Wed 6 Feb 2013, 14:58 GMT

ICS discusses CO2 emissions regulation


Board meets in London to discuss the best means of achieving further CO2 emissions reduction from ships.



The board of directors of the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) - the international trade association and employers' organisation for shipowners - met in London yesterday, February 5, to discuss key issues, including the best means of achieving further carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction from ships.

The ICS board reviewed recent developments with respect to the international regulation of CO2 emissions from ships. This included proposals by the United States, the European Commission, and others, concerning the establishment of a mandatory system of Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of emissions (known as ‘MRV’).

ICS Chairman, Masamichi Morooka [pictured], remarked: "Our meeting agreed that ICS will fully support the concept of MRV, provided that any measure adopted is developed and agreed at IMO, and that it will be simple to administer and primarily based on fuel consumption measured by bunker delivery notes."

"However," added Mr Morooka, "ICS support for the development of an MRV mechanism does not imply acceptance of MRV being used for the eventual development of any other Market Based Measure, or the mandatory application of energy indexing measures to existing ships."

The ICS said it is currently developing a detailed position on how MRV might work, but is waiting for formal submissions to be made by governments at the next meeting of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee in May.

The ICS said it was optimistic that "the United States will submit a paper to IMO that will address some (though not all) of the concerns previously raised by ICS in response to earlier US proposals made last year. In particular, it is hoped that the US will acknowledge the central role of bunker delivery notes, and that it will avoid any suggestion that expensive or impractical emission monitoring equipment should be installed on board ships (as has been suggested by some elements within the European Commission)."

The trade association added: "IMO has already adopted a comprehensive package of technical and operational measures to reduce CO2 emissions, and shipping is the only industry which already has CO2 reduction regulations in force at a global level. ICS therefore welcomes the recent announcement by the European Commission that if further measures are developed to address CO2 that this should be done globally inside the IMO."

Commenting on the issue of regional Market Based Measures (MBMs), the ICS said: "At their meeting, ICS members’ noted with satisfaction that, for the time being at least, it seems that the EU will give much less emphasis to developing its own Market Based Measure on a regional basis (including a mooted regional emissions trading scheme for ships) and that as an interim measure the EU instead wishes to focus on a global system of MRV."

Morooka commented: “This constructive stance now being taken by Europe is very positive. But with respect to MRV, we are still waiting to see if firm proposals will be made at IMO by the European Commission. At consultations we have attended in Brussels, some EU officials from the Climate Change Directorate still seem to be thinking in terms of a developing a regional measure first. In the absence of firm EU proposals being submitted to IMO it is difficult for industry to contribute to the MRV debate at European level meaningfully. This is something which ICS is very keen to do.”

The ICS added: "Notwithstanding ICS’s support for MRV, its priority remains to help ensure that the technical and operational measures adopted by IMO, which came into force in January 2013, are successfully implemented. This includes the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) and the mandatory use of Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plans (SEEMP). ICS believes that the further reduction in emissions that will be delivered by the SEEMP, which are now being utilised by tens of thousands of existing ships worldwide, should not be understated."


Flag of Brazil. Petrobras resumes bunkering operations at Rio Grande Terminal after power restoration  

Brazilian supplier restarts marine fuel supply after completing an inspection following an electricity outage.

Stena E-Flexer vessel render. Stena RoRo orders battery-ready E-Flexer 2.0 ferries from Chinese yard  

Vessels include diesel engines capable of running on biodiesel and are methanol-ready.

BW Gemini vessel. Nord Gas Solutions to supply cargo and fuel systems for eight BW LPG VLGCs  

Gas-handling systems specialist awarded contract for new 90,000-cbm vessels.

Kingston Trader vessel. TFG Marine fits mass flow meter to Jamaica-bound bunker barge  

Kingston Trader becomes the first Caribbean bunkering vessel with mass flow metering as TFG Marine’s fleet coverage nears 90%.

Sebastian Vasquez and Camilo Angulo Ferrand, Monjasa. Monjasa announces full-chain marine fuel operations in Cartagena  

Monjasa says it now covers the entire marine fuel supply chain in Colombia, from oil wells to ship-side deliveries.

Steel-cutting ceremony for vessel with builder's hull no. H619. Ceremonies held for Van Oord’s methanol-hybrid rock installation vessels  

Two ships advance through parallel construction at China’s CIMC Raffles shipyard.

WK NatPower and AREL MoU signing. Wah Kwong NatPower signs MoU to explore Hong Kong marine electrification  

Venture will examine shore power, vessel charging and electric vessel deployment around Aberdeen’s waterfront.

Vard 4 39 design render. Dong Fang Offshore orders CSOV with battery-hybrid propulsion  

Vard secures fifth newbuild contract from Taiwanese firm, with delivery scheduled for 2028.

Rock Star vessel. CSL and OWL launch first subsea rock installation vessel for offshore wind  

MV Rock Star can run on MGO and methanol and is designed to support scour protection and cable burial for offshore wind projects.

François Michel and Andy McKeran. Lloyd’s Register study backs 200,000-cbm LNG carriers for fleet renewal  

Analysis finds larger LNG carriers could cut transport costs while retaining access to most major terminals.