Wed 22 May 2013, 08:16 GMT

36 vessels could pose oil pollution threat


Sunken vessels are recommended for further assessment and potential removal of fuel oil.



The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has presented a new report to the U.S. Coast Guard, which finds that 36 sunken vessels scattered across the U.S. seafloor could pose an oil pollution threat to the nation's coastal marine resources. Of those, 17 were recommended for further assessment and potential removal of both fuel oil and oil cargo.

The sunken vessels are a legacy of more than a century of U.S. commerce and warfare. They include a barge lost in rough seas in 1936; two motor-powered ships that sank in separate collisions in 1947 and 1952; and a tanker that exploded and sank in 1984. The remaining sites are 13 merchant marine ships lost during World War II, primarily along the Atlantic Seaboard and Gulf of Mexico.

To see a list of the ships and their locations, visit: http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/protect/ppw/.

The report, part of NOAA’s Remediation of Underwater Legacy Environmental Threats (RULET) project, identifies the location and nature of potential sources of oil pollution from sunken vessels.

"Knowing where these vessels are helps oil response planning efforts and may help in the investigation of reported mystery spills--sightings of oil where a source is not immediately known or suspected," NOAA said.

"This report is the most comprehensive assessment to date of the potential oil pollution threats from shipwrecks in U.S. waters," said Lisa Symons, resource protection coordinator for NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. "Now that we have analyzed this data, the Coast Guard will be able to evaluate NOAA’s recommendations and determine the most appropriate response to potential threats."

"The Coast Guard is pleased to receive these risk assessments from our partner agency NOAA and looks forward to our continued coordination on the matter of potential pollution associated with sunken vessels in U.S. waters,”" said Captain John Caplis, the Coast Guard’s chief of marine environmental response. "Coast Guard federal on-scene coordinators receiving the risk assessments will carefully review the data and incorporate it into their area contingency plans."

In 2010, Congress appropriated $1 million for NOAA to develop a list of the most significant potentially polluting wrecks in U.S. waters, including the Great Lakes, specifically addressing ecological and socio-economic resources at risk. Those funds were not intended for oil or vessel removal.

NOAA maintains the internal Resources and UnderSea Threats (RUST) database of approximately 30,000 sites of sunken material, of which 20,000 are shipwrecks. The remaining items are munitions dumpsites, navigational obstructions, underwater archaeological sites, and other underwater resources.

Initial screening of these shipwrecks revealed 573 that could pose substantial pollution risks, based on the vessel’s age, type, and size. This includes vessels built after 1891, when U.S. vessels began using fuel oil; vessels built of steel; vessels over 1,000 gross tons, and any tank vessel.

Additional research about the circumstances of each vessel’s loss narrowed that number to 107 shipwrecks. Of those, some were deemed navigational hazards and demolished, and others were salvaged. Most of the 107 wrecks have not been directly surveyed for pollution potential, and in some cases little is known about their current condition.

To prioritize and determine which vessels are candidates for further evaluation, NOAA used a series of risk factors to assess the likelihood of substantial amounts of oil remaining onboard, and the potential ecological and environmental effects if that oil spills. Risk factors included the total oil volume onboard as cargo or fuel, the type of oil, and the nature of the sinking event. For example, a vessel that was struck by multiple torpedoes would likely contain less oil than a vessel that sank in bad weather.

After this third level of screening, 87 wrecks remained on the list developed for the Coast Guard’s area contingency plans. Among this group, NOAA determined that 36 shipwrecks are candidates for a 'worst case' discharge event in which the shipwreck’s entire fuel oil and oil cargo would be released simultaneously, and recommended that 17 of these wrecks be considered for further assessment and feasibility of oil removal.

Six wrecks are considered potential candidates for a 'most probable' discharge event, where a shipwreck could lose approximately 10 percent of its fuel oil or oil cargo. To date, known oil discharges from shipwrecks are typically in the 'most probable' category or smaller.

"The report, including 87 risk assessments, is not intended to direct Coast Guard activities, but rather provide the Coast Guard with NOAA’s scientific and technical assessment and guidance as a natural resource and cultural heritage trustee," NOAA said.

The Coast Guard, as the federal On-scene Coordinator for mitigating oil spills in the coastal marine environment, the Regional Response Teams, and local Area Committees, as established under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, will review and incorporate the assessments into regional and area marine environmental response contingency plans. The individual risk assessments not only highlight concerns about potential ecological and socio-economic impacts, but also characterize most of the vessels as historically significant and many of them as grave sites, both civilian and military.

Funding for any assessment or recovery operations determined to be necessary is dependent upon the unique circumstances of the wreck. If a wreck still has an identifiable owner, that owner is responsible for the cost of cleanup. Coast Guard officials say that if no responsible party exists, the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund would likely be accessed.

To view the report, 2012 Risk Assessment for Potentially Polluting Wrecks in U.S. Waters, visit http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/protect/ppw/.


Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC) and CMA CGM logos. Capital Clean Energy Carriers and CMA CGM form joint venture to build $82.8m LNG bunkering vessel  

The 20,000-cbm dual-fuel vessel is due for delivery in the third quarter of 2028.

Hong Kong flag. Hong Kong launches port dues and vessel registration incentives to boost green fuel bunkering  

Two new schemes offer financial concessions to attract green fuel vessels and grow the Hong Kong fleet.

Mein Schiff Flow vessel. Fincantieri delivers LNG-ready cruise ship Mein Schiff Flow to TUI Cruises  

The 160,000 gross-tonne vessel is the second of two InTUItion-class dual-fuel ships.

Monjasa logo. Monjasa seeks trader for Fredericia-based Northwest Europe desk  

Bunker firm is recruiting a trader to join its Northwest Europe team.

Port of Barcelona and Port of Shanghai signing ceremony. Barcelona and Shanghai sign strategic port cooperation agreement targeting green fuels and digital corridors  

Ports formalise a 'sister ports' relationship covering green shipping, digitalisation and intermodality.

Capital's LNG-powered vessel. Chinese shipbuilder delivers 155,500-dwt LNG dual-fuel crude oil tanker  

Vessel handed over to Capital Ship Management Corp in China.

Glovis Lighthouse vessel. Seaspan takes delivery of first 10,800-ceu dual-fuel LNG car carrier  

Glovis Lighthouse enters service as one of a handful of vessels globally to exceed 10,000 CEU capacity.

Port of Rotterdam, Maersk, Core Power and Lloyd's Register logos. Rotterdam study maps pathway for nuclear-powered commercial ship port calls  

A joint study by Lloyd's Register, the Port of Rotterdam, Core Power and Maersk examines the feasibility of nuclear vessel port calls.

Hakata waterfront. Kinkai Yusen conducts first biofuel demonstration on domestic ro-ro vessel at Hakata Port  

Japanese shipping company to trial B24 biofuel blend aboard the vessel Nanotsu on 16 June.

Norwegian Energy Trading (NET) AS logo. Norwegian Energy Trading renews ISCC certification for biofuel trading  

Norwegian bunker trader says renewal reflects growing biofuel volumes and commitment to verifiable sustainability standards.