Wed 2 Dec 2009 08:14

Countdown to Copenhagen (Part 2): Marine bunker emissions in OECD countries


Marine fuel emissions in Europe, North America and the Pacific are examined in our second feature article in the run up to Copenhagen.



In the second of our "Countdown to Copenhagen" series of articles, we look at CO2 emissions from marine fuels in OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries located in Europe, North America and the Pacific.

The countries are as follows:

OECD North America - Canada, Mexico, United States

OECD Pacific - Australia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand

OECD Europe - Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom

According to recent data published by the International Energy Agency(IEA), OECD Europe accounted for 174.05 million tonnes of CO2, or 28.5 percent, of global emissions from marine fuels in 2007, compared with 122.1 million tonnes, or 35 percent of worldwide marine bunker emissions in 1971. The 2007 data therefore represents a 42.5 percent increase in CO2 emissions over this 36-year period even though the percentage of global bunker emissions has fallen by 6.5 percent.

OECD North America accounted for 100.67 million tonnes of CO2, or 16.5 percent of the world's marine fuel emissions in 2007, up 74 million tonnes from 26.67 million tonnes in 1971. Significantly, this represents a 277.5 percent increase in CO2 emissions in just under four decades.

Meanwhile, OECD Pacific emissions from marine fuels were 53.17 million tonnes of CO2 in 2007 compared with 57.55 million tonnes in 1971, showing that CO2 emissions have actually fallen both in real terms and as a percentage of global marine fuel emissions.

Please find a table below, which provides a summary of CO2 emissions in OECD Europe, OECD North America and OECD Pacific.

Year OECD Europe % OECD Namerica % OECD Pacific % Global (Marine Fuels)
1971 122.1 35.4 26.67 7.7 57.55 16.7 344.5
1972 134.49 37.3 26 7.2 55.63 15.4 360.4
1973 135.05 35.5 33.34 8.8 65.12 17.1 380.8
1974 115.5 32.6 35.4 10.0 65.25 18.4 354.5
1975 112.87 34.3 36.51 11.1 70.48 21.4 328.6
1976 117.96 34.8 48.24 14.2 56.46 16.7 338.7
1977 112.53 33.2 58.54 17.3 52.23 15.4 338.5
1978 113.34 33.3 71.98 21.2 47.12 13.9 340.2
1979 107.76 30.7 83.89 23.9 48.64 13.8 351.4
1980 99.26 28.9 94.91 27.6 44.06 12.8 344
1981 97.17 30.6 84.59 26.6 41.19 13.0 318
1982 93.09 32.6 68.09 23.9 29.43 10.3 285.4
1983 86.18 32.4 60.86 22.9 27.41 10.3 265.9
1984 82.77 30.7 60.12 22.3 28.39 10.5 269.2
1985 89.76 30.8 57.76 19.8 28.63 9.8 291.7
1986 105.39 33.9 56.42 18.2 24.53 7.9 310.6
1987 102.97 33.7 56.53 18.5 23.91 7.8 305.8
1988 104.91 32.6 60.99 19.0 23.42 7.3 321.8
1989 105.42 32.8 63.93 19.9 25.23 7.8 321.5
1990 110.68 31.0 95.58 26.8 26.11 7.3 356.9
1991 109.43 29.5 100.86 27.2 29.36 7.9 370.4
1992 110.81 27.9 104.92 26.4 31.87 8.0 396.9
1993 113.63 29.5 92.33 24.0 36.75 9.5 384.9
1994 109.61 28.1 90.6 23.2 38.51 9.9 389.7
1995 113.27 28.2 95.57 23.8 37.04 9.2 402
1996 120.11 29.5 90.33 22.2 33.76 8.3 406.9
1997 131.1 31.1 79.1 18.8 39.31 9.3 421.8
1998 135.95 31.9 78.34 18.4 40.77 9.6 425.8
1999 130.42 28.6 89.14 19.5 41.68 9.1 456.6
2000 138.53 29.7 96.39 20.7 40.86 8.8 466
2001 141.81 32.3 68.38 15.6 37.86 8.6 439
2002 144.86 31.9 78.06 17.2 37.71 8.3 454.8
2003 146.22 31.4 64.57 13.9 41.23 8.8 466
2004 157.2 30.1 81.07 15.5 44.42 8.5 521.7
2005 164.34 29.9 86.34 15.7 56.73 10.3 549.7
2006 172.53 29.7 92.57 15.9 56.09 9.7 580.6
2007 174.05 28.5 100.67 16.5 53.17 8.7 610.4

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.

Terminal Aquaviário de Rio Grande (TERIG), operated by Transpetro. Petrobras secures ISCC EU RED certification for B24 biofuel blend at Rio Grande  

Blend consisting of 24% FAME is said to have been rigorously tested to meet international standards.

Avenir LNG logo on sea background. Stolt-Nielsen to fully control Avenir LNG with acquisition  

Share purchase agreement to buy all shares from Golar LNG and Aequitas.

Seaspan Energy's 7,600 cbm LNG bunkering vessel, s1067, built by Nantong CIMC Sinopacific Offshore & Engineering Co., Ltd. Bureau Veritas supports launch of CIMC SOE's LNG bunkering vessel  

Handover of Seaspan Energy's cutting-edge 7,600-cbm vessel completed.

The world's first methanol-fuelled container ship, Laura Maersk. Methanol as a marine fuel | Steve Bee, VPS  

How environmental legislation has driven the development of low-sulphur fuels and methanol-ready ships.


↑  Back to Top