Thu 8 Aug 2024 12:27 | Updated: Thu 8 Aug 2024 12:28

Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit


Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.


A Maersk vessel, pictured from above.
Maersk saw net profit tumble $723m in Q2 as marine fuel expenses climbed $408m. Image: Maersk

Maersk reports that bunker costs increased year-on-year (YoY) by $408m in the second quarter (Q2) of 2024.

Fuel expenses in Q2 amounted to $1.85bn — a rise of 28.3% on the $1.44bn posted for the corresponding period in 2023.

Excluding the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) effect of $28m, Maersk noted that bunker costs had risen by 26%. This was said to be partly due to a YoY growth in fuel consumption of 430,000 tonnes, or 17.7%, to 2.862m tonnes as a result of ship reroutings via the Cape of Good Hope. The second reason being the $44 — or 7.4% — uptick in the average bunker price to $636 per tonne, compared to the previous year's figure of $592.


Chart: Bunker Index. Data: Maersk

Q2 bunker consumption for Maersk, 2020-2024

Bunker consumption in '000 tonnes.

YearBunker consumption ('000 tonnes)
20202333
20212725
20222651
20232432
20242862

Table: Bunker Index. Data: Maersk

Q2 average bunker price for Maersk, 2020-2024

Average bunker price in $ per tonne.

YearBunker price ($/mt)
2020328
2021475
2022827
2023592
2024636

Table: Bunker Index. Data: Maersk

In its financial results, the Ocean division's operating earnings (EBITDA) declined YoY by $852m, or 37.7%, to $1.407bn, and profit before financial items (EBIT) fell $735m, or 61.0%, to $470m.

As regards overall group performance, Maersk posted a net underlying profit of $623m — a decrease of $723m, or 53.7%.

In its guidance for the rest of 2024, Maersk said a $100 change in the price of bunker fuel would lead to the group's EBIT varying by $0.2bn.



MPA and DNV sign MoU. MPA Singapore and DNV renew partnership to advance maritime decarbonisation and digitalisation  

Third MoU renewal focuses on zero-emission fuels, smart-ship systems, and talent development initiatives.

AET and Samsung Heavy Industries logo side by side. AET orders two LNG dual-fuel Suezmax tankers from Samsung Heavy Industries  

Singapore-based tanker operator to expand dual-fuel fleet with vessels featuring advanced efficiency and emissions reduction technologies.

Port of Tallinn and Ports of Stockholm sign MoU. Port of Tallinn and Ports of Stockholm launch green collaboration for fossil fuel-free shipping  

Estonian and Swedish ports sign MoU to promote sustainable maritime transport on Baltic Sea routes.

Grupo Ibaizabal vessel render. NextDF engines achieve 0.9% methane slip for Ibaizabal's LNG bunkering vessel  

Factory tests show methane emissions far below FuelEU Maritime threshold on newbuild.

Steve Esau, Sea-LNG. Sea-LNG welcomes EU transport plan's recognition of methane decarbonisation pathway  

Industry coalition says STIP validates investments in LNG, bio-methane, and e-methane for shipping.

Port of Bell Bay and Bell Bay Industrial Precinct. TasPorts and H2U Group sign MoU to explore green ammonia production at Bell Bay  

Feasibility study to assess 500,000 tonne per year green ammonia facility in northern Tasmania.

Ostend Hydrogen Refuelling Station. JERA Nex bp commissions hydrogen refuelling station at Port of Ostend  

Facility will initially serve Windcat's Hydrocat 48 as part of EU-funded demonstration project.

Methanol bunkering training simulator. Anglo-Eastern launches methanol bunkering simulator with Wärtsilä for seafarer training  

Ship manager introduces simulator and courses to train crew in safe handling of methanol fuel.

ATH Catamba vessel. ATH Trading adds bunker tanker to Angola fleet  

Commodity trader deploys M/T ATH Catamba in Luanda for offshore marine fuel supply operations.

European Union member state flags. Danish Shipping calls for EU to invest ETS revenues in green marine fuel production  

Industry body welcomes Commission's sustainable transport plan but urges concrete action on funding.