Mon 16 Apr 2018, 09:18 GMT

PPR6 to develop Arctic HFO ban as nations urge 2021 implementation


MEPC directs 2019 sub-committee to draw up plan following strongly worded proposal to apply ban 'no later than the end of 2021'.


US Coast Guard vessels pictured in icy waters.
Image credit: Flickr
Plans to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil (HFO) from Arctic shipping, along with an assessment of the impact of such a ban, were agreed during the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 72), which closed on Friday in London.

The meeting directed the Sub-Committee on Pollution Prevention and Response (PPR) to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic at its next session, in February 2019 (PPR6), "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

In addition to assessing the impact of a ban on communities and developing a ban on HFO use and carriage as fuel in the Arctic, PPR 6 will develop a definition of HFO taking into account regulation 43 of MARPOL Annex I (the Antarctic HFO ban) and prepare a set of guidelines on mitigation measures to reduce risks of use and carriage of HFO as fuel by ships in Arctic waters.

The latest development follows the agreement made in July 2017 for MEPC to consider the "development of measures to reduce risks of use and carriage of heavy fuel oil as fuel by ships in Arctic waters".

A strongly worded proposal to ban HFO as shipping fuel from Arctic waters was co-sponsored by Finland, Germany, Iceland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden and the US.

The proposal for a ban, along with a proposal to assess the impact of such a ban on Arctic communities from Canada, was supported by Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Ireland, Japan, the League of Arab States, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK.

The proposal text states: "A single HFO spill could have devastating and lasting effects on fragile Arctic marine and coastal environments. In addition, Arctic shipping is projected to continue to rise, thus increasing the risk of a spill. For these reasons, the ban on HFO should be implemented as soon as possible, and any delay in implementation of the HFO ban by eligible ships should be short-lived... The co-sponsors propose that the implementation date of the ban be set for no later than the end of 2021."

Dr Sian Prior, lead advisor to the Clean Arctic Alliance, a coalition of 18 non-governmental organisations working to end HFO use as marine fuel in Arctic waters, commented: "Thanks to inspired and motivated action taken by a number of IMO member states to move towards a ban on heavy fuel oil, Arctic communities and ecosystems will be protected from the threat of oil spills, and the impact of black carbon emissions.

"A ban is the simplest and most effective way to mitigate the risks of HFO - and now we're calling on the IMO to ensure that this ban will be in place by 2021. Any impact assessment must inform, but not delay progression towards an Arctic HFO ban, and member states must ensure that Arctic communities are not burdened with any costs associated with such a ban," she continued.

"With Denmark the sixth Arctic nation to back a ban on HFO from Arctic Shipping, the green alliance of Arctic nations have sent a clear message to the IMO," said Kare Press-Kristensen, senior advisor in the Danish Ecological Council. "With both the Danish government and the Danish shipping industry united to ban HFO, we hope to gain further international support for the ban from more nations and progressive parts of the shipping industry. Next step will be to engage Greenland further in planning and preparing for the ban."

Tor Christian Sletner, head of environment, research and innovation at the Norwegian Shipowners' Association, was cited as saying: "We know heavy fuel oil is very hard to pick up, we know that in this environment, with ice-infested waters, with darkness, with heavy cold, with long distances, accidents with a ship spilling heavy fuel oil in the water is very serious."


CMA CGM Eugenie naming ceremony. CMA CGM names 15,000-teu methanol-fuelled containership CMA CGM Eugenie  

Vessel to operate on Phoenician Express service linking Asia, Middle East, and Mediterranean.

Christian Larsen, Island Oil. Island Oil appoints Christian Larsen as senior trader in Denmark expansion  

Marine fuel supplier establishes operations in Denmark as part of expansion strategy.

HIF Global and Government of Uruguay MoU signing. HIF Global signs Uruguay agreement to advance US$5.3bn e-fuels facility in PaysandĂș  

Memorandum sets roadmap for final investment decision on plant targeting 880,000 tonnes annual production.

CMAL vessel. Corvus Energy wins largest-ever contract for seven electric Scottish ferries  

Battery systems supplier secures record order from Remontowa Shipbuilding for CMAL's Small Vessel Replacement Program.

HiMSEN H32CDF-LA engine classification approval test. HHI-EMD secures type approval for 5.4MW ammonia engine  

Lloyd's Register approves H32CDF-LA dual-fuel engine following three-day testing programme in Korea.

Atticus vessel. Global Fuel Supply acquires first bunker tanker  

Company transitions from chartering vessels to ship ownership with asset to be renamed MV Blue Alliance.

ABB Generations 2025 publication on smartphone. ABB publishes 2025 maritime insights on decarbonisation and digitalization  

Technology firm compiles annual articles exploring energy efficiency, automation, and alternative fuels for the shipping industry.

ClassNK AiP handover ceremony for bulk carrier design. ClassNK grants approval for multi-fuel ready bulk carrier design by Oshima Shipbuilding  

Vessel design accommodates future conversion to ammonia, methanol, or LNG with carbon capture capability.

The Arctic and black carbon graphic. Four countries propose Arctic fuel measure to cut black carbon from shipping  

Proposal to IMO's PPR 13 meeting aims to establish fuel regulations under MARPOL Annex VI.

T&E chart 1. Spain, Norway and Denmark lead Europe's green shipping fuel production, study finds  

Regulatory uncertainty prevents most e-fuel projects from progressing beyond the planning stage, says analysis.