mainly reflected in the fuel bills for low-sulphur fuel oil, as there is no realistic alternative for the industry remaining compliant by 2020. With our MFR, we have developed a system for our customers that we think is fair, as it allows for a causal, transparent an easy-to-understand calculation of fuel costs."

Hapag-Lloyd is currently consuming around 1.1 million tonnes of bunker fuel per quarter. Following the merger with the Middle East boxship operator United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) in May 2017, Hapag-Lloyd used 2.2 million tonnes of fuel during the first half (H1) of 2018 - up 29.4 percent on the prior-year period.

The Hamburg-headquartered firm also saw the average price it pays for marine fuel jump 23.4 percent to $385 per tonne in H1.

At this average price level over a 12-month period, bunker consumption of 4.4 million tonnes would result in an annual bunker bill of just under $1.7 billion for Hapag-Lloyd, whilst a future $250 increase in its average price to $635 per tonne would see its fuel costs rise to $2.79 billion - just over $1 billion more than it is currently paying.

As previously reported in August, Hapag-Lloyd is due to perform two pilot projects in 2019 where it will test exhaust gas scrubber systems on two large container ships and convert another to LNG propulsion.


Yampu vessel. CSL delivers world’s first battery-powered self-unloading bulk carrier  

MV Yampu will transport limestone for Adbri in Australia, with full electric operation targeted by 2031.

Illustration of hydrogen fuel cell system. NYK, Yanmar and Eneos to install hydrogen fuel cell system on new Tokyo dining cruise vessel  

Three Japanese companies are collaborating to bring hydrogen propulsion to a dining cruise ship due to enter service in 2027.

Signing ceremony for 8,600-ceu dual-fuel PCTCs. Sallaum Lines orders four 8,600-ceu dual-fuel PCTCs from Chinese yard — its largest vessels to date  

Ammonia-ready car carriers ordered from XSI mark the next phase of Sallaum Lines’ fleet renewal.

Factory acceptance test (FAT) for X72DF-A ammonia engine. WinGD completes factory acceptance test on X72DF-A ammonia engine destined for CMB.Tech bulker  

Swiss engine maker WinGD has completed factory acceptance testing of its ammonia-fuelled X72DF-A engine in China.

Everllence B&W S60ME-C10.5-GI-EcoEGR engine render. Everllence secures world’s first order for ME-GI Mk10.7 dual-fuel engine  

Norwegian car-carrier operator GCC selects next-generation methane engine for four newbuilds.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC) and CMA CGM logos. Capital Clean Energy Carriers and CMA CGM form joint venture to build $82.8m LNG bunkering vessel  

The 20,000-cbm dual-fuel vessel is due for delivery in the third quarter of 2028.

Hong Kong flag. Hong Kong launches port dues and vessel registration incentives to boost green fuel bunkering  

Two new schemes offer financial concessions to attract green fuel vessels and grow the Hong Kong fleet.

Mein Schiff Flow vessel. Fincantieri delivers LNG-ready cruise ship Mein Schiff Flow to TUI Cruises  

The 160,000 gross-tonne vessel is the second of two InTUItion-class dual-fuel ships.

Monjasa logo. Monjasa seeks trader for Fredericia-based Northwest Europe desk  

Bunker firm is recruiting a trader to join its Northwest Europe team.

Port of Barcelona and Port of Shanghai signing ceremony. Barcelona and Shanghai sign strategic port cooperation agreement targeting green fuels and digital corridors  

Ports formalise a 'sister ports' relationship covering green shipping, digitalisation and intermodality.


↑  Back to Top