This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 21 Mar 2018, 10:51 GMT

Frontline cites bunker prices as key reason for rise in voyage costs


Crude shipper also warns of higher compliance costs linked with sulphur limits and energy efficiency standards.


Frontline funnel with company logo.
Image credit: Frontline
Crude transportation specialist Frontline says in its annual report for 2017, released on Tuesday, that the rise in bunker costs was a key reason for the company's year-on-year (YoY) increase in voyage expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Frontline recorded a rise of $11.8 million that was primarily due to the jump in marine fuel prices, the company said.

In 2017, Frontline's voyage expenses and commissions amounted to $259.3 million, which was an increase of $97.7 million, or 60.4 percent, on the $161.6 million posted in 2016.

The other main reasons for the rise in voyage expenses and commissions were said to be increases of $80.4 million, $34.5 million and $8.6 million attributed to the delivery of various tankers and VLCCs.

Compliance costs

In its annual report, Frontline was also keen to stress that "we believe that all our vessels are currently compliant in all material respects with these regulations" when referring to air emissions standards.

At the same time, however, the company did warn that the upcoming 2020 global cap requiring ships to use fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5 percent, plus existing Emission Control Area (ECA) rules not permitting the use of fuel with sulphur levels above 0.1 percent, "may cause us to incur additional costs".

Additionally, mandatory energy efficiency standards for new ships - where by 2025, all new ships built will need to be 30 percent more energy efficient than those constructed in 2014 - "could cause us to incur additional compliance costs", Frontline noted.

"If further ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations," Frontline also stressed.

Bunker swaps

In terms of bunker swap agreements, Frontline explained in its latest annual report that in August 2015 it entered into four bunker swap agreements whereby the fixed rate on 4,000 metric tonnes per calendar month was switched to a floating rate. The contracts ended in December 2016.

The fair value of these swaps at December 31, 2016 was nil. A non-cash mark to market gain of $1.9 million was recorded in 2016 and a loss of $2.3 million was posted in 2015.

Key financial results

As previously revealed in the release of Frontline's annual results on February 28, the company posted a loss of $264.9 million last year after achieving a net profit of $117.1 million and $154.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

Total operating revenues between January and December declined by $108.0 million, or 14.3 percent, to $646.3 million, whilst operating expenses rose by $270.8 million, or 47.2 percent, to $845.0 million.


Damen ASD Tug 2713 Fuel Flexible (FF) vessel graphic. Damen receives methanol approval for ASD Tug 2713 fuel-flexible design  

Bureau Veritas and Dutch flag state grant approval, enabling construction of methanol-ready tugs.

Sing Fuels hiring graphic. Sing Fuels seeks supply trader for China-focused marine fuel procurement role  

Singapore-based firm recruiting for position involving supplier negotiations and market tracking across Asia.

Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. CHB2061. Zhoushan Changhong begins construction on third 11,400-teu LNG dual-fuel container ship  

CHB2061 is the third vessel in an 18-ship series for Oceanroutes, designed to exceed EEDI Phase III standards.

Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. CHB2050. Construction begins on fourth 19,000-teu LNG dual-fuel container ship for MSC  

Vessel is said to be the largest LNG dual-fuel container ship under construction in Zhejiang Province.

325,000-dwt Newcastlemax vessel render. WinGD secures first ethanol-fuelled engine orders for ocean-going vessels  

Swiss power firm to supply dual-fuel engines for two ore carriers operating under Vale charter.

Grimaldi ro-ro passenger vessel render. Auramarine to supply methanol fuel systems for six Grimaldi Group ro-pax vessels  

Finnish firm wins contract for methanol systems on Mediterranean vessels scheduled for delivery in 2028–2030.

Everllence office building. Everllence reports more than 160 orders for Mk10.7 two-stroke engine platform  

Modular engine design allows shipowners to switch between conventional and alternative fuels.

Rendering of an electric tug. Berg Propulsion to supply electric propulsion for Türkiye’s most powerful tugs  

Swedish firm contracted for four diesel-electric firefighting tugs with over 130-tonne bollard pull capacity.

Hyke F-15 Shuttle vessel render. Hyke partners with Pascal Technologies for electric ferry powertrain in Norway  

Pascal Technologies to supply integrated powertrain platform for Hyke F-15 Shuttle ordered by Cityboat.

VPS logo. The importance of fast turnaround times for bunker fuel analysis in today’s market | Thomas Schmidt, VPS  

Rapid and reliable fuel quality intelligence is critical to protecting vessels, machinery, operations and commercial performance.


↑  Back to Top