This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 29 May 2018, 14:45 GMT

CMA CGM posts 'very sharp rise' in bunker costs, Q1 loss


Bunker expenses and fuel oil prices up 17% and 19.4% respectively.


The 18,000 container capacity CMA CGM Kergeulen.
Image credit: CMA CGM
CMA CGM reports that it recorded a "very sharp rise" in bunker expenses during the first quarter (Q1) of 2018 as the company posted a loss (after tax) of $67.2 million.

Marine fuel costs between January and March were up 17 percent year-on-year (YoY), whilst fuel oil prices rose by 19.4 percent, CMA CGM said.

Expenses for bunker fuel and consumables increased by $191.2m, or 32.0 percent, to $788.6m, up from the previous year's figure of $597.4m.

CMA CGM said the overall increase in Q1 operating expenses - by $954.8m, or 22.5 percent, to $5,192.2m - was principally due to higher bunker prices and an increase of volumes carried.

Revenue for the period grew YoY by $791.2m, or 17.1 percent, to $5,411.4m.

The operating profit indicator, EBIT, fell $144.5m, or 55.7 percent, to $115.1m.

CMA CGM's core EBIT was $88m - a YoY decline of $163.6m, or 64.9 percent. But the Marseille-headquartered firm was keen to emphasize that its core EBIT margin of +1.6 percent was "one of the best in the industry", despite "a highly deteriorated environment, affected by a very sharp rise in unit bunker costs".

Commenting on the results, Rodolphe Saade, chairman and CEO of CMA CGM Group, observed: "The shipping industry is experiencing sustained growth but was hit in the first quarter by the sharp increase in bunker prices. In this environment, CMA CGM succeeded in recording a strong increase both in volumes transported and in revenue, while maintaining a positive core EBIT margin, thus demonstrating once again the relevance of our strategy. Volumes should remain high throughout the year. In order to deal with the increase in bunker prices, which continue to rise into the second quarter, we are implementing an exceptional surcharge.

"The CMA CGM Group will continue its development strategy for its customers both in maritime transportation and in building end-to-end solutions, while pursuing its digital transformation and strengthening the expertise of its teams."


Arctic Tern vessel. Wallenius Wilhelmsen takes delivery of first methanol-ready Shaper Class vessel  

The dual-fuel Arctic Tern will enter service on the Asia–Europe trade almost immediately.

Al Muraykh vessel. Hapag-Lloyd signs shore power agreement with Hamburg Port Authority  

Deal commits the carrier to using onshore power supply at all Hamburg terminals.

Dorthe Karin Bendtsen, KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect reports 21% rise in pre-tax earnings for 2025/26  

Marine fuel firm delivers 13 million tonnes and expands carbon markets capabilities amid geopolitical turbulence.

VTTI logo. VTTI Dalian completes first large-scale 'green methanol' vessel loading  

Cargo to be supplied as marine fuel in Shanghai.

Steff Tan, Oilmar. Oilmar appoints Steff Tan as marine fuels trader in Singapore  

New hire's background spans bunker operations, logistics, commercial trading, marketing, and business development.

Feng Da Hai vessel. Cosco Shipping adds methanol-ready bulk carrier Feng Da Hai to fleet  

The 64,000-tonne vessel is equipped with a methanol fuel system for future low-carbon operations.

Oilmar office in Dubai. Oilmar welcomes summer intern to Dubai branch  

Arpit Aryan will rotate across the bunker fuel trading, finance and operations departments.

Aerial view of the Dubai skyline. Oilmar takes on trading and finance intern in Dubai  

New intern to rotate across trading, operations and finance teams.

Seaspan and Maersk signing. Seaspan and Maersk deepen fleet efficiency collaboration with $75m upgrade programme  

Retrofit package for four 13,000-teu vessels includes installation of shaft generator to reduce auxiliary engine fuel consumption.

European Parliament building in Brussels. EU Parliament vote on soy biofuels could expose bloc to $5.6bn a year in trade sanctions  

MEPs reject regulation that would have phased out soy biofuels, risking WTO retaliation penalties.


↑  Back to Top