Thu 8 Aug 2024, 12:27 GMT | Updated: Thu 8 Aug 2024, 12:28 GMT

Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit


Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.


A Maersk vessel, pictured from above.
Maersk saw net profit tumble $723m in Q2 as marine fuel expenses climbed $408m. Image credit: Maersk

Maersk reports that bunker costs increased year-on-year (YoY) by $408m in the second quarter (Q2) of 2024.

Fuel expenses in Q2 amounted to $1.85bn — a rise of 28.3% on the $1.44bn posted for the corresponding period in 2023.

Excluding the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) effect of $28m, Maersk noted that bunker costs had risen by 26%. This was said to be partly due to a YoY growth in fuel consumption of 430,000 tonnes, or 17.7%, to 2.862m tonnes as a result of ship reroutings via the Cape of Good Hope. The second reason being the $44 — or 7.4% — uptick in the average bunker price to $636 per tonne, compared to the previous year's figure of $592.


Chart: Bunker Index. Data credit: Maersk

Q2 bunker consumption for Maersk, 2020-2024

Bunker consumption in '000 tonnes.

YearBunker consumption ('000 tonnes)
20202333
20212725
20222651
20232432
20242862

Table: Bunker Index. Data credit: Maersk

Q2 average bunker price for Maersk, 2020-2024

Average bunker price in $ per tonne.

YearBunker price ($/mt)
2020328
2021475
2022827
2023592
2024636

Table: Bunker Index. Data credit: Maersk

In its financial results, the Ocean division's operating earnings (EBITDA) declined YoY by $852m, or 37.7%, to $1.407bn, and profit before financial items (EBIT) fell $735m, or 61.0%, to $470m.

As regards overall group performance, Maersk posted a net underlying profit of $623m — a decrease of $723m, or 53.7%.

In its guidance for the rest of 2024, Maersk said a $100 change in the price of bunker fuel would lead to the group's EBIT varying by $0.2bn.



VPS logo. NE Atlantic ECA will cause significant change to the current fuel mix | Steve Bee, VPS  

The possibility of off-spec issues highlights the continuing need for proactive fuel testing to protect vessels.

Kris Vedat, SmartSea. Smart ships failing to convert data into actionable intelligence, warns SmartSea  

Maritime technology firm claims vessels collect vast amounts of data but lack integration to support decision-making.

Energy Transition Outlook 2026 Hydrogen To 2060 report cover. DNV forecasts 100-fold growth in clean hydrogen by 2060, with China leading expansion  

Classification society projects $3.2tn investment in hydrogen sector, with maritime accounting for 15% of clean hydrogen use.

World Shipping Council logo. Dual-fuel container ship and vehicle carrier fleet surpasses 1,200 vessels  

World Shipping Council reports 65% year-on-year increase in operational dual-fuel vessels to 440 ships.

Sotiris Raptis, ECSA. European Shipowners calls for ETS revenue investment and fuel supplier mandate  

ECSA urges the EU to invest €9bn in annual ETS revenues in fuel production and infrastructure.

Sheen Mao Choong, SSA. Singapore bunker industry urged to prioritise resilience and collaboration  

SSA committee vice chair highlights energy security and crisis readiness at Marine Fuels Forum 2026.

Chia How Khee, TFG Marine and David Foo, MPA. TFG Marine receives bunker safety award from Singapore maritime authority  

Marine fuel supplier recognised for safety standards and operational performance at MPA Marine Fuel Forum.

Rotterdam skyline at night. Bunker surveyor sought in Rotterdam to meet increased demand  

Dutch firm MCE Marine Surveyors is recruiting for a quantitative fuel inspection role.

Emma Roberts, BHP. GCMD highlights BHP biofuel trials to address scaling challenges in maritime decarbonisation  

Mining company discusses need for traceability and coordinated progress across supply, cost and operational readiness.

Levante LNG vessel. Peninsula implements energy efficiency measures across bunker supply fleet  

Marine fuel supplier focusing on data-driven upgrades and operational measures to cut consumption.