This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 8 Oct 2018, 12:18 GMT

Hapag to introduce new MFR mechanism to calculate bunker charges


Shipper estimates annual fuel costs will rise by around $1bn in 'the first years' after 2020 sulphur cap.


Hapag-Lloyd containers on board the Antwerpen Express.
Image credit: Hapag-Lloyd
Hapag-Lloyd announced on Monday that it will be establishing a 'Marine Fuel Recovery (MFR) mechanism', which it will use to calculate bunker-related surcharges from the start of next year.

It follows recent announcements by container lines such as CMA CGM and Maersk that have previously stated that they will be reviewing their fuel surcharge policy.

Hapag-Lloyd explained that the new mechanism has been developed as a result of stricter regulations approved by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that will see the new global sulphur cap for compliant fuel lowered from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020, requiring ships to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel oil.

Based on the assumption that the spread between high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO 0.5%) will be $250 per tonne by 2020, Hapag-Lloyd estimates that its additional annual costs will be around $1 billion in "the first years".

The new MFR mechanism is to be gradually implemented from January 1, 2019, and replace all existing fuel-related charges.

The MFR is said to be based on a formula that combines consumption with market prices for fuel oils - taking into account various parameters, such as the vessel consumption per day, fuel type and price (specific for HSFO, LSFO 0.5% and LSFO 0.1%), sea and port days, and carried TEU.

According to Hapag-Lloyd, the MFR "takes price fluctuations better into account" as it features improved coverage of upward and downward bunker price changes.

"Overall, it aims for transparent calculation of costs," Hapag-Lloyd noted.

Commenting on the MFR, Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, remarked: "We embrace the level playing field and environmental improvements resulting from a stricter regulation, but it is obvious that this is not for free and will create additional costs. This will be mainly reflected in the fuel bills for low-sulphur fuel oil, as there is no realistic alternative for the industry remaining compliant by 2020. With our MFR, we have developed a system for our customers that we think is fair, as it allows for a causal, transparent an easy-to-understand calculation of fuel costs."

Hapag-Lloyd is currently consuming around 1.1 million tonnes of bunker fuel per quarter. Following the merger with the Middle East boxship operator United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) in May 2017, Hapag-Lloyd used 2.2 million tonnes of fuel during the first half (H1) of 2018 - up 29.4 percent on the prior-year period.

The Hamburg-headquartered firm also saw the average price it pays for marine fuel jump 23.4 percent to $385 per tonne in H1.

At this average price level over a 12-month period, bunker consumption of 4.4 million tonnes would result in an annual bunker bill of just under $1.7 billion for Hapag-Lloyd, whilst a future $250 increase in its average price to $635 per tonne would see its fuel costs rise to $2.79 billion - just over $1 billion more than it is currently paying.

As previously reported in August, Hapag-Lloyd is due to perform two pilot projects in 2019 where it will test exhaust gas scrubber systems on two large container ships and convert another to LNG propulsion.


ABB Generations 2025 publication on smartphone. ABB publishes 2025 maritime insights on decarbonization and digitalization  

Technology firm compiles annual articles exploring energy efficiency, automation, and alternative fuels for the shipping industry.

ClassNK AiP handover ceremony for bulk carrier design. ClassNK grants approval for multi-fuel ready bulk carrier design by Oshima Shipbuilding  

Vessel design accommodates future conversion to ammonia, methanol, or LNG with carbon capture capability.

The Arctic and black carbon graphic. Four countries propose Arctic fuel measure to cut black carbon from shipping  

Proposal to IMO's PPR 13 meeting aims to establish fuel regulations under MARPOL Annex VI.

T&E chart 1. Spain, Norway and Denmark lead Europe's green shipping fuel production, study finds  

Regulatory uncertainty prevents most e-fuel projects from progressing beyond the planning stage, says analysis.

Charles Simon Edwin, Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering appoints Charles Simon Edwin as operations and compliance manager in Singapore  

Edwin transitions from sourcing role, bringing experience from physical supply operations and bunker trading.

Hamburg Express vessel. Hapag-Lloyd wins ZEMBA's second tender for e-methanol deployment  

Container line to deploy e-methanol on trans-oceanic route from 2027, abating 120,000 tonnes CO₂e.

Nuclear-powered multi-role icebreaker design render. RINA grants approval for Chinese nuclear-powered Arctic icebreaker design  

CSSC's multi-role vessel combines cargo transport and polar tourism with molten salt reactor propulsion.

Glander International Bunkering logo. Glander International Bunkering seeks two bunker traders for Singapore office  

Firm recruiting traders with 3-5 years of experience to join team in key Asian hub.

Hiring concept with puzzle pieces. Malik Supply seeks bunker trader for Fredericia office  

Danish company advertises role focusing on client portfolio development and energy product trading.

Hiring concept with puzzle pieces and a magnifying glass. Chimbusco Pan Nation seeks credit analysts for Asia-Pacific and Middle East expansion  

Bunker firm recruiting for Hong Kong, Singapore, and Shanghai offices with APAC and MENA focus.


↑  Back to Top