This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Mon 6 Jul 2009, 07:51 GMT

Swire Shipping denies bunker spill payment claims


Operator says it wishes to achieve a 'mutually acceptable solution' regarding a cleanup payment.



Swire Shipping, the operator of the Pacific Adventurer, has rejected assertions that it is not prepared to cover the cost of a 270-tonne bunker spill off Australia's Moreton Island [pictured], which resulted from the vessel's loss of containers during Cyclone Hamish.

The company said that it is in discussions with the State and Federal Transport Ministers and has written to Premier Anna Bligh saying that it wishes to achieve a "mutually acceptable solution" in line with its commitment to the people of Queensland.

"From the beginning, the company has always promised to meet its full responsibilities under Australian law for the accident clean-up.

"The company has not stated it would cover all costs. All costs are still unknown and there is a limit to the amount of claims the company and its insurers can accept," Swire Shipping said in a statement.

According to Queensland state Premier Anna Bligh, lawyers for Swire Shipping had informed the state government that the company only intends to pay the $US17 million required under international maritime conventions, leaving taxpayers to pay the rest of the estimated $US27 million despite previous assurances that it would pay above the cap.

"As the Queensland Government is aware, Australia is a party to the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (the LLMC Convention) which limits the liability of a ship-owner for third party claims. In the case of the Pacific Adventurer, the Convention limits this liability to the equivalent of approximately A$14.5 million. The Federal Government Minister for Transport, the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, has reaffirmed the applicability of this limit since the Pacific Adventurer incident," Swire Shipping said.

The company added that the ship's insurer has already provided financial security to the Government by a letter of undertaking for up to A$20 million.

In addition, Swire Shipping said that immediately following the bunker spill it had provided $2 million of assistance with the clean-up. The company added that its oil pollution experts had flown from the Middle East and it had imported specialist equipment which was donated to the Government.

"The reason for the LLMC Convention is to place an upper limit on ship-owners' potential liability for a fuel oil spill. If ship-owners faced unlimited liability for such spills, the additional cost of insurance would result in a significant increase in freight rates, which would have a negative impact on international trade. Australian exports and imports would have to carry this additional cost," Swire Shipping said.

"Any decision by Swire Shipping to offer compensation that is significantly above the limit determined by the LLMC Convention would risk becoming a precedent in international law. As a result, insurance premiums and freight rates could rise significantly.

"Swire Shipping wishes to express its sincere regret to the people of Queensland for the oil spill. The company is committed to resolving the matter in a fair and equitable manner and remains ready to discuss it with the Premier of Queensland," the company added.


Aerial view of container vessel at sea. Seaspan and Technolog unveil LNG feeder design with four-week ammonia conversion pathway  

Lloyd’s Register grants approval for a 3,370 TEU vessel concept designed for swift transition to zero-carbon fuel.

David Foo, MPA. Singapore’s MPA backs LNG as part of multi-fuel strategy for shipping decarbonisation  

Authority emphasises regulatory frameworks and workforce development as sector navigates geopolitical uncertainty and energy transition.

ABS and PIL sign MoU. ABS and PIL partner on book-and-claim emissions verification  

Classification society to verify fuel consumption and emissions data for shipping line’s alternative fuel claims.

Biofuel bunkering at Port of Açu. Vast completes first biofuel bunkering of tugboat at Brazil’s Port of Açu  

Be8’s BeVant biofuel claims up to 99% CO₂ reduction versus conventional marine diesel.

China’s Da Qing 268 vessel. Ningbo-Zhoushan Port completes first ship-to-ship green methanol bunkering  

Zhejiang province port facility delivered 503 tonnes of methanol to a container ship in one hour.

Ole Sloth Hansen and Arne Lohmann Rasmussen. KPI OceanConnect launches podcast series on bunker markets and geopolitical risk  

Marine fuel supplier debuts audio series examining commodity markets, trade route disruptions and Middle East tensions.

Auramarine biofuels webinar. Auramarine to host webinar on biofuels as a marine decarbonisation solution  

Finnish firm's May event will explore current biofuel options and integration strategies for vessels.

Thomas Bondesen, Christian Ramsdal and Jeanette Rathje, Malik Group. Malik adds bunker trader, technology head and canteen worker  

Danish marine fuels group expands team with three appointments across commercial, technical and operational functions.

Marine Money 2026 forum. AET outlines multi-fuel decarbonisation strategy at Marine Money 2026  

Tanker operator highlights innovative commercial arrangements with charterers to share decarbonisation risks and rewards.

Titan Optimus alongside Peony Leader vessel. Titan Clean Fuels completes first FuelEU Maritime pooling exercise with DNV verification  

Pool included several hundred vessels, with LNG and biomethane helping balance compliance deficits.


↑  Back to Top


 Recommended