Thu 28 Aug 2008 08:02

Cargo ships to submit oil spill response plans


Coast Guard begins enforcement of oil spill response plans for "nontank" vessels.



The U.S. Coast Guard has announced the beginning of enforcement of the requirements for owners and operators of large cargo vessels, or "nontank" vessels, to prepare and submit plans for responding to a worst case oil spill from their vessels.

Should a nontank vessel be found operating in a U.S. port or waterway without a properly submitted response plan, the Coast Guard Captain of the Port will exercise authority under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 and impose operational controls, as necessary, on the vessel to safeguard the port.

"Oil carried as fuel in large cargo ships can result in a major oil spill in the event of an accident," said Rear Adm. Brian M. Salerno, assistant commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard's Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Directorate.

"Although we work to prevent accidents in the first place, this enforcement policy will make sure that cargo ships, such as tankers, have pre-identified and arranged for the resources needed to respond effectively, should an accident occur."

A nontank vessel is described by the U.S Coast Guard as a self-propelled vessel of 400 gross tons or greater that operates on the navigable waters of the U.S., carries oil of any kind as fuel for main propulsion and is not a tank vessel. Tank vessels are required to have response plans under 33 CFR part 155, subpart D, and are already screened by the Coast Guard for compliance prior to port entry.

In a statement released this week, the U.S Coast Guard said the oil spill of the container ship Cosco Busan in San Francisco Bay on November 7th 2007 showed that the risks associated with oil spills from large nontank vessels are significant.

The Coast Guard Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and required owners and operators of nontank vessels to prepare and submit by August 9, 2005, plans for responding to a worst case discharge and to a substantial threat of such a discharge of oil from their vessels.

The Coast Guard published a Federal Register Notice on June 23, 2008, informing nontank vessel owners and operators that the Coast Guard will begin actively enforcing the 2004 Act by screening all nontank vessels prior to their port arrival for plan submission.

Each plan will need to ensure by contract or other approved means the availability of private personnel and equipment necessary to remove to the maximum extent practicable a worst case discharge (including a discharge resulting from a fire or explosion), and to mitigate or prevent a substantial threat of such a discharge. It also describes the training, equipment testing, periodic unannounced drills and response actions of the crew.

In an effort to devote resources to those nontank vessels that pose the greatest risk in the event of a worst case oil spill, the Coast Guard's screening and enforcement efforts will focus on those nontank vessels of 1,600 gross tons or greater. Nontank vessels of less than 1,600 gross tons are considered to pose less of a threat, but will still be required to submit response plans.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top