Wed 6 Jan 2010 12:47

Low sulphur additive offers 'trouble-free performance'


Lubricity Improver for low sulphur MGO offers to protect injection pumps in auxiliary engines and boilers.



Press Release:

Pacific Petroleum Lubricity Improver for LS MGO

Following the European Union (EU) rule mandating consumption of 0.1% sulphur content marine gasoil (MGO) in port, shipowners are investigating all options to ensure that auxiliary diesel engines and boilers will safely accommodate the new fuel.

The EU mandate is only for vessels at berth. For vessels calling at California ports, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) now mandates that vessels must operate on a 0.5% sulphur distillate fuel no less than 24 nautical miles (nm) from port, a standard that requires a transition for main engines operating on heavy fuel to the new low sulphur distillate fuel.

To what extent are shipowners ready? Are the precautions and procedures issued to date from engine makers and pump manufacturers sufficient for safe and trouble-free operation? And for vessels that are already consuming the 0.1% sulphur fuel what problems, if any, have developed?

In this information we will look at these questions and investigate low sulphur MGO, and why the refining process used to produce it, can create serious deficiencies with adverse consequences affecting vessel operation. We will also review widespread misconceptions about the impact of these fuels on proper fuel pump lubrication, and the available remedies. The primary concerns about low sulphur MGO have focused on four areas:

Viscosity: Low sulphur distillates have relatively low viscosity, ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 centistoke (cst). Fuel pumps depend upon an appropriate viscosity to meet the required volumetric capacity, an especially important consideration in maintaining proper feed rates to boilers.

Lubricity: 0.1 % sulphur MGO has greatly reduced the lubricating value for fuel delivery systems. The naturally occurring lubricating components in heavy fuels, and in 1.5% sulphur distillate fuels, simply do not exist in 0.1 % sulphur MGO fuels – exposing pumping systems to damage and potential catastrophic failure.

Lubricating oil: Engines operating on heavy fuels require a higher total base number (TBN) lubricant to address high sulphur content. Unless the lubricant is changed to a lower TBN, engines operating for extended periods on 0.1% MGO still using a high TBN lubricant run the risk of accumulating excessive calcium salt deposits in the combustion chamber, among other damages.

Boiler operation: For vessels with auxiliary boilers, considerable modification to these units must be made, including changes in burners, atomization, and installation of additional fuel pumping and storage equipment.

Our focus here is strictly with the first two issues: Viscosity and lubricity. While engine and fuel pump manufacturers still continue to evaluate these areas, most have now issued minimum standards for fuel viscosity and specific recommendations for the process of changing from heavy fuels to MGO during vessel operations.

But many questions remain, and in some discussions, assumptions are still being widely circulated that may possibly put vessels at risk. One common assumption is that it is sulphur, and sulphur only, that is responsible for providing fuel lubricity. A second assumption is that cooling a fuel to elevate viscosity will provide a thicker, oily film on moving parts that will protect fuel pumps and injection equipment from excessive wear.

In the United States, for example, low sulphur diesel fuels have been mandated for automotive use for nearly 20 years, first with a 500 parts per million (ppm) – or 0.05% – sulphur fuel, and now, with a 15 ppm fuel known as ultra low sulphur diesel (ULSD). While low sulphur fuels may be new to international shipping, the operational experience on both high and medium speed diesel engines on these fuels in the US is longstanding.

After the 1990 introduction of 500 ppm sulphur fuel in California, serious problems immediately developed. Some fuel injection pumps suffered catastrophic failure. Others experienced excessive wear and severe leakage, with seals shrinking owing to the reduced aromatic content of the fuel.

The Pacific Petroleum Lubricity Improver (PP-LI), additive for LS Fuel oil and MGO will provide the lubrication properties to the fuel for trouble free performance. The additive is to be added directly into the service tank with the dose 1 liters per 1000 liters MGO during the first weeks of use. Thereafter the dose can be reduced to 1 liters per 2000 – 4000 liters MGO.

Specifications:

Appearance/Odor: Medium brown/slight alcohol smell.
Specific Gravity: Range 1.067 – 1.095 @ 75F
Percent volatile by volume: (%) – 10.0
Solubility in water: Insoluble
Composition: Extreme pressure lubricant.
Blending agents. Corrosion inhibitor.
Viscosity: 39,1 = 4@ 75F. (Brookfield Viscometer – Model LVF)
Ash: 0,93% = 0,1%@ 77C
Boiling point: (F) 397
Vapor Pressure: (mm Hg) 0,4 mm @ 20C.
Vapor Density: (Air = 1) 5,0.

Packing and Shipping Information:

55 US Gallon Steel Barrel. (208 lit.)
Labels: NON HAZARDOUS NON FLAMMABLE.

Take the opportunity to become a distributor for this additive to your bunker customers, they will all need it to protect their injection pumps in their auxiliary engines and boilers when their vessels call in Europe and SECA area.

Opening of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 83rd Session, April 7, 2025. IMO approves pricing mechanism based on GHG intensity thresholds  

Charges to be levied on ships that do not meet yearly GHG fuel intensity reduction targets.

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.

Terminal Aquaviário de Rio Grande (TERIG), operated by Transpetro. Petrobras secures ISCC EU RED certification for B24 biofuel blend at Rio Grande  

Blend consisting of 24% FAME is said to have been rigorously tested to meet international standards.

Avenir LNG logo on sea background. Stolt-Nielsen to fully control Avenir LNG with acquisition  

Share purchase agreement to buy all shares from Golar LNG and Aequitas.

Seaspan Energy's 7,600 cbm LNG bunkering vessel, s1067, built by Nantong CIMC Sinopacific Offshore & Engineering Co., Ltd. Bureau Veritas supports launch of CIMC SOE's LNG bunkering vessel  

Handover of Seaspan Energy's cutting-edge 7,600-cbm vessel completed.


↑  Back to Top