Fri 29 Oct 2010 05:56

Study highlights H2S limit concerns


ISO 8217 specification 'not a good safeguard' against encountering H2S close to where the fuel is stored.



A DNV Petroleum Services (DNVPS) field study on hydrogen sulphide (H2S) measurements in marine fuel has reiterated concerns about the reliability of the ISO 8217: 2010 maximum 2 mg/kg H2S limit as a safety net for ship personnel.

According to the International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals (ISGOTT), H2S content in liquid could produce an equivalent atmospheric concentration in the ratio of 1 (by weight) to 100 (by volume). This implies 2mg/kg H2S liquid content in bunkers could lead to a 200 ppm H2S vapour concentration. ISGOTT further recommends safety precautions to be taken if the H2S exposure in the working environment reaches 5 ppm by volume.

The DNVPS study, which has received support from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore and INTERTANKO, compared the liquid levels of H2S in heavy fuel oil stored in bunker barge tanks against the H2S gaseous levels in the tank atmosphere.

In total, 75 fuel samples representing 25 bunkerings were drawn from the barge tanks and receiving vessel manifolds in Singapore. These samples were tested for H2S liquid levels using the Seta Analytics H2S Analyser and the IP 570 test method referenced in ISO 8217: 2010.

The results were then matched against H2S gaseous readings from the tank headspace, taken from just above the oil surface. All 75 fuel samples contained H2S – averaging 0.94mg/kg – with the tested lowest level at 0.3mg/kg and the highest at 4mg/kg.

In three bunkerings (12% of the total 25 bunkerings), the tested fuel samples exceeded the 2mg/kg limit stated in ISO 8217: 2010; out of which two bunkerings yielded samples corresponding to over 5 ppm gaseous H2S levels detected above the fuel in the bunker tanks. More importantly, in two bunkerings (8% of the 25 bunkerings) where the samples had less than 2mg/kg liquid H2S, the corresponding gaseous H2S levels above the fuel exceeded 5 ppm.

The DNVPS field study also confirmed earlier industry findings that the H2S-releasing tendencies of heavy fuel oil were not dependent on the liquid H2S concentration in the fuel alone. As a case in point, measurements taken during the study showed fuel samples with the same H2S level could account for more than 5 ppm of gaseous H2S in the space above the fuel, or nothing at all.

“Our findings reinforce the view that the latest ISO 8217 marine fuel specification is not a good safeguard against the risk of encountering gaseous H2S close to where the fuel is stored or consumed,” said DNVPS managing director Tore Morten Wetterhus, who presented the H2S field study on October 28th 2010 at the 16th Singapore International Bunker Conference (SIBCON).

The DNVPS study also found that tested H2S levels in tank samples were consistently higher than those in specimens taken at the ship’s manifold, which would usually be sent to laboratories ashore for analysis. “This means actual H2S levels in fuel tanks and the surrounding atmosphere could in fact be higher than laboratory results suggest. There are now more indications that the 2mg/kg H2S limit in ISO 8217:2010 will create the proverbial false sense of security,” Mr Wetterhus said.

Mr Wetterhus hoped the DNVPS field study would encourage further investigations to improve the handling of H2S in marine fuel and help the industry better understand the complexities involved. These subsequent investigations should ideally be on a larger scale than the DNVPS field study, and involve alternative H2S test methods and equipment as well as testing in controlled environments where worst-case scenarios could be simulated, he said.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top