Mon 28 Aug 2017, 09:02 GMT

VPS director highlights need for MFM fuel delivery monitoring


First few months following mandatory MFM bunkering shows fuel deliveries require expert performance monitoring, says Steve Bee.



By Steve Bee - Group Commercial & Business Development Director

Recent events in Singapore have seen the Maritime Port Authority (MPA) take strong action against a fuel supplier by revoking their licence, following checks which uncovered unauthorised alterations made to the pipelines on board a number of the supplier's bunker tankers between the mass flow meter (MFM) and the flow boom. Such alterations had allowed bunker fuel measured by the MFM to be siphoned out and undermine the accuracy of the readings from the MFM system.

Such alterations and actions prove there are still individuals within the region who are prepared to risk unauthorised practices in relation to fuel delivery. This is despite the commendable efforts of the MPA to introduce a technology which aims to assist in placing Singapore at the forefront as a transparent, efficient and ethical port in which to deliver and receive bunker fuel.

The above issues also prove that the MFM is not a simple 'plug & play' device, but is an integral part of the wider fuel delivery system. On its own, the MFM is not the sole resolution to past problems, however a greater understanding of the MFM technology, linked to a comprehensive understanding of marine fuel delivery, will certainly ensure best practice can be monitored and reported.

Therefore the role and value of the bunker quantity surveyor has in fact increased within Singapore, rather than the pre-MFM-implementation perception that such a role may diminish.

Within the TR48 technical reference document for bunkering via mass flow meters, the BQS surveyor is highlighted on over 90 occasions, specifically:

- Clause 10.1.5 - mandatory documents to be issued by Surveyor.

- Clause 10.3 - Pre-delivery

- Clause 10.3.6 - Sampling

- Clause 10.4 - Bunkering operation

- Clause 10.5 - Post-delivery Checks and Documentation

- Clause 10.7.1. Metering Stoppage/Failure - 10.7.1.2 - back to manual measurement.

- Clause 10.7.6.1 - Quantity Dispute

- Annex A - Safety Health and the Environment

The role of the surveyor in relation to monitoring fuel deliveries via MFM includes:

Checking :

- MFM approval for 'use in trade', Meter calibration record, Meter zero verification report, Bunker tanker's meter totalizer log, System seals.

- Witness setting of meter reading to zero, Monitor whether stripping is done, Witness meter reading at the end of the bunkering. Obtain copy of Metering Ticket.

- Ascertain vessel's received quantity. Calculate and report vessel's R.O.B.

- Ensure proper sampling is done at the correct location by all concerned and seal numbers recorded on the BDN.

- Quantity differences (+/-) reported, Quantity difference investigated and necessary documents obtained.

- Bunker/meter profile obtained - When agreed between both parties.

Since 2015, VPS Surveyors have been monitoring MFM fuel delivery in Singapore, comparing the vessels manual measurements versus the bunker tanker's MFM measurements. Results recorded between 2015-2016, showed 45% of deliveries agreed within 0.5% of each other and 70% of deliveries within 1% of each other. However, the first six months of 2017 has shown a slight improvement, with 51% of deliveries having a volume agreement between vessel manual measurements and bunker tanker MFM measurement of within +/- 0.5%. The remaining 49% is equally split between apparent gain or loss, to the vessel. This would suggest that in approximately 25% of cases, the vessel is likely to claim a shortage.

The introduction of MFM, as an almost 'black-box' technology, was of course always going to be subject to a potential degree of scepticism from crew inexperienced with such technology. Therefore VPS's employment of an expert flow-technologist and the introduction of services, MFM Quick-Screen and MFM-Full Investigation, were introduced in early 2017 to protect the interest of the fuel purchaser and the crew on-board the receiving vessel.

With respect to the MFM Quick-Screen service, VPS have customers who require field assessment of the MFM profile. This service sees the surveyor collect and check MFM field documents including pictures of the meter profile. Our MFM Technologist, then reviews each case for 23 parameters, highlighting which, if any, could potentially be in breach TR48 and gives a 'pass' or 'fail' rating relative to TR48 requirements.

VPS MFM Quick-Screen data has shown a number of deliveries failing to comply with TR48 due to parameters such as tank stripping, line clearing, low cut-off values (LFC), the minimum measured quantity (MMQ), minimum mass flow rate (Qmin), zero verification and meter totalizer log. Following a MFM Quick-Screen 'fail', VPS can provide a more detailed MFM investigation to comprehensively prove the initial findings, including analysis of the MFM profile ASCII file and transmitter configuration report.

So the first few months following mandatory MFM fuel delivery in Singapore, has shown the whole fuel delivery system, including MFM technology, requires expert performance monitoring and assessment, along with the detailed checking of the relevant documentation. As such, guided by the MPA and TR48 requirements, VPS MFM-Screening and Investigation Services, plus experienced bunker quantity surveyors, can provide the expertise to assist in ensuring receipt of compliant and full fuel deliveries.


Conceptual illustration of high-power marine fuel cell unit. ABB and HDF Energy to develop high-power fuel cells for large ships  

Joint development targets megawatt-scale hydrogen fuel cell units for container feeders and liquefied hydrogen carriers.

Chart showing Singapore TTM bunker sales, Aug '22 - Nov '25. Singapore bunker sales break new ground as TTM volumes surpass 56m tonnes  

Trailing 12-month bunker sales rise to new all-time record at Asian port.

Bow Leopard vessel. Odfjell launches operational green corridor between Brazil and Europe using biofuel  

Chemical tanker operator establishes route using B24 sustainable biofuel without subsidies or government support.

United LNG I vessel. Somtrans christens 8,000-cbm LNG bunker barge for Belgian and Dutch ports  

United LNG I designed for inland waterways and coastal operations up to Zeebrugge.

Photograph of a red container vessel. BIMCO adopts FuelEU Maritime and ETS clauses for ship sales, advances biofuel charter work  

Documentary Committee approves regulatory clauses for vessel transactions, progresses work on decarbonisation and emerging cargo contracts.

ABS, Eneos, NYK Line and Seacor Holdings logos side by side. Four companies launch study for US methanol bunkering network  

ABS, Eneos, NYK Line, and Seacor to develop ship-to-ship methanol supply operations on Gulf Coast.

CMA CGM Antigone naming ceremony. CMA CGM names dual-fuel methanol vessel for Phoenician Express service  

CMA CGM Antigone to operate on BEX2 route connecting Asia, the Middle East and Mediterranean.

Capt. Kevin Wong, Golden Island. Golden Island appoints Capt Kevin Wong as chief operating officer  

Wong to oversee ship management and low-carbon fuel development at Singapore-based marine fuels company.

LPC and Gram Marine launch operations in Argentina graphic. LPC launches Argentine marine lubricants hub with Gram Marine  

Motor Oil Hellas subsidiary partners with maritime services provider to supply products to regional ports.

Chicago Express vessel. Hapag-Lloyd orders eight methanol-powered container ships worth over $500m  

German carrier signs deal with CIMC Raffles for 4,500-teu vessels for 2028-29 delivery.