Wed 17 Sep 2008, 15:24 GMT

WTSA selects Bunker Index


Bunker Index price data used for new surcharge formula calculations.



After a comprehensive internal review that included feedback from customers, The Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (WTSA) has revisited, and made changes in how it calculates guideline bunker fuel surcharges in the U.S.-Asia freight market.

In a statement, WTSA said "Member shipping lines have adopted a simpler, more transparent formula for dry cargo which eliminates a number of variables that made the formula more complex; distinguishes between bunker fuel-related costs for West Coast port-to-port and East Coast all-water services; and narrows the formula tiers – the threshold fuel prices that trigger surcharge increases and the amount of those increases – to ease the impacts of monthly adjustments".

WTSA member shipping lines intend to implement the new formula effective October 1, 2008 in their tariffs and in service contracts going forward, for dry cargo moving from all U.S. origin locations to all Asian destinations. A separate guideline covering refrigerated cargo is expected to be finalized and announced shortly, to take effect on November 1, 2008.

“The new formula is a significant departure from how WTSA has calculated its bunker surcharge guideline in the past,” said WTSA executive administrator Brian M. Conrad.

“Container lines face an urgent need to recover fuel costs that have more than doubled in 18 months. In turn, customers are being asked to absorb a sizeable increase in their freight costs, and carriers recognize that this will require an easily justifiable, transparent process.”

WTSA says it began the process of modifying its surcharge formula by eliminating unwieldy steps that were part of an effort to arrive at a complete “average of averages” that reflects the cost impacts of rising fuel prices on multiple, different container services. Specifically, the new bunker surcharge formula which now:

*Tracks a single grade of fuel, IFO 380, which accounts for a large percentage of fuel-related costs.

* Eliminates the weighted average of weekly prices at 11 load ports.

* Uses a straight average of Hong Kong and Los Angeles prices for the West Coast; and Hong Kong and New York prices for the East Coast surcharge.

* Uses price data for the three ports published on Bunker Index.

A second set of changes involves straightforward components for constructing fuel cost impacts from changes in fuel prices. These include:

* Vessel effective capacity.
* Westbound allocation of deadweight capacity after eastbound empty repositions.
* Maximum capacity for loaded containers before reaching a ship’s weight limit.
* Daily fuel consumption.
* One-way steaming time (excluding time in port).
WTSA says averages for the above components vary for West Coast and East Coast services, but are constant for each.

A simple calculation adjusts effective capacity to allow for the deadweight impact of empty returns; multiplies the fuel price (per ton) by consumption (tons per day), then by transit time (steaming days); and finally dividing by the maximum number of loaded containers by weight for the ship’s effective capacity, to produce an average fuel cost per sailing per 40-foot container (FEU).

Under the new formula, WTSA says the weighted average fuel price of $689.60 per metric ton developed under the current formula for the month of August 2008, translates into a bunker fuel surcharge of $767 per 40-foot container (FEU) from the West Coast, and $1,515 per FEU from the East Coast. Going forward WTSA says the monthly-adjusted totals will be fine-tuned further, developing distinct weekly average price information for each coast.

With separate calculations for West Coast and East Coast services – an approach said to be favoured by many shippers in discussions with WTSA – Conrad said it is inevitable that many customers will see differences in their surcharges under the new formula versus the old one.

“The carriers’ focus was to make the formula as simple and transparent as possible, and to reflect as accurately as possible the fuel costs passed through depending on routing,” he explained. “We believe that, under the new formula, those objectives have been met.”

WTSA is in the process of preparing a fact sheet that it will post on its web site shortly, detailing the new bunker surcharge formula, with a matrix that translates current average fuel prices to per container surcharge levels.

WTSA is a voluntary discussion and research forum of 10 major ocean and intermodal container shipping lines serving the trade from ports and inland points in the U.S. to destinations throughout Asia.

WTSA members include: APL, Ltd., COSCO Container Lines, Ltd., Evergreen Line, Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., Hapag Lloyd AG, Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (K Line), Nippon Yusen Kaisha (N.Y.K. Line), Orient Overseas Container Line Inc(OOCL) and Yangming Marine Transport Corp.


Areion vessel. Dorian LPG takes delivery of dual-fuel VLGC capable of carrying ammonia  

The 93,000-cbm Areion can run on LPG or fuel oil and transport ammonia cargoes.

FSRU Toscana alongside Green Zeebrugge vessel. RINA awards ISCC EU certification to OLT Offshore LNG Toscana for bio-LNG supply  

Certification enables bio-LNG use in the EU as a renewable fuel under RED II and RED III directives.

World Shipping Council at IMO meeting. WSC calls for safe maritime corridor as 20,000 seafarers remain trapped in the Persian Gulf  

Industry body urges IMO member states to establish safe passage and supply access.

Graphic promoting Auramarine webinar titled 'Sustainable Fueling Part 3: Ammonia - next alternative fuel in marine'. Auramarine to host webinar on ammonia as marine fuel in April  

Finnish firm will explore ammonia’s role in maritime decarbonisation at its third spring webinar.

Front cover of study by WinGD and Envision Energy titled 'Renewable Fuel Economics: An OPEX illustration based on current costs'. Green ammonia could reach cost parity with VLSFO and LNG by 2050, study finds  

WinGD and Envision Energy study projects green ammonia operational costs competitive with conventional marine fuels.

Elenger Marine's LNG bunkering vessel Optimus alongside Brittany Ferries’ Saint-Malo. Bureau Veritas verifies methane emissions on Brittany Ferries’ LNG vessels  

Verification enables ferry operator to report measured methane slip instead of regulatory default values.

Map showing existing and planned Emission Control Areas (ECAs). Alliance calls for urgent black carbon action as new Arctic emission control areas take effect  

Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea ECAs now in force, with compliance deadline set for March 2027.

Artistic impression of battery-electric ferry for operation on Perth’s Swan River. Lloyd’s Register to class Western Australia’s first electric ferry fleet  

Echo Marine Group partners with Lloyd’s Register on five battery-electric ferries for Perth’s Swan River.

Thomas Kazakos, secretary general of The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS). ICS condemns Middle East shipping attacks as 20,000 seafarers remain trapped  

Industry body calls for urgent state action to resupply vessels and enable crew changes.

Molslinjen ferry illustration. Molslinjen order propels Australia to top of battery vessel production rankings  

Danish ferry operator’s three-catamaran order at Incat Tasmania shifts global manufacturing landscape, analysis shows.