This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 31 Jul 2018, 13:17 GMT

K Line cites higher bunker costs as key reason for $173m loss


Average bunker price paid jumped 27 percent in Q1.


K Line's car carrier vessel, the Hawaiian Highway.
Image credit: K Line
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) reports that the average bunker price it paid during the firm's first fiscal quarter (Q1), which runs between April and June, rose year-on-year (YoY) by $88, or 27.0 percent, to $414 per metric tonne.

In a sequential comparison with the previous quarter's (January to March) average of $391 per tonne, the result is $23, or 5.9 percent, higher.

K Line has now revised its forecast bunker price for Q2 upwards to $468 per tonne, which if reached would represent a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) increase of $54, or 13.0 percent, and a YoY rise of $146, or 45.3 percent.

For H1, K Line has upped its $376 April prediction to $441 per tonne; the H2 forecast is now $91 higher than three months ago at $460 per tonne; whilst the full-year average estimate has been adjusted to $451 per tonne - $78 more than the last forecast.

According to K Line, each $10 change in the average bunker price will either add or subtract JPY 80 million ($0.7m) to the company's ordinary income.

In its key results for the quarter, K Line posted a loss attributable to owners of JPY 19.27 billion ($172.9m), compared to JPY 8.52bn last year. There was also an operating loss of JPY 13.37bn ($120.0m) and an ordinary loss of JPY 17.10bn ($153.4m).

Operating revenue fell YoY by 26.2 percent to JPY 212.20bn ($1.9bn).

K Line explained that it was steadily implementing measures to improve profitability, including reducing costs and improving vessel allocation efficiency, but higher bunker prices were cited as being a key reason for the decline in performance.

"Because of such factors as a rise in fuel oil prices and an increase in one-time expenses which arose during the period of the transfer of operations for the integration of the containership business, financial results deteriorated, with revenue declining year on year," K Line said.


Mount Asahi vessel. CSSC delivers LNG dual-fuel bulker to Eastern Pacific nearly four months early  

210,000-tonne Mount Asahi handed over ahead of contract schedule.

Mount Vision vessel. New Times Shipbuilding delivers three LNG dual-fuel tankers in four days  

Chinese yard hands over one VLCC and two Aframax-size crude tankers within a single week.

Mercedes Pinto vessel TTS LNG bunkering. Baleària ferry completes LNG bunkering at regular berth in Las Palmas for first time  

LNG refuelling of Mercedes Pinto set to take place weekly without changing berth.

Baltic Timber vessel. Baltic Shipping Company takes delivery of wind-assisted hybrid coaster  

3,550-dwt vessel is fitted with Econowind VentoFoils and a battery package.

Pakistan flag. Vitol Bunkers launches first commercial bunkering service at Gwadar Port  

Company begins offering HSFO, VLSFO and LSMGO at the Pakistani deepwater port.

Port of Singapore. Trailing 3-month bunker sales fall to lowest since April 2025 in Singapore  

Bunker volume of 13.569m tonnes sold between April and June was worst result in 14 months.

Glander International Bunkering logo. Glander International Bunkering reports $23.4m pre-tax earnings amid volatile shipping markets  

Bunker trading company says new fuels volumes doubled over the past year, driven by client demand.

Aerial view of tanker vessel at sea. ISO-compliant fuels increasingly causing operational problems, Lloyd’s Register warns  

Latest FOBAS report finds fuel quality risk shifting beyond off-specification fuels.

Bioethanol bunkering at the Port of Santos. Bunker One completes Latin America’s first bioethanol bunkering of a deep-sea container vessel  

500,000-litre delivery at Santos marks a first for bioethanol as a marine fuel.

Maritime Technologies Forum (MTF) logo. MTF issues safety management guidelines for methanol-fuelled ships  

New MTF report offers recommendations for developing and strengthening safety management systems for methanol as a fuel.


↑  Back to Top