This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 31 Jul 2018, 13:17 GMT

K Line cites higher bunker costs as key reason for $173m loss


Average bunker price paid jumped 27 percent in Q1.


K Line's car carrier vessel, the Hawaiian Highway.
Image credit: K Line
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) reports that the average bunker price it paid during the firm's first fiscal quarter (Q1), which runs between April and June, rose year-on-year (YoY) by $88, or 27.0 percent, to $414 per metric tonne.

In a sequential comparison with the previous quarter's (January to March) average of $391 per tonne, the result is $23, or 5.9 percent, higher.

K Line has now revised its forecast bunker price for Q2 upwards to $468 per tonne, which if reached would represent a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) increase of $54, or 13.0 percent, and a YoY rise of $146, or 45.3 percent.

For H1, K Line has upped its $376 April prediction to $441 per tonne; the H2 forecast is now $91 higher than three months ago at $460 per tonne; whilst the full-year average estimate has been adjusted to $451 per tonne - $78 more than the last forecast.

According to K Line, each $10 change in the average bunker price will either add or subtract JPY 80 million ($0.7m) to the company's ordinary income.

In its key results for the quarter, K Line posted a loss attributable to owners of JPY 19.27 billion ($172.9m), compared to JPY 8.52bn last year. There was also an operating loss of JPY 13.37bn ($120.0m) and an ordinary loss of JPY 17.10bn ($153.4m).

Operating revenue fell YoY by 26.2 percent to JPY 212.20bn ($1.9bn).

K Line explained that it was steadily implementing measures to improve profitability, including reducing costs and improving vessel allocation efficiency, but higher bunker prices were cited as being a key reason for the decline in performance.

"Because of such factors as a rise in fuel oil prices and an increase in one-time expenses which arose during the period of the transfer of operations for the integration of the containership business, financial results deteriorated, with revenue declining year on year," K Line said.


Singapore waterfront skyline. Oilmar DMCC seeks bunker traders for Singapore office  

Marine fuel trading firm is recruiting mid-level and senior professionals to expand Asia-Pacific marine fuels operations.

Dubai skyline. Oilmar DMCC seeks senior bunker trader for Dubai operations  

Dubai-based energy firm recruits experienced marine fuels trader to expand Middle East portfolio.

Zhoushan Changhong International Shipyard logo. Zhoushan Changhong secures orders through 2029 with LNG dual-fuel container ships  

Chinese shipyard reports full order book as it constructs 19,000-teu vessels for MSC Group.

Century Highway Green vessel. K Line secures long-term bio-LNG supply for car carrier fleet  

Japanese shipping company expects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 60,800 tonnes annually.

One Simplicity vessel. Methanol- and ammonia-ready container ship delivered to ONE  

Approval in Principle obtained from Lloyd’s Register for future methanol and ammonia fuel conversion.

Methanol bunker fuel delivery. World Fuel Services and West Coast Clean Fuels launch methanol bunkering across US ports  

First over-the-water methanol delivery completed in South Florida with Coast Guard-approved procedures.

Valerie Ahrens. Burando Energies appoints Valerie Ahrens as global head of methanol  

Ahrens brings more than 30 years of energy sector experience to the marine fuels supplier.

New Sea Generation (NSG) logo. New Sea Generation seeks junior bunker trader in Greece  

Greek bunker firm advertises role requiring commitment to demanding work schedule and operational responsibilities.

Person signing a document. IINO Lines secures sustainable shipping finance for methanol dual-fuel VLCC  

Japanese shipowner signs impact financing agreement with Mizuho Bank for alternative-fuel tanker.

Fluxys logo. Fluxys Belgium reports EUR74.9m profit as LNG flows surge and hydrogen infrastructure begins  

Belgian gas infrastructure operator’s 2025 net profit fell 8.8% amid hydrogen and CO₂ investments.


↑  Back to Top