Tue 11 May 2010 06:43

0.1 percent survey reveals 'potentially critical issues'


New survey documents fuel segregation, filter choking and fuel pump seizure issues.



A DNV Petroleum Services (DNVPS) survey on the operational impact of the European Union 0.1% marine fuel sulphur limit – enforced on Jan 1 this year – has revealed potentially critical issues.

Among the 65 shipping companies that responded to the survey, 40 percent felt the EU member states were not harmonised in applying regulatory standards when verifying compliance with the 0.1% marine fuel sulphur limit.

According to DNVPS, this lack of uniformity could confuse and dampen the shipping community’s confidence in the ability of the EU to enforce its own environmental regulations.

“DNV had previously expressed concerns that the 0.1% sulphur cap effectively meant ships at berth in the community ports must use marine gas oil, notwithstanding many of the boilers on board would not have been modified by Jan 1 to burn this type of fuel,” said DNVPS managing director Tore Morten Wetterhus.

“Now that more ships are presumably equipped with the installations to minimize gas oil-related risks, such as fuel pump leakage and boiler explosion, shipboard personnel face new worries not knowing what to expect from port state inspections in different EU ports,” added Wetterhus.

Close to 40% of the respondents said their vessels did not have the tank flexibility to segregate gas oil and heavy fuel oil. Another 15% reported filter choking and fuel pump seizures when switching from normal sulphur heavy fuel oil to the much more expensive gas oil on entering the EU community ports.

Surprisingly, almost a third of the respondents did not routinely test the quality of their gas oil purchases, despite the risks of their ships consuming fuels not compliant with the 0.1% fuel sulphur limit.

In the worst case, an untested fuel could be so severely ‘off-specification’ that it causes substantial engine damage and jeopardizes the safety of crew and cargo at sea, DNVPS said.

“As a marine fuel management company, it is especially unsettling for DNVPS to find that some ship operators are gambling with safety when they choose to use gas oil of unknown quality. There must be much more awareness on problems commonly associated with this type of fuel; for instance, low flashpoint and low viscosity,” Wetterhus cautioned.

On a brighter note, he said 90% of the survey respondents believed their crews were familiar with the onboard routines for complying with the EU fuel regulations, but many also felt continuous training would be necessary.

To update the shipping community on marine fuel regulations, related operational challenges, and the latest changes to the ISO 8217 marine fuel specification, DNVPS has been organising seminars and round-table discussions in its key markets. Targeted locations include Singapore, the Netherlands, Norway, Greece, Germany, Dubai, USA and Canada.

More about DNVPS marine fuel seminars and round-table discussions:

May-June 2010 schedule

May 18 Dubai
May 19 Piraeus
May 26 Mahwah
(New Jersey)
May 26 Rotterdam
May 27 Oslo
May 27 Leer (Germany)
May 27 Istanbul
Jun 4 Hamburg
Jun 22 Bergen

Opening of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 83rd Session, April 7, 2025. IMO approves pricing mechanism based on GHG intensity thresholds  

Charges to be levied on ships that do not meet yearly GHG fuel intensity reduction targets.

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.

Terminal Aquaviário de Rio Grande (TERIG), operated by Transpetro. Petrobras secures ISCC EU RED certification for B24 biofuel blend at Rio Grande  

Blend consisting of 24% FAME is said to have been rigorously tested to meet international standards.

Avenir LNG logo on sea background. Stolt-Nielsen to fully control Avenir LNG with acquisition  

Share purchase agreement to buy all shares from Golar LNG and Aequitas.

Seaspan Energy's 7,600 cbm LNG bunkering vessel, s1067, built by Nantong CIMC Sinopacific Offshore & Engineering Co., Ltd. Bureau Veritas supports launch of CIMC SOE's LNG bunkering vessel  

Handover of Seaspan Energy's cutting-edge 7,600-cbm vessel completed.


↑  Back to Top