This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 8 Oct 2018, 12:18 GMT

Hapag to introduce new MFR mechanism to calculate bunker charges


Shipper estimates annual fuel costs will rise by around $1bn in 'the first years' after 2020 sulphur cap.


Hapag-Lloyd containers on board the Antwerpen Express.
Image credit: Hapag-Lloyd
Hapag-Lloyd announced on Monday that it will be establishing a 'Marine Fuel Recovery (MFR) mechanism', which it will use to calculate bunker-related surcharges from the start of next year.

It follows recent announcements by container lines such as CMA CGM and Maersk that have previously stated that they will be reviewing their fuel surcharge policy.

Hapag-Lloyd explained that the new mechanism has been developed as a result of stricter regulations approved by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that will see the new global sulphur cap for compliant fuel lowered from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020, requiring ships to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel oil.

Based on the assumption that the spread between high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO 0.5%) will be $250 per tonne by 2020, Hapag-Lloyd estimates that its additional annual costs will be around $1 billion in "the first years".

The new MFR mechanism is to be gradually implemented from January 1, 2019, and replace all existing fuel-related charges.

The MFR is said to be based on a formula that combines consumption with market prices for fuel oils - taking into account various parameters, such as the vessel consumption per day, fuel type and price (specific for HSFO, LSFO 0.5% and LSFO 0.1%), sea and port days, and carried TEU.

According to Hapag-Lloyd, the MFR "takes price fluctuations better into account" as it features improved coverage of upward and downward bunker price changes.

"Overall, it aims for transparent calculation of costs," Hapag-Lloyd noted.

Commenting on the MFR, Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, remarked: "We embrace the level playing field and environmental improvements resulting from a stricter regulation, but it is obvious that this is not for free and will create additional costs. This will be mainly reflected in the fuel bills for low-sulphur fuel oil, as there is no realistic alternative for the industry remaining compliant by 2020. With our MFR, we have developed a system for our customers that we think is fair, as it allows for a causal, transparent an easy-to-understand calculation of fuel costs."

Hapag-Lloyd is currently consuming around 1.1 million tonnes of bunker fuel per quarter. Following the merger with the Middle East boxship operator United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) in May 2017, Hapag-Lloyd used 2.2 million tonnes of fuel during the first half (H1) of 2018 - up 29.4 percent on the prior-year period.

The Hamburg-headquartered firm also saw the average price it pays for marine fuel jump 23.4 percent to $385 per tonne in H1.

At this average price level over a 12-month period, bunker consumption of 4.4 million tonnes would result in an annual bunker bill of just under $1.7 billion for Hapag-Lloyd, whilst a future $250 increase in its average price to $635 per tonne would see its fuel costs rise to $2.79 billion - just over $1 billion more than it is currently paying.

As previously reported in August, Hapag-Lloyd is due to perform two pilot projects in 2019 where it will test exhaust gas scrubber systems on two large container ships and convert another to LNG propulsion.


VPS logo. The emergence of B100 FAME in a volatile distillate market | Paul Hoather, VPS  

VPS UK Sales Manager provides recommendations following increased B100 usage due to price dynamics.

Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. CHB2059. Changhong International begins construction of first 11,400-teu LNG dual-fuel boxship for Oceanroutes  

Chinese yard starts work on first of 18 vessels in order from new customer.

Wee Meng Tan, GCMD. China’s renewable energy could fuel global shipping decarbonisation, says GCMD  

Maritime body sees potential for China to convert domestic wind and solar into green marine fuels.

OceanScore logo. OceanScore adds vessel activation controls for EU ETS and FuelEU compliance workflows  

Software provider introduces a feature allowing third-party managers to toggle vessel compliance status while preserving historical data.

Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) logo. MOL develops carbon inset and book-and-claim programme for alternative marine fuels  

Japanese shipowner details mechanism to verify, certify and fund use of biomethanol and other low-carbon fuels.

Deck view of Hafnia Larvik at sea. Hafnia orders eight MR tankers from Hyundai Heavy Industries for $405m  

Vessels scheduled for delivery between Q3 2028 and Q2 2029 at South Korean shipyard.

Sommer Mitchel, IBIA. IBIA appoints Sommer Mitchell as marketing and events coordinator  

Mitchell brings more than five years of experience to the marine fuels industry association.

Lazulite Ace vessel. MOL's 12th LNG dual-fuel car carrier makes maiden call in Singapore  

Lazulite Ace arrives in Singapore following delivery from Japanese shipyard in March.

Methanol bunkering demonstration at Kandla. Deendayal Port Authority completes India’s first methanol bunkering demonstration  

Kandla port conducts maiden methanol bunkering trial in 'step towards maritime decarbonization.'

Keel-laying ceremony of Viking Astrea. Fincantieri lays keel for hydrogen-powered cruise ship Viking Astrea  

Second hydrogen-fuelled vessel in Viking series scheduled for delivery in 2027 from Ancona yard.


↑  Back to Top