This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 6 Jul 2009, 07:51 GMT

Swire Shipping denies bunker spill payment claims


Operator says it wishes to achieve a 'mutually acceptable solution' regarding a cleanup payment.



Swire Shipping, the operator of the Pacific Adventurer, has rejected assertions that it is not prepared to cover the cost of a 270-tonne bunker spill off Australia's Moreton Island [pictured], which resulted from the vessel's loss of containers during Cyclone Hamish.

The company said that it is in discussions with the State and Federal Transport Ministers and has written to Premier Anna Bligh saying that it wishes to achieve a "mutually acceptable solution" in line with its commitment to the people of Queensland.

"From the beginning, the company has always promised to meet its full responsibilities under Australian law for the accident clean-up.

"The company has not stated it would cover all costs. All costs are still unknown and there is a limit to the amount of claims the company and its insurers can accept," Swire Shipping said in a statement.

According to Queensland state Premier Anna Bligh, lawyers for Swire Shipping had informed the state government that the company only intends to pay the $US17 million required under international maritime conventions, leaving taxpayers to pay the rest of the estimated $US27 million despite previous assurances that it would pay above the cap.

"As the Queensland Government is aware, Australia is a party to the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (the LLMC Convention) which limits the liability of a ship-owner for third party claims. In the case of the Pacific Adventurer, the Convention limits this liability to the equivalent of approximately A$14.5 million. The Federal Government Minister for Transport, the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, has reaffirmed the applicability of this limit since the Pacific Adventurer incident," Swire Shipping said.

The company added that the ship's insurer has already provided financial security to the Government by a letter of undertaking for up to A$20 million.

In addition, Swire Shipping said that immediately following the bunker spill it had provided $2 million of assistance with the clean-up. The company added that its oil pollution experts had flown from the Middle East and it had imported specialist equipment which was donated to the Government.

"The reason for the LLMC Convention is to place an upper limit on ship-owners' potential liability for a fuel oil spill. If ship-owners faced unlimited liability for such spills, the additional cost of insurance would result in a significant increase in freight rates, which would have a negative impact on international trade. Australian exports and imports would have to carry this additional cost," Swire Shipping said.

"Any decision by Swire Shipping to offer compensation that is significantly above the limit determined by the LLMC Convention would risk becoming a precedent in international law. As a result, insurance premiums and freight rates could rise significantly.

"Swire Shipping wishes to express its sincere regret to the people of Queensland for the oil spill. The company is committed to resolving the matter in a fair and equitable manner and remains ready to discuss it with the Premier of Queensland," the company added.


Tangier Maersk vessel. Maersk completes first US ethanol bunkering of a deep-sea container ship  

Shipper tests US-produced corn ethanol as a marine fuel aboard the Tangier Maersk.

CMA CGM Alceste naming ceremony. CMA CGM names methanol-powered vessel after Molière’s Alceste  

Ship features a MAN B&W 8G85ME two-stroke engine configured to run on conventional marine fuel and methanol.

Cutaway illustration of a battery-electric ship. Why batteries still cannot power ships across oceans  

Battery-electric ships dominate short-sea routes, but energy-density and infrastructure constraints keep deep-sea propulsion out of reach.

VPS logo. VPS to run marine fuel management course in Singapore  

Two-day programme in November covers fuel handling, testing and decarbonisation rules, including a laboratory tour.

Rio de Janeiro aerial view. Petrobras launches HSFO bunker sales in Rio de Janeiro  

Brazilian supplier begins prompt HSFO deliveries in Rio, pricing the fuel more than $80 per tonne below VLSFO.

Launching ceremony of MSC Alina X. Changhong International launches eighth LNG dual-fuel container ship for MSC  

10,300-TEU vessel is designed to meet ammonia- and methanol-ready specifications.

Kokuryu Maru vessel. Japan completes first methanol-fuelled coastal vessel and conducts inaugural bunkering  

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Kokuka Sangyo and Hanshin Diesel Works mark the completion of methanol-fuelled chemical tanker Kokuryu Maru.

Eleven Energy logo. Eleven Energy recruiting trader for new Singapore office  

Saudi bunkering firm looking to hire in Asian city-state ahead of planned January 2027 start date.

Singapore skyline. VPS advertises for bunker surveyor role in Singapore  

Testing and inspection firm seeks candidate to conduct bunker fuel surveys under Singapore Standards SS 648 and SS 600.

RCL vessels naming ceremony. RCL names first three of eight dual-fuel-ready 4,488-TEU vessels in China  

Regional Container Lines takes delivery of Anitta Bhum on day of naming ceremony.


↑  Back to Top


 Recommended