This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


RSP and RST logo. Agreement signed to bring shore power to Rotterdam shortsea terminal by 2030  

Shore power partnership at Rotterdam’s RST terminal targets AFIR compliance and reduced ship emissions at berth by end of decade.

Equatorial logo. Equatorial Marine Fuel receives dual sustainability recognitions in 2026  

Singapore-based bunker firm earns the LowCarbonSG logo and an EcoVadis Bronze Medal.

Red Sea topographic map. Red Sea diversions and Mediterranean emissions rules set to squeeze bunker supply, warns Peninsula  

Bunker supplier Peninsula warns rerouted tankers face soaring fuel costs and regulatory penalties.

Hydrogen maritime workshop. Hydrogen maritime workshop held to push early regulatory alignment  

Classification society and French maritime authority explore pathways for hydrogen deployment at sea.

Launching ceremony of MSC Licia X vessel. Changhong International undocks seventh LNG dual-fuel container ship for MSC  

Vessel is part of a series fitted with ammonia-ready and methanol-ready provisions.

IBIA logo. IBIA urges further investigation into marine fuel concerns linked to shale oil components  

Industry body says evidence does not establish a direct link between shale oil and reported operational issues.

KUSPC grand opening. ABS grants AiP for LNG bunkering barge design  

Samsung Heavy Industries and Conrad Shipyard receive AiP for basic design under joint development.

Waalvliet vessel. ABB and Econowind combine wind propulsion with digital routing to cut ship emissions  

The partnership integrates wind-assisted propulsion with weather routing to reduce fuel consumption.

Peninsula logo. Peninsula seeks junior cargo trader for Dubai role  

Position centres on the procurement of marine fuels, blending components and associated products.

Island Oil Summer Students Programme. Island Oil opens operations to students in summer internship programme  

Cyprus-based firm gives students hands-on experience across its bunker business.


↑  Back to Top