This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


Lapis Ace ship-to-ship LNG bunkering operation. MOL signs first annual LNG bunkering contract for car carriers in Vancouver  

Japanese shipping company secures year-round fuel supply with Seaspan Energy at Canadian port.

Gasum's LNG bunkering vessel Coralius. Gasum’s maritime bio-LNG sales surge from 0.8% to 12.3% in 2025  

Nordic energy company attributes growth to FuelEU Maritime regulation introduced in 2025.

Port Authority of Valencia board meeting. Valenciaport gives LNG bunkering go-ahead to Shell and Axpo Iberia  

Port authority approves two LNG bunkering authorisations as part of its decarbonisation strategy.

Northern Purpose naming ceremony. BSM enters LCO₂ carrier segment with management of dual-fuel Northern Purpose  

Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement takes over first liquefied carbon dioxide carrier for Northern Lights project.

Anna Cosulich vessel. Fratelli Cosulich takes delivery of methanol-ready bunker tanker Anna Cosulich  

Vessel built in China will head to Singapore to support group's bunkering operations.

Nave Equator vessel. Navios Partners takes delivery of dual-fuel-ready Aframax tanker  

Nave Equator is equipped with LNG- and methanol-ready capability plus shore power connectivity.

EmissionLink logo. EmissionLink completes FuelEU pooling submissions for over 600 vessels  

Emissions management service says 90% of shipowners opted to pool in the first compliance cycle.

Dong Fang Qing Gang vessel. China's first inland hydrogen fuel cell container ship enters commercial service  

Dong Fang Qing Gang operates in Jiaxing with 64-teu capacity and zero emissions.

Damen ASD Tug 2713 Fuel Flexible (FF) vessel graphic. Damen receives methanol approval for ASD Tug 2713 fuel-flexible design  

Bureau Veritas and Dutch flag state grant approval, enabling construction of methanol-ready tugs.

Sing Fuels hiring graphic. Sing Fuels seeks supply trader for China-focused marine fuel procurement role  

Singapore-based firm recruiting for position involving supplier negotiations and market tracking across Asia.


↑  Back to Top