This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


Navergy Infrastructure Partners logo. Pilot LNG rebrands to Navergy Infrastructure Partners as it expands beyond marine fuels  

Houston-based company changes name to reflect broader energy infrastructure ambitions and global expansion plans.

EcoVadis Platinum sustainability rating logo. Bergen Bunkers achieves EcoVadis Platinum sustainability rating  

Norwegian bunker trader adds top-tier sustainability certification to existing ISO and ISCC PLUS credentials.

Lucent Pathfinder vessel. NYK takes delivery of dual-fuel LPG carrier with ammonia capability  

Lucent Pathfinder is the seventh LPG-fuelled VLGC ordered by the Japanese shipping company.

Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore logo. Singapore opens applications for additional LNG bunkering licences  

Maritime and Port Authority sets 27 March deadline for operators seeking new supply permits.

A cargo port in Singapore. Singapore reports record marine fuel sales and container throughput in 2025  

Port of Singapore handled 56.77 million tonnes of marine fuel, up 3.4% year-on-year.

Grande Manila naming ceremony. Grimaldi takes delivery of seventh ammonia-ready car carrier Grande Manila  

The 9,241-ceu vessel was delivered in Shanghai and begins Asia–Europe service this week.

Barcelona Maersk naming ceremony. Maersk takes delivery of final 17,480-teu dual-fuel containership  

Barcelona Maersk completes six-vessel class built with HD Hyundai Heavy Industries in South Korea.

Container terminal with stacked containers. Ports face 2030 deadline for shore power as only 20% of EU connections installed  

TT Club warns European ports lag behind on onshore power supply infrastructure ahead of mandatory 2030 regulations.

Viking Cinderella vessel. Viking Line reports cargo record and tenfold biogas increase in 2025  

Baltic Sea ferry operator transported 139,484 cargo units while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 60,000 tonnes.

Hartman Seatrade vessel render. Hartman Seatrade orders Wärtsilä 31 engine for new heavy lift vessel  

Dutch operator selects fuel-efficient engine and propulsion package for 3,800-dwt newbuild at Rock Shipbuilding.


↑  Back to Top