This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 8 Oct 2018, 12:18 GMT

Hapag to introduce new MFR mechanism to calculate bunker charges


Shipper estimates annual fuel costs will rise by around $1bn in 'the first years' after 2020 sulphur cap.


Hapag-Lloyd containers on board the Antwerpen Express.
Image credit: Hapag-Lloyd
Hapag-Lloyd announced on Monday that it will be establishing a 'Marine Fuel Recovery (MFR) mechanism', which it will use to calculate bunker-related surcharges from the start of next year.

It follows recent announcements by container lines such as CMA CGM and Maersk that have previously stated that they will be reviewing their fuel surcharge policy.

Hapag-Lloyd explained that the new mechanism has been developed as a result of stricter regulations approved by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that will see the new global sulphur cap for compliant fuel lowered from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020, requiring ships to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel oil.

Based on the assumption that the spread between high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO 0.5%) will be $250 per tonne by 2020, Hapag-Lloyd estimates that its additional annual costs will be around $1 billion in "the first years".

The new MFR mechanism is to be gradually implemented from January 1, 2019, and replace all existing fuel-related charges.

The MFR is said to be based on a formula that combines consumption with market prices for fuel oils - taking into account various parameters, such as the vessel consumption per day, fuel type and price (specific for HSFO, LSFO 0.5% and LSFO 0.1%), sea and port days, and carried TEU.

According to Hapag-Lloyd, the MFR "takes price fluctuations better into account" as it features improved coverage of upward and downward bunker price changes.

"Overall, it aims for transparent calculation of costs," Hapag-Lloyd noted.

Commenting on the MFR, Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, remarked: "We embrace the level playing field and environmental improvements resulting from a stricter regulation, but it is obvious that this is not for free and will create additional costs. This will be mainly reflected in the fuel bills for low-sulphur fuel oil, as there is no realistic alternative for the industry remaining compliant by 2020. With our MFR, we have developed a system for our customers that we think is fair, as it allows for a causal, transparent an easy-to-understand calculation of fuel costs."

Hapag-Lloyd is currently consuming around 1.1 million tonnes of bunker fuel per quarter. Following the merger with the Middle East boxship operator United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) in May 2017, Hapag-Lloyd used 2.2 million tonnes of fuel during the first half (H1) of 2018 - up 29.4 percent on the prior-year period.

The Hamburg-headquartered firm also saw the average price it pays for marine fuel jump 23.4 percent to $385 per tonne in H1.

At this average price level over a 12-month period, bunker consumption of 4.4 million tonnes would result in an annual bunker bill of just under $1.7 billion for Hapag-Lloyd, whilst a future $250 increase in its average price to $635 per tonne would see its fuel costs rise to $2.79 billion - just over $1 billion more than it is currently paying.

As previously reported in August, Hapag-Lloyd is due to perform two pilot projects in 2019 where it will test exhaust gas scrubber systems on two large container ships and convert another to LNG propulsion.


Verde Marine Energy (VME) logo. Verde Marine Energy completes its first B100 biofuel bunkering in ARA region  

Supplier delivers B100 advanced FAME to Vertom vessel.

CMA CGM Notre Dame vessel. Bureau Veritas classes CMA CGM’s first 24,000-teu LNG dual-fuel mega boxship built by Yangzi Xinfu  

BV highlights work carried out during design, construction and commissioning of new new ultra-large container vessel.

ECSA and A4E logo. Shipping and aviation bodies urge EU to redirect ETS revenues into sustainable fuels  

ECSA and A4E say more than €11bn in annual ETS contributions must fund decarbonisation efforts.

Scotland flag. Bunker One deploys supply barge at Aberdeen South Harbour ahead of July launch  

Marine fuel supplier targets Aberdeen’s growing maritime sector with dedicated barge.

Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. H2840. Jiangnan Shipyard breaks ground on LPG-fuelled ammonia carrier for Jaldhi Overseas  

Constructions starts on 95,000-cbm vessel set to be world’s largest liquid ammonia carrier.

Mineral Latvija vessel. Fortescue and CMB.Tech sign charter deal for up to 12 ammonia-capable bulkers  

The agreement covers 12 Newcastlemax vessels, with three to be delivered as dual-fuel ammonia ships by end-2026.

Federal Beaufort vessel. Verra publishes new carbon methodology for alternative fuels in shipping  

VM0053 framework offers an accounting structure for emissions reductions in maritime transport.

NYK LNG-powered vessel connected to shore power. ICO launches Belgium’s first commercial shore power facility for ro-ro vessels at Zeebrugge  

NYK Group subsidiary connects pure car and truck carrier to green shore power at Belgian port.

Ocean Express ship-to-ship (STS) LNG bunkering operation. Dan-Bunkering completes LNG supply in China for Sallaum Lines’ newbuild PCTC  

Bunker firm delivers approximately 1,400 tonnes of LNG to Sallaum Lines’ newbuild car carrier in China.

Seaspan Lions (STS) LNG bunkering operation. Low-GHG methane could keep LNG-capable fleet compliant as regulations tighten, DNV paper argues  

Biomethane and e-methane offer a compliance pathway for LNG-capable ships, says DNV.


↑  Back to Top