This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Tue 31 Jul 2018, 13:17 GMT

K Line cites higher bunker costs as key reason for $173m loss


Average bunker price paid jumped 27 percent in Q1.


K Line's car carrier vessel, the Hawaiian Highway.
Image credit: K Line
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd (K Line) reports that the average bunker price it paid during the firm's first fiscal quarter (Q1), which runs between April and June, rose year-on-year (YoY) by $88, or 27.0 percent, to $414 per metric tonne.

In a sequential comparison with the previous quarter's (January to March) average of $391 per tonne, the result is $23, or 5.9 percent, higher.

K Line has now revised its forecast bunker price for Q2 upwards to $468 per tonne, which if reached would represent a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) increase of $54, or 13.0 percent, and a YoY rise of $146, or 45.3 percent.

For H1, K Line has upped its $376 April prediction to $441 per tonne; the H2 forecast is now $91 higher than three months ago at $460 per tonne; whilst the full-year average estimate has been adjusted to $451 per tonne - $78 more than the last forecast.

According to K Line, each $10 change in the average bunker price will either add or subtract JPY 80 million ($0.7m) to the company's ordinary income.

In its key results for the quarter, K Line posted a loss attributable to owners of JPY 19.27 billion ($172.9m), compared to JPY 8.52bn last year. There was also an operating loss of JPY 13.37bn ($120.0m) and an ordinary loss of JPY 17.10bn ($153.4m).

Operating revenue fell YoY by 26.2 percent to JPY 212.20bn ($1.9bn).

K Line explained that it was steadily implementing measures to improve profitability, including reducing costs and improving vessel allocation efficiency, but higher bunker prices were cited as being a key reason for the decline in performance.

"Because of such factors as a rise in fuel oil prices and an increase in one-time expenses which arose during the period of the transfer of operations for the integration of the containership business, financial results deteriorated, with revenue declining year on year," K Line said.


Keel-laying ceremony of a vessel with builder's hull no. 8392. Exmar lays keel for ammonia-powered midsize gas carrier  

Belgian shipping company marks construction milestone for dual-fuel vessel at Hyundai Heavy Industries yard.

Vessel with two Wind Challenger units installed. MOL installs dual Wind Challenger hard sails on LNG carrier under construction  

Japanese shipping company fits telescoping hard sails at Hanwha Ocean's Geoje yard for 2026 delivery.

IBIA members meeting graphic. IBIA to host members meeting on mass flow meter survey findings  

Session on 14 May will examine global MFM implementation and fuel quality transparency.

Edmond Ow, GCMD. GCMD outlines phased approach to ammonia bunkering safety and operations  

Organisation details three-phase programme spanning 2023–2026 to address safety gaps in ammonia bunkering.

Johnson Matthey logo. Johnson Matthey to supply methanol technology for Liquid Sunshine biomethanol plant in China  

First phase aims for 75,000 tonnes annual capacity, with potential e-methanol expansion planned.

Classification certificate for methanol fuel bunkering vessels. CCS issues methanol and scrubber certifications at Singapore Maritime Week  

State-owned enterprise presents methanol classification certificate and approves open-loop exhaust gas cleaning system.

Houston skyline. Dan-Bunkering seeks senior fuel supplier for Houston office  

Marine fuel supplier is recruiting for a strategic role managing key accounts across the Americas oil and gas sector.

Monjasa logo. Monjasa reports $39m profit as marine fuel volumes hold steady at 6.8m tonnes  

Danish bunker supplier maintains volumes despite muted demand, with equity reaching $472m in 2025.

Seto Azure ship-to-ship (STS) LNG bunkering operation. Osaka Gas launches ship-to-ship LNG bunkering in Japan  

Japanese energy company now offers all three primary LNG fuel supply methods for vessels.

Gasum logo. Gasum converts to a public limited company to diversify financing options  

Finnish energy company changes legal structure from private to public limited liability company.


↑  Back to Top