This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


HMM and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries (HD HHI) contract signing. HMM orders eight LNG dual-fuel container ships in newbuild push  

South Korean carrier commissions 13,000-TEU vessels from HD Hyundai, with deliveries due to begin in 2029.

Keel-laying ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. S1125. CIMC SOE advances construction on three LNG bunker vessels  

Chinese shipbuilder progresses three bunker vessel projects in the same week.

Verde Marine Energy (VME) logo. Verde Marine Energy adds two staff as it expands bunkering operations in ARA region  

Dutch bunker supplier hires former Melroh Trading employees and launches RMG 380 3.5% HSFO barge service following Sunoco Marine tie-up.

Fund for Energy Efficiency Technologies (FEET) signing ceremony. Fund for Energy Efficiency Technologies finances first wind-assisted propulsion projects with Eastern Pacific Shipping  

GCMD and AIM Horizon Investments link verified fuel savings to financing for two EPS vessels fitted with wind-assisted propulsion.

Launching ceremony of Yacht Prime and Yacht Star. Pinnacle Marine launches two B100-compatible utility boats for Excelessel Offshore  

Singapore shipbuilder nears completion of six-vessel B100 series.

Maersk Torino vessel. BSM takes over methanol-fuelled Maersk Torino, building alternative fuel experience  

Ship manager adds methanol-fuelled container vessel to its fleet, citing growing expertise in alternative fuel operations.

Albert Park vessel. Bureau Veritas marks naming of Union Maritime's wind-assisted Aframax tanker  

Albert Park, fitted with three WindWings sails, is Chinese yard's first wind-assisted Aframax product tanker.

Maersk Halifax ship-to-ship (STS) ethanol bunkering operation. Singapore completes world's largest ethanol bunkering operation  

Maersk, Golden Island and PSA perform ethanol bunkering in Singapore, drawing on methanol handling experience and safety protocols.

WinGD Global Service personnel. WinGD signs five-year service deal for NYK LNG carrier fleet  

Swiss engine designer WinGD will support ten dual-fuel engines across five Japanese-operated LNG carriers.

Steel-cutting ceremony for vessel with builder's hull no. N1036. Steel cut for third methanol-ready chemical tanker in ROC-Essberger series  

Chemical tanker series is designed with provisions for methanol fuel and wind-assisted propulsion systems.


↑  Back to Top