Wed 22 Oct 2008, 09:42 GMT

Ship emission warning for marine insurers


Increased legislation could fuel the next wave of environmental claims.



Increased regulatory and legislative efforts to reduce air pollution from oceangoing vessels could fuel the next wave of environmental claims for marine insurers, according to marine environment and insurance sources.

Driven by a growing concern that emissions from ships, particularly diesel particulate matter, make up some of the most toxic air pollutants and are the cause of many health problems such as asthma and lower pulmonary function among children, regulators have stepped up their scrutiny of ship emissions.

In recent years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and a host of local, state and federal agencies have made air pollution control in communities along the U.S. coastlines and ports, such as Los Angeles, Houston and New York, a high priority. Some experts say the lawmakers and federal environmental agencies have turned their attention toward ships also because they believe the marine industry has ignored existing emission standards and have managed to avoid the same level of scrutiny as other stationary contributors of toxic pollutants, such as coal-fired power plants.

Frances Keeler, a California attorney who specializes in environmental law, recently told a gathering of marine underwriters that regulators are increasingly showing a willingness to push new boundaries in order to rein in serious violators of air pollution standards.

“The Department of Justice is saying that Clean Air Act violations are not being taken seriously enough and that they need to be brought up to the same level as Clean Water Act violations,” Keeler told the underwriters. “So, they’re looking to slowly make examples of companies and increase the penalties and increase the fines. That’s what you’re going to see as an industry as a whole.”

The situation has taken on new urgency not only in the United States, but around the maritime world. In recent weeks, member states of the International Maritime Organization have adopted international standards for marine diesel engines and their fuels. The revised standards call for a gradual reduction in allowable ship emissions of sulphur oxides (SOx) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), and will impact ship operators and owners, marine diesel engine manufacturers, marine fuel suppliers and several associated industries.

Still, Elena Craft, an air quality specialist with the Environmental Defense Fund, a not-for-profit group that partners with businesses and governments to find solutions to environmental problems, said while the IMO’s actions are commendable, the adopted emission standards don’t go far enough. One of Craft’s major quarrels is that it doesn’t address greenhouse gas emission.

Another is that IMO’s ship emission standards won’t take effect until 2015. “We can’t afford to wait until then. We need to address the problem today. We needed it yesterday,” she said.

What’s clear is that states like California, America’s smog capital, are not going to wait for these standards to take effect. Already, California is enforcing its own Clean Air Act, which is more stringent than the federal act. The state has given considerable authority to the California Air Resources Board to regulate mobile emission sources.

Regulators are desperate for solutions and quick fixes, which may spell trouble for marine insurers and their insureds, said Keeler. “They’ll try anything to get reductions. And so they’re pushing that envelope constantly. They’re always going out there and they’re not going to let up,” she said.

Fines, for instance, have recently gone up sharply. "Typically, I was looking at fines of $1,000, but it’s gone up to $3,000 and $5,000. The last one I settled, they wanted $20,000 and we settled for $15,000," Keeler said.

And until recently, air pollution violations were hardly prosecuted. Now, Keeler said the government is bringing criminal penalties against some offenders. "I’m seeing them now, whether it’s a marine source or a land-based source. I’m working on a case now where they’re going for a criminal indictment and they want a $5 million fine. It's not been heard of in the criminal arena," she said.


Arctic Tern vessel. Wallenius Wilhelmsen takes delivery of first methanol-ready Shaper Class vessel  

The dual-fuel Arctic Tern will enter service on the Asia–Europe trade almost immediately.

Al Muraykh vessel. Hapag-Lloyd signs shore power agreement with Hamburg Port Authority  

Deal commits the carrier to using onshore power supply at all Hamburg terminals.

Dorthe Karin Bendtsen, KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect reports 21% rise in pre-tax earnings for 2025/26  

Marine fuel firm delivers 13 million tonnes and expands carbon markets capabilities amid geopolitical turbulence.

VTTI logo. VTTI Dalian completes first large-scale 'green methanol' vessel loading  

Cargo to be supplied as marine fuel in Shanghai.

Steff Tan, Oilmar. Oilmar appoints Steff Tan as marine fuels trader in Singapore  

New hire's background spans bunker operations, logistics, commercial trading, marketing, and business development.

Feng Da Hai vessel. Cosco Shipping adds methanol-ready bulk carrier Feng Da Hai to fleet  

The 64,000-tonne vessel is equipped with a methanol fuel system for future low-carbon operations.

Oilmar office in Dubai. Oilmar welcomes summer intern to Dubai branch  

Arpit Aryan will rotate across the bunker fuel trading, finance and operations departments.

Aerial view of the Dubai skyline. Oilmar takes on trading and finance intern in Dubai  

New intern to rotate across trading, operations and finance teams.

Seaspan and Maersk signing. Seaspan and Maersk deepen fleet efficiency collaboration with $75m upgrade programme  

Retrofit package for four 13,000-teu vessels includes installation of shaft generator to reduce auxiliary engine fuel consumption.

European Parliament building in Brussels. EU Parliament vote on soy biofuels could expose bloc to $5.6bn a year in trade sanctions  

MEPs reject regulation that would have phased out soy biofuels, risking WTO retaliation penalties.