Mon 17 Sep 2018, 12:01 GMT

ICS releases 2020 sulphur cap guidance


New 32-page implementation planning document designed to help ensure compliance.


Guy Platten, Secretary General of the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS).
Image credit: International Chamber of Shipping (ICS)
The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) has produced a free guidance on implementation planning for the upcoming 2020 global cap on fuel sulphur content in a move designed to help ensure compliance across the shipping industry.

Apart from the significant additional cost of compliant fuel, ICS says the implementation of the global cap will be far more complex than for the previous introduction of Emission Control Areas (ECAs) due to the sheer magnitude of the switchover to lower-sulphur fuel and the different types of fuel involved.

ICS also notes that there are "continuing uncertainties about the availability, safety and compatibility of compliant fuels in every port worldwide".

The trade association argues that if a ship has a suitably developed implementation plan, then the vessel's crew should be in a better position to demonstrate to Port State Control (PSC) that they have acted in 'good faith' and done everything that could be reasonably expected to achieve full compliance.

"This need to demonstrate good faith could be particularly important in the event that safe and compliant fuels are unavailable in some ports during the initial weeks of implementation," commented ICS Secretary General Guy Platten. "And IMO has provisionally agreed that Port State Control authorities may take into account the ship's implementation plan when verifying compliance with the 0.5% sulphur limit," he added.

The new 32-page ICS guidance explains that the implementation process will need to address the possibility that some ships may need to carry and use more than one type of compliant fuel in order to operate globally.

This, ICS warns, could result in additional challenges - such as compatibility between different available grades of fuel - that could have significant implications for the safety of the ship as well as its commercial operation.

While ICS notes that it is committed to helping to make the 2020 sulphur cap a success, the London-based association stresses that the full implementation picture is far from complete, and that primary responsibility for ensuring that compliant and compatible fuels will be available rests with oil suppliers, as well as those IMO member states which have collectively agreed to implement this major regulatory change in 2020.

ICS also says it wants to see more progress by governments on addressing safety issues - including "serious concerns" about the fuel quality of new blended fuel oils - at the next meeting of the Maritime Safety Committee in December 2018.

The new ICS guidance, entitled 'Provisional guidance to shipping companies and crews on preparing for compliance with the 2020 global sulphur cap', can be viewed by clicking here.


VPS logo. NE Atlantic ECA will cause significant change to the current fuel mix | Steve Bee, VPS  

The possibility of off-spec issues highlights the continuing need for proactive fuel testing to protect vessels.

Kris Vedat, SmartSea. Smart ships failing to convert data into actionable intelligence, warns SmartSea  

Maritime technology firm claims vessels collect vast amounts of data but lack integration to support decision-making.

Energy Transition Outlook 2026 Hydrogen To 2060 report cover. DNV forecasts 100-fold growth in clean hydrogen by 2060, with China leading expansion  

Classification society projects $3.2tn investment in hydrogen sector, with maritime accounting for 15% of clean hydrogen use.

World Shipping Council logo. Dual-fuel container ship and vehicle carrier fleet surpasses 1,200 vessels  

World Shipping Council reports 65% year-on-year increase in operational dual-fuel vessels to 440 ships.

Sotiris Raptis, ECSA. European Shipowners calls for ETS revenue investment and fuel supplier mandate  

ECSA urges the EU to invest €9bn in annual ETS revenues in fuel production and infrastructure.

Sheen Mao Choong, SSA. Singapore bunker industry urged to prioritise resilience and collaboration  

SSA committee vice chair highlights energy security and crisis readiness at Marine Fuels Forum 2026.

Chia How Khee, TFG Marine and David Foo, MPA. TFG Marine receives bunker safety award from Singapore maritime authority  

Marine fuel supplier recognised for safety standards and operational performance at MPA Marine Fuel Forum.

Rotterdam skyline at night. Bunker surveyor sought in Rotterdam to meet increased demand  

Dutch firm MCE Marine Surveyors is recruiting for a quantitative fuel inspection role.

Emma Roberts, BHP. GCMD highlights BHP biofuel trials to address scaling challenges in maritime decarbonisation  

Mining company discusses need for traceability and coordinated progress across supply, cost and operational readiness.

Levante LNG vessel. Peninsula implements energy efficiency measures across bunker supply fleet  

Marine fuel supplier focusing on data-driven upgrades and operational measures to cut consumption.