Thu 4 Oct 2012 09:43

'Disappointment' at IMO fuel study vote


Concern voiced over decision to reject a call to accelerate a study into the global availability of low sulphur fuel.



Peter Hinchliffe, Secretary General of the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) has expressed 'disappointment and concern' at a decision by the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) to reject a call to make an earlier start on a study into the global availability of low sulphur fuel for ships.

In a tight vote, a small majority of IMO Member States rejected an ICS submission calling for the earlier study, which now looks set to be completed in 2018.

Speaking after the vote at the MEPC meeting in London, Hinchliffe remarked: "Some governments still appear to have their heads in the sand with respect to fuel availability. What will be the impact of ships switching to distillate on the availability of diesel for road transport or heating oil for homes? We still think it’s essential that a global fuel study is carried out sufficiently in advance of 2020 to give the refiners adequate time to invest and react. The major refinery upgrading required could take a minimum of four or five years, perhaps longer, and we believe that completing the study in 2018 would simply be too late."

“ICS has not given up, and we will bring the issue back to IMO next year. The issue is just too important. The enormity of the switch to distillate and its economic impact on shipping, and indeed the world economy as whole, should not be underestimated or swept under the carpet.”

ICS members represent more than 80% of the world’s merchant fleet. Ship owners and operators are concerned whether low sulphur fuel will be available to comply with IMO's 0.5% limit on sulphur emissions that will come into effect within the Emission Control Areas (ECAs) in 2015, and globally in 2020.

Depending on the outcome of the review in 2018 this requirement could be deferred by the IMO to 1 January 2025.

Port of Gothenburg Energy Port. Swedish biomethane bunkered in Gothenburg  

Test delivery performed by St1 and St1 Biokraft, who aim to become large-scale suppliers.

Image from Cockett Marine Oil presentation. Cockett to be closed down after 45 years  

End of an era as shareholders make decision based on 'non-core nature' of Cockett's business.

Petrobras logo. Petrobras confirms prompt availability of VLS B24 at Rio Grande  

Lead time for barge deliveries currently five days.

Opening of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 83rd Session, April 7, 2025. IMO approves pricing mechanism based on GHG intensity thresholds  

Charges to be levied on ships that do not meet yearly GHG fuel intensity reduction targets.

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.


↑  Back to Top