This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


Graphic with photographs of IBIA's four elected board members for 2026. IBIA elects four board members for three-year terms  

Beumer, Campanella, Chung and Draffin join the board from 1 April 2026.

Iceberg floating in Arctic waters. IMO members urged to back mandatory Arctic fuel standards to cut black carbon emissions  

Clean Arctic Alliance calls for polar fuel measure requiring cleaner fuels in Arctic waters.

AET’s hybrid electric vessel render. AET adds hybrid-electric shuttle tanker to fleet with dual-fuel capability  

Tanker operator brings first hybrid-electric DPST into service on long-term charter with lower-emissions technology.

Methanol ship-to-ship bunkering operation at anchorage in Yokohama. Japan completes first ship-to-ship methanol bunkering at anchorage in Yokohama  

Five-way partnership delivers methanol fuel transfer between vessels at Keihin Port using domestically produced biomethanol.

Anna Cosulich vessel. Cosulich launches first methanol-ready bunker tanker in China  

Anna Cosulich is first of four sister vessels in fleet expansion programme.

Keel-laying ceremony of Natalia Cosulich. Cosulich begins construction of fourth methanol-ready bunker tanker in China  

Steel cutting for Natalia Cosulich marks completion of the group’s new alternative fuel-capable vessel series.

AiP award ceremony for cubic tank concept. Lloyd’s Register grants approval in principle to GTT’s CUBIQ LNG fuel tank design  

Classification society approves CUBIQ system designed to expand membrane-type LNG fuel tanks into commercial shipping.

International Chamber of Shipping nuclear webinar. ICS to host webinar on regulatory framework for nuclear merchant ships  

International Chamber of Shipping event on 26 February will examine regulatory pathways for nuclear vessels.

Cosco Shipping Libra vessel. World’s first full methanol dual-fuel retrofit completes maiden voyage  

Cosco Shipping Libra covered 27,800 nautical miles on a 106-day voyage after main and auxiliary engine conversion.

PetroChina Petroineos Trading logo. PetroChina International seeks bunker trader for Rotterdam as it expands ARA marine fuel operations  

Chinese energy trader aims to boost alternative fuels portfolio and market share in Europe.


↑  Back to Top