This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


Osprey Energy logo. Osprey Energy seeks junior bunker trader to support Cebu trading activities from Netherlands  

Dutch marine fuel supplier targets Cebu region expansion through new training programme for Filipino candidates.

EUA prices dropping graphic. KPI OceanConnect highlights falling EUA prices as opportunity for shipowners to lock in compliance costs  

Marine fuel supplier says timing carbon allowance purchases can reduce costs as EU emissions scope expands.

RINA employee in control room. RINA partners with Hanwha Group on battery-hybrid propulsion for ro-ro ferries  

Classification society to provide regulatory compliance verification for hybrid battery systems on newbuilds and retrofits.

Amadeus Titanium vessel. HGK Shipping’s Amadeus Titanium fitted with wind assistance system  

Coastal vessel equipped with VentoFoils at Dutch port to reduce fuel consumption on Covestro routes.

Sebastian Weder, Bunker One. Bunker One expands physical supply operations to Tallinn and Finland  

Marine fuel supplier extends Baltic Sea coverage with new operational presence in Estonia and Finland.

LNG shore-to-ship bunkering operation. Sawgrass LNG & Power completes first shore-to-ship LNG bunkering at Port Everglades  

Operation fuelled Ritz-Carlton Yacht Collection vessel Ilma on March 26, marking expansion of marine LNG infrastructure.

Avenir Ascension alongside Peter Pan vessel. Avenir LNG completes first ship-to-ship LNG bunkering of ferry in Klaipeda  

Operation marks Lithuania’s first STS LNG bunkering of a ferry, expanding Avenir’s Baltic operations.

Aura Marine webinar on ammonia as marine fuel. Auramarine to host webinar on ammonia fuel supply systems and safety considerations  

Finnish marine equipment provider schedules 16 April session on ammonia as an alternative fuel for shipping.

Green maritime fuel training programme. Hong Kong launches world’s first government-led green maritime fuel trainer programme  

Three-day course aims to certify trainers in alternative fuels, including ammonia, methanol and hydrogen.

VPS logo. The emergence of B100 FAME in a volatile distillate market | Paul Hoather, VPS  

VPS UK Sales Manager provides recommendations following increased B100 usage due to price dynamics.


↑  Back to Top