This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd suspend Strait of Hormuz transits amid Middle East security crisis  

Container carriers reroute services around the Cape of Good Hope as military conflict escalates.

Map of Middle East. Operations continue as normal at most Middle East ports  

Most facilities operating normally, with exceptions in Oman and Saudi Arabia.

Photograph of the 93,000-cbm very large ammonia carrier (VLAC) Gaz Ronin. Naftomar takes delivery of 93,000-cbm dual-fuel ammonia carrier  

Gaz Ronin features a MAN dual-fuel engine with high-pressure selective catalytic reduction technology.

Aurora Botnia leaving harbor. AYK Energy completes world’s largest marine battery retrofit on Wasaline ferry  

Aurora Botnia receives 10.4 MWh battery system, bringing total capacity to 12.6 MWh.

Steel cutting ceremony for an LNG dual-fuel 307,000-tonne crude oil tanker with builder's hull no. 113. Dalian Shipbuilding begins construction on LNG dual-fuel crude tanker  

Development is one of a number of milestones reported by parent company over the past few days.

Photograph of Sallaum Lines' Ocean Breeze vessel with 'Introducing The Blue Corridor' overlaid text. Sallaum Lines launches Blue Corridor sustainability initiative for Europe–Africa ro-ro trade  

Company deploys LNG-capable vessels with AI routing and eco-speed protocols on new green shipping corridor.

The platform supply vessel Viking Energy. Eidesvik Offshore signs yard contract for ammonia retrofit of PSV Viking Energy  

Halsnøy Dokk to convert platform supply vessel as part of EU-backed Apollo project.

Vanquish tanker alongside Jette Theresa oil/chemical tanker docked at terminal. North Sea Port completes risk analysis for alternative fuel bunkering operations  

Port authority says LNG, hydrogen, methanol and ammonia can be safely refuelled across its facilities.

Container ship near a port. Ammonia emerges as most feasible alternative fuel for deep-sea shipping in 2050 emissions study  

Research combining expert survey and technical analysis ranks ammonia ahead of hydrogen and methanol.

Cargo vessel at sea. EMSA study examines biodiesel blend spill response as shipping adopts alternative fuels  

Research addresses knowledge gaps on biodiesel-conventional fuel blends as marine pollutants and response measures.


↑  Back to Top