This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 31 Jul 2018, 13:17 GMT

K Line cites higher bunker costs as key reason for $173m loss


Average bunker price paid jumped 27 percent in Q1.


K Line's car carrier vessel, the Hawaiian Highway.
Image credit: K Line
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) reports that the average bunker price it paid during the firm's first fiscal quarter (Q1), which runs between April and June, rose year-on-year (YoY) by $88, or 27.0 percent, to $414 per metric tonne.

In a sequential comparison with the previous quarter's (January to March) average of $391 per tonne, the result is $23, or 5.9 percent, higher.

K Line has now revised its forecast bunker price for Q2 upwards to $468 per tonne, which if reached would represent a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) increase of $54, or 13.0 percent, and a YoY rise of $146, or 45.3 percent.

For H1, K Line has upped its $376 April prediction to $441 per tonne; the H2 forecast is now $91 higher than three months ago at $460 per tonne; whilst the full-year average estimate has been adjusted to $451 per tonne - $78 more than the last forecast.

According to K Line, each $10 change in the average bunker price will either add or subtract JPY 80 million ($0.7m) to the company's ordinary income.

In its key results for the quarter, K Line posted a loss attributable to owners of JPY 19.27 billion ($172.9m), compared to JPY 8.52bn last year. There was also an operating loss of JPY 13.37bn ($120.0m) and an ordinary loss of JPY 17.10bn ($153.4m).

Operating revenue fell YoY by 26.2 percent to JPY 212.20bn ($1.9bn).

K Line explained that it was steadily implementing measures to improve profitability, including reducing costs and improving vessel allocation efficiency, but higher bunker prices were cited as being a key reason for the decline in performance.

"Because of such factors as a rise in fuel oil prices and an increase in one-time expenses which arose during the period of the transfer of operations for the integration of the containership business, financial results deteriorated, with revenue declining year on year," K Line said.


Container ship at harbour. Skuld warns of unusual chemical compounds in Southeast Asian marine fuels  

Marine insurer reports fuels meeting ISO 8217 standards but containing high levels of hydrocarbon compounds.

Arsenio Dominguez, IMO. IMO chief urges progress on net-zero framework amid Hormuz crisis  

Arsenio Dominguez calls for constructive dialogue as MEPC 84 tackles greenhouse gas measures and ballast water regulations.

Monjasa Shaker vessel. Monjasa reflags UAE-based tankers to Emirates registry  

Marine fuels supplier transitions first of three vessels from Liberian to UAE flag.

Ammonia bunkering at Port of Ulsan. Lotte Fine Chemical completes world’s first commercial ammonia bunkering at Ulsan  

South Korean chemical company claims to have established a complete green ammonia value chain.

London skyline. Propeller Fuels seeks bunker trader for London office  

Marine fuel supplier advertises for trader to manage procurement, sales and client relationships.

Windward Hamburg vessel. Fincantieri’s VARD launches first of four offshore wind vessels for Windward Offshore  

VARD 4 19 design vessel features battery hybrid propulsion and green methanol preparation.

Singapore Maritime Week panel session. Singapore industry leaders call for regulatory clarity on maritime energy transition  

SSA councillors highlight need for government support and clear policies to enable alternative fuel adoption.

Aerial view of container vessel at sea. Seaspan and Technolog unveil LNG feeder design with four-week ammonia conversion pathway  

Lloyd’s Register grants approval for a 3,370 TEU vessel concept designed for swift transition to zero-carbon fuel.

David Foo, MPA. Singapore’s MPA backs LNG as part of multi-fuel strategy for shipping decarbonisation  

Authority emphasises regulatory frameworks and workforce development as sector navigates geopolitical uncertainty and energy transition.

ABS and PIL sign MoU. ABS and PIL partner on book-and-claim emissions verification  

Classification society to verify fuel consumption and emissions data for shipping line’s alternative fuel claims.


↑  Back to Top