Thu 8 Aug 2024 12:27 | Updated: Thu 8 Aug 2024 12:28

Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit


Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.


A Maersk vessel, pictured from above.
Maersk saw net profit tumble $723m in Q2 as marine fuel expenses climbed $408m. Image: Maersk

Maersk reports that bunker costs increased year-on-year (YoY) by $408m in the second quarter (Q2) of 2024.

Fuel expenses in Q2 amounted to $1.85bn — a rise of 28.3% on the $1.44bn posted for the corresponding period in 2023.

Excluding the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) effect of $28m, Maersk noted that bunker costs had risen by 26%. This was said to be partly due to a YoY growth in fuel consumption of 430,000 tonnes, or 17.7%, to 2.862m tonnes as a result of ship reroutings via the Cape of Good Hope. The second reason being the $44 — or 7.4% — uptick in the average bunker price to $636 per tonne, compared to the previous year's figure of $592.


Chart: Bunker Index. Data: Maersk

Q2 bunker consumption for Maersk, 2020-2024

Bunker consumption in '000 tonnes.

YearBunker consumption ('000 tonnes)
20202333
20212725
20222651
20232432
20242862

Table: Bunker Index. Data: Maersk

Q2 average bunker price for Maersk, 2020-2024

Average bunker price in $ per tonne.

YearBunker price ($/mt)
2020328
2021475
2022827
2023592
2024636

Table: Bunker Index. Data: Maersk

In its financial results, the Ocean division's operating earnings (EBITDA) declined YoY by $852m, or 37.7%, to $1.407bn, and profit before financial items (EBIT) fell $735m, or 61.0%, to $470m.

As regards overall group performance, Maersk posted a net underlying profit of $623m — a decrease of $723m, or 53.7%.

In its guidance for the rest of 2024, Maersk said a $100 change in the price of bunker fuel would lead to the group's EBIT varying by $0.2bn.


Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.

Bunker delivery at anchorage. Bunker Holding launches carbon insetting capability  

Supplier aims to help buyers overcome the relative higher cost of alternative fuels via cost sharing.


↑  Back to Top