Fri 11 Feb 2011 07:02

Chemoil posts $9.5 million loss in 2010


Net loss said to be mainly due to losses incured in the first quarter and the slow pace of margin recovery.



Leading bunker supplier Chemoil has today announced that it generated a net loss attributable to equity holders for the full year 2010 of US$9.5 million - a result which was said to be due mainly to the losses incurred in the first quarter of 2010 and the slow pace of margin recovery throughout the year. The net loss for the year was US$21 million below the US$11.5 million profit achieved in 2009.

For the fourth quarter of 2010, Chemoil announced a profit before tax of US$ 3.7 million. One-time write-offs, including US$ 5.1 million for deferred tax assets of a subsidiary, resulted in a net loss attributable to equity holders of US$1.8 million for the quarter, down US$4.7 million on the US$2.9 million profit achieved during the last quarter of 2009.

Chemoil said the fourth quarter result was the strongest operating performance by the group in 2010 with its gross contribution per metric tonne (GCMT) reaching US$6.70 per tonne, up from US$6.30 per tonne in the fourth quarter of 2009. However, for the full year to December 2010 gross contribution per tonne declined by 29 percent to US$4.8 per tonne, down from US$6.8 per tonne the previous year.

Full year sales volumes rose by 500,000 tonnes, or 3 percent, to 15.6 million metric tonnes. Sales during the fourth quarter increased by 100,000 tonnes, or 3 percent, to 4.1 million metric tonnes,

Sales revenue increased by US$1,545.3 million, or 27 percent, in the full year to December 2010 to US$7,295.5 million, up from US$5,750.2 million in 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2010, revenue rose by US$151.6 million, or 8.2 percent, to US$1,991.4 million, up from US$1,839.8 million in the corresponding period a year earlier.

Commenting on the results, Chemoil’s Executive Chairman, Mike Bandy, said: "In the fourth quarter of 2010, we producedour best quarterly operating results for the year as the fruits of our operational improvements and cost cutting efforts began to take shape. However, we also decided to take conservative actions by making one-time write-offs which will better position the Chemoil Group going forward financially as the marine fuel margins begin to recover. The largest of the write offs is a US$ 5.1 million deferred tax asset of a subsidiary. In addition, there were other provisions taken for certain bad debts in one of our non-core subsidiaries.”

"Sales volume growth to the shipping segment continued to show strong performance in FY2010 as retail sales grew 6% and ex-wharf sales, which are ultimately sold to the shipping market, grew 60%. However, our business continued to be exposed to weak wholesale-retail margin spreads, although signs of improvement have been showing during the latter part of 2010 as reflected in our 4Q2010 results," the company said.

Chemoil’s Chief Financial Officer, Jerome Lorenzo, said: “We have continued to improve our operational efficiency through a rationalization of our operating assets resulting in better utilization rates in certain ports. These can be seen for example in the reduction in our barging and pipeline costs in 4Q2010, as well as in other expenses, after eliminating the one-time write-offs.”

Bandy concluded: "Since the time the Group’s performance was impacted by weak margins in 3Q2009 and 1Q2010, we have made significant improvements in our core operations. We have also taken a careful look at our assets and decided to take prudent measures to strengthen our financial condition going forward. These positive developments form the backdrop in which I pass the leadership baton to Chemoil’s new CEO, Mr Tom Reilly. While continuing to implement operational changes and refine the Group’s cost cutting measures, Mr Reilly will undoubtedly be able to focus on growing the Chemoil global franchise, such as the recent acquisition of OceanConnect Marine. The Group can also focus on realizing profit generating opportunities in a margin environment that is now showing some signs of improvement.”

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top