Wed 14 Feb 2018 15:08

Maersk Line recorded two incidents of sulphur non-compliance in 2017


Shipper stresses that it makes more than 50,000 port calls a year and did not financially benefit from the incidents.



Maersk Line recorded two incidents of sulphur non-compliance in 2017, A.P. Moller - Maersk (Maersk) has confirmed.

In the group's '2017 Sustainability Report', released on Friday, Maersk notes that the incidents took place in Emission Control Areas (ECAs) where a 0.1 percent cap on the sulphur content of fuel is already being enforced.

The first non-compliance was determined on a Maersk Line vessel calling at Long Beach, California, in March 2017, with the sulphur content at nearly 0.2 percent in an area where the sulphur limit is 0.1 percent.

According to Maersk, an internal investigation confirmed that the vessel carried compliant fuel, and that the contamination was due to human error in the switchover procedure.

In July 2017, a Maersk Line vessel in the port of Antwerp, Belgium, was deemed to be in breach of the area's fuel sulphur limit of 0.1 percent.

Maersk says an internal investigation found that the vessel's low-sulphur fuel tank had been contaminated due to human error in operating two butterfly valves between the ship's high-sulphur and low-sulphur fuel tanks.

The contamination is said to have raised the sulphur level in the low-sulphur fuel tank to around 0.2 percent.

"We carried out a complete cleaning of the low-sulphur tanks and the onboard systems. [We] have implemented specific procedures to avoid this kind of contamination on all relevant vessels," Maersk explained.

According to the report, Maersk Line makes more than 50,000 port calls on an annual basis, which means approximately 0.004 percent (or less) of the calls resulted in non-compliance being determined.

Maersk also stressed that it had gained "no financial benefits from the two incidents".

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top