This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 8 Oct 2018, 12:18 GMT

Hapag to introduce new MFR mechanism to calculate bunker charges


Shipper estimates annual fuel costs will rise by around $1bn in 'the first years' after 2020 sulphur cap.


Hapag-Lloyd containers on board the Antwerpen Express.
Image: Hapag-Lloyd
Hapag-Lloyd announced on Monday that it will be establishing a 'Marine Fuel Recovery (MFR) mechanism', which it will use to calculate bunker-related surcharges from the start of next year.

It follows recent announcements by container lines such as CMA CGM and Maersk that have previously stated that they will be reviewing their fuel surcharge policy.

Hapag-Lloyd explained that the new mechanism has been developed as a result of stricter regulations approved by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that will see the new global sulphur cap for compliant fuel lowered from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020, requiring ships to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel oil.

Based on the assumption that the spread between high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO 0.5%) will be $250 per tonne by 2020, Hapag-Lloyd estimates that its additional annual costs will be around $1 billion in "the first years".

The new MFR mechanism is to be gradually implemented from January 1, 2019, and replace all existing fuel-related charges.

The MFR is said to be based on a formula that combines consumption with market prices for fuel oils - taking into account various parameters, such as the vessel consumption per day, fuel type and price (specific for HSFO, LSFO 0.5% and LSFO 0.1%), sea and port days, and carried TEU.

According to Hapag-Lloyd, the MFR "takes price fluctuations better into account" as it features improved coverage of upward and downward bunker price changes.

"Overall, it aims for transparent calculation of costs," Hapag-Lloyd noted.

Commenting on the MFR, Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, remarked: "We embrace the level playing field and environmental improvements resulting from a stricter regulation, but it is obvious that this is not for free and will create additional costs. This will be mainly reflected in the fuel bills for low-sulphur fuel oil, as there is no realistic alternative for the industry remaining compliant by 2020. With our MFR, we have developed a system for our customers that we think is fair, as it allows for a causal, transparent an easy-to-understand calculation of fuel costs."

Hapag-Lloyd is currently consuming around 1.1 million tonnes of bunker fuel per quarter. Following the merger with the Middle East boxship operator United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) in May 2017, Hapag-Lloyd used 2.2 million tonnes of fuel during the first half (H1) of 2018 - up 29.4 percent on the prior-year period.

The Hamburg-headquartered firm also saw the average price it pays for marine fuel jump 23.4 percent to $385 per tonne in H1.

At this average price level over a 12-month period, bunker consumption of 4.4 million tonnes would result in an annual bunker bill of just under $1.7 billion for Hapag-Lloyd, whilst a future $250 increase in its average price to $635 per tonne would see its fuel costs rise to $2.79 billion - just over $1 billion more than it is currently paying.

As previously reported in August, Hapag-Lloyd is due to perform two pilot projects in 2019 where it will test exhaust gas scrubber systems on two large container ships and convert another to LNG propulsion.


Illustration of balance scale with cargo ship and penalty block. FuelEU penalties spark contract disputes as first-year compliance costs emerge  

Shipowners and charterers negotiate biofuel handling, payment timing, and multiplier penalties under new regulations.

Marina Bay Sands, Singapore. Singapore tops first global container port ranking by DNV and Menon Economics  

The port leads across all five assessment pillars in inaugural industry report.

Jack Spyros Pringle, Lloyd’s Register. Marine fuel procurement becomes strategic imperative as regulatory pressures mount: LR  

Operators must adopt comprehensive fuel strategies amid supply constraints and compliance costs, says Lloyd's Register.

Xinfu124 ultra-large LNG carrier. Private Chinese shipbuilder plans to deliver eight dual-fuel boxships  

Yangzi Xinfu is fully booked until May 2029 and expected to post annual sales revenue exceeding $1.4 billion.

Østensjø Rederi newbuild tug render. Østensjø Rederi orders methanol-ready tug from Spanish shipyard  

Norwegian operator contracts Astilleros Gondán for vessel with diesel-electric hybrid propulsion system.

Bound4blue worker in safety gear. Bound4blue establishes China production base for wind propulsion systems  

Spanish wind propulsion firm targets Asian shipbuilding market with outsourced manufacturing network.

Alfa Laval and Hanwha Ocean Ecotech sign MoU. Alfa Laval and Hanwha Ocean Ecotech partner on ammonia fuel systems  

Collaboration aims to develop ammonia fuel technology for dual-fuel vessels in the Asian market.

Meg Dowling, Lloyd's Register. Nuclear-powered boxships could deliver $68m annual savings: Lloyd's Register  

Small modular reactors could eliminate fuel costs and carbon penalties while boosting cargo capacity, says report.

Minerva Bunkering and Autoridad Portuaria de Las Palmas (APLP) signing ceremony. Minerva Bunkering extends Las Palmas terminal concession by 15 years  

Bunker supplier adds barge capacity and explores new terminal for energy transition fuels.

Liam Blackmore, Lloyd's Register. Ammonia Energy Association releases gas detection whitepaper with Lloyd's Register input  

Lloyd's Register contributed expertise to new guidance on ammonia detection systems for the maritime sector.


↑  Back to Top