This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


ESVAGT Robert Boyle vessel at the Port of Immingham. UK's first commercial biomethanol bunkering service launches at Immingham  

Exolum, Methanex and Ørsted partner to supply biomethanol for shipping at the UK's largest port by tonnage.

Vitol Bunkers vessel alongside terminal facility. Vitol Bunkers launches HSFO supply in Pakistan after four-year hiatus  

Company resumes high-sulphur fuel oil bunkering at three Pakistani ports following earlier VLSFO and LSMGO launches.

Aerial view of CIMC SOE shipyard facility. CIMC SOE secures orders for three LNG bunkering vessels  

Chinese shipbuilder adds two 20,000 cbm and one 18,900 cbm LNG bunkering vessels to order book.

HADAG Type 2030e ferry render. Lehmann Marine to supply battery systems for Hamburg’s first electric ferries  

German firm wins contract for three 3.8 MWh systems for HADAG vessels entering service in 2028.

Viking Glory vessel. Viking Line green corridor project marks two years with biogas use and shore power progress  

Turku-Stockholm route partnership reports tenfold increase in renewable biogas use and advancing electrification infrastructure.

MV Blue Alliance vessel. Global Fuel Supply unveils Blue Alliance tanker after Dubai upgrade works  

Marine fuel supplier completes intermediate survey and technical upgrades on vessel ahead of operational service.

Everllence common-rail technology illustration. Everllence common-rail technology surpasses 20 million operating hours  

Engine maker’s common-rail systems reach milestone across 600 engines and 5,500 cylinders over 18 years.

Representatives from LR Advisory and Geogas. LR Advisory appointed by Geogas Trading to develop FuelEU Maritime compliance strategy  

Lloyd’s Register division to support charterer with emissions planning and FuelEU pooling operationalisation.

Photograph of a red container vessel. ICS survey shows maritime leaders favour LNG as industry awaits IMO net-zero vote  

Barometer reveals strategic shift towards conservative fuel choices amid regulatory uncertainty over decarbonisation framework.

Petrobras logo. Petrobras bunker operations to close for Carnival, with higher prices during holiday period  

Brazilian headquarters shut 16-18 February; Rotterdam office to handle new sales during closure.


↑  Back to Top