This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 24 Aug 2016, 09:18 GMT

Los Angeles holds the line on emissions targets


Air quality programs largely counter the effects of 2015 congestion.



The Port of Los Angeles has revealed that it largely continued to meet its emissions reduction targets in 2015.

In its latest report, entitled 'Port of Los Angeles Inventory of Air Emissions - 2015', overall, diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions remain down an unprecedented 85 percent from all sources related to port operations, replicating the port's record set in 2014. Likewise, sulphur oxides (SOx) emissions are down 97 percent, nearing total elimination. Nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions are down 51 percent, just 1 percent shy of the 52 percent reduction rate in 2014.

The detailed inventory's latest findings are based on data collected during calendar year 2015 and reviewed by regional, state and federal air regulatory agencies. The baseline is 2005, the year before the landmark San Pedro Bay Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) was adopted. The results show the port continues to exceed its 2023 targets for reducing DPM and SOx (77 percent and 93 percent respectively) and is within striking distance of its 2023 target of reducing NOx emissions 59 percent.

The port also held the line on reducing the health risk of port-related emissions by lowering them 85 percent. That level sustains the progress achieved in 2014 when the port hit its 2020 target.

In addition to criteria pollutants like NOx, SOx and DPM, the Port of Los Angeles also tracks greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which contribute to global warming and are associated with climate change. The 2015 emissions inventory shows that GHG emissions were 10 percent below the 2005 baseline, but the 2015 GHG emissions were higher than Port GHG emissions in 2014, when they were 16 percent below the 2005 baseline. The increased 2015 GHG emissions are mostly attributable to congestion issues experienced in the first part of 2015. With congestion now behind it, the port anticipates a return to larger GHG emissions reductions for 2016, as the port continues in its efforts to achieve California's goal of reducing GHGs 80 percent by 2050, based on 1990 levels.

"Our clean air strategies were put to the test with the backlog of ships we experienced in the first part of 2015, and we largely held our ground," said Port Executive Director Gene Seroka. "With this temporary situation behind us, we expect to see clean air progress when the numbers come in for 2016."

Ongoing vessel emissions reduction programs that helped protect clean air gains include the switch to cleaner vessel fuels, more ships running on electricity at berth, and operators voluntarily slowing ships in the harbour. Due to these and other vessel pollution reduction initiatives, ships calling at the port now emit less DPM than locomotives and harbour craft combined.

Also significant is the industry trend toward bigger ships carrying more cargo to major ports. In 2015, 29 percent fewer vessels delivered 41 percent more cargo to the Port of Los Angeles, reducing the amount of fuel needed to move each container compared with 2005. Newer, larger vessels also have cleaner engines and more advanced technology that enhance their efficiency and shrink their emissions.

The Port of Los Angeles is North America's leading seaport by container volume and cargo value, facilitating $270 billion in trade during 2015.

The port's progress continues to be reflected in the reduced share of emissions its activity contributes to the South Coast Air Basin. The region is home to more than 16.8 million people in urban portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside counties and all of Orange County. Only 2 percent of all SOx emissions in the South Coast Air Basin are attributable to port operations compared with 23.2 percent in 2005. DPM emissions from the port account for 4.8 percent of the region's total, about a third of what they measured in 2005. NOx emissions are 4.3 percent, down from 4.6 percent in 2005.


Container ship at harbour. Skuld warns of unusual chemical compounds in Southeast Asian marine fuels  

Marine insurer reports fuels meeting ISO 8217 standards but containing high levels of hydrocarbon compounds.

Arsenio Dominguez, IMO. IMO chief urges progress on net-zero framework amid Hormuz crisis  

Arsenio Dominguez calls for constructive dialogue as MEPC 84 tackles greenhouse gas measures and ballast water regulations.

Monjasa Shaker vessel. Monjasa reflags UAE-based tankers to Emirates registry  

Marine fuels supplier transitions first of three vessels from Liberian to UAE flag.

Ammonia bunkering at Port of Ulsan. Lotte Fine Chemical completes world’s first commercial ammonia bunkering at Ulsan  

South Korean chemical company claims to have established a complete green ammonia value chain.

London skyline. Propeller Fuels seeks bunker trader for London office  

Marine fuel supplier advertises for trader to manage procurement, sales and client relationships.

Windward Hamburg vessel. Fincantieri’s VARD launches first of four offshore wind vessels for Windward Offshore  

VARD 4 19 design vessel features battery hybrid propulsion and green methanol preparation.

Singapore Maritime Week panel session. Singapore industry leaders call for regulatory clarity on maritime energy transition  

SSA councillors highlight need for government support and clear policies to enable alternative fuel adoption.

Aerial view of container vessel at sea. Seaspan and Technolog unveil LNG feeder design with four-week ammonia conversion pathway  

Lloyd’s Register grants approval for a 3,370 TEU vessel concept designed for swift transition to zero-carbon fuel.

David Foo, MPA. Singapore’s MPA backs LNG as part of multi-fuel strategy for shipping decarbonisation  

Authority emphasises regulatory frameworks and workforce development as sector navigates geopolitical uncertainty and energy transition.

ABS and PIL sign MoU. ABS and PIL partner on book-and-claim emissions verification  

Classification society to verify fuel consumption and emissions data for shipping line’s alternative fuel claims.


↑  Back to Top