This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


Ammonia Energy Association (AEA) logo. AEA qualifies global roster of auditors for ammonia certification system  

Bureau Veritas, DNV, TÜV SÜD and three others cleared to verify low-emission ammonia credentials.

New York city skyline. IBIA early-bird registration deadline approaches for New York convention  

Discounted rates available for members and non-members up until the end of August.

MARAD and Core Power MOC signing. MARAD and Core Power sign cooperation framework to advance nuclear-powered merchant ships  

Agreement targets first construction from 2028 as China accelerates its own nuclear shipping ambitions.

DNV and GEA logos. GEA and DNV launch three-year ethanol data intelligence partnership  

Collaboration will integrate structured global ethanol production data into DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight platform.

VPS logo. Perfect storm at sea: High bunker prices meet declining fuel quality | Steve Bee, VPS  

VPS highlights sharp drop in fuel quality during 2026 amid higher prices.

Koper waterfront. SUPERALFUEL to hold first alternative marine fuels training course in Koper  

The Adriatic-Ionian initiative targets hydrogen, ammonia and methanol adoption in ports and shipping.

Steel-cutting ceremony of vessels with builder's hull nos. S1159 and S1160. CIMC SOE cuts steel on third and fourth 20,000-cbm LNG bunker vessels for GSX Energy  

Chinese shipbuilder advances series build as two hulls enter construction simultaneously.

Pennsylvania skyline. Sunoco seeks bunker trader in US to drive marine fuels growth  

New hire will be tasked with expanding Sunoco's bunker business in front-line commercial trading role.

Brooklyn Bridge and New York City skyline. Minerva Bunkering recruiting Americas sales manager as it targets regional growth  

New York-based manager is sought to build customer base across North and South America.

Marine battery container. AYK Energy to unveil swappable containerised marine battery system at SMM Hamburg  

The system claims to remove key cost and engineering barriers to marine electrification.


↑  Back to Top