Tue 8 Mar 2016, 08:44 GMT

DFDS reports decline in bunker consumption


Shipping firm sets 5 percent reduction target for 2017.



Shipping and logistics company DFDS has confirmed that bunker fuel consumption fell by 16.7 percent in 2015.

In its annual report, the Copenhagen-headquartered firm confirmed that consumption of bunker fuel and goods included in operating costs was 1,919,414 tonnes last year compared with 2,303,533 tonnes in 2014, representing a decrease of 384,119 tonnes, or 16.7 percent.

Target for 2017

After previously achieving a 10 percent reduction of the bunker consumption over a five year period, DFDS has set a new target of a 5 percent reduction to be achieved by 2017.

Revenue from bunker surcharges

Due to the recent drop in the price of oil and bunker fuel, DFDS has stated that revenue from bunker surcharges is expected to "decrease significantly" in 2016.

Including bunker surcharges, DFDS expects revenue growth to be around 3 percent.

Hedging

Summary:
- Total hedging as a percentage of bunker consumption in 2015: 92 percent
- Commercial hedging in 2015: 87 percent
- Financial hedging in 2015: 5 percent

Currently, 87 percent of DFDS's bunker consumption is commercially hedged through bunker clauses in freight customer contracts. The remaining consumption is consumed on passenger routes and financially hedged as appropriate.

According to DFDS, a price increase of 1 percent compared to the price level at year-end 2015 - approximately USD 306 per tonne for marine gas oil (MGO) and USD 125 per tonne for heavy fuel oil (HFO) - is estimated to have a negative impact on financial performance of around DKK 2 million (USD 295,000) in 2016.

Commenting on its hedging policy, DFDS said in its annual report: "The most important financial risk factors for DFDS are diesel and bunker prices, interest rates, currencies, investments and liquidity. It is the policy of the Group not to enter into active speculation in financial risks. The intention of the financial risk management of the Group is only to manage the financial risks attached to operational and financial activities. The Board of Directors annually approves the financial risk management policy and strategy. In addition, DFDS has established a Bunker Committee, which monitors hedging levels and market development on a monthly basis. Please refer to the section Risk Factors in the Management review."

DFDS added: "The cost of bunkers constitutes a specific and significant operational risk partly due to large fluctuations in bunker prices and partly due to the total annual bunker costs of approximately DKK 1,304m or 10% of the Group's revenue in 2015 (2014: DKK 1,692m or 13% of the Group's revenue). In the freight industry, bunker costs are primarily hedged by price-adjustment clauses (BAF) in freight customer contracts. In the passenger industry, fluctuations in the cost of bunkers are reflected in the ticket price to the extent possible. In addition, hedging transactions, primarily bunker swaps, are used to manage risk of the remaining bunker costs.

"DFDS Group uses bunker swaps to hedge the variability in bunker costs that are not commercially hedged through customer agreements. An increase in the bunker price of 10% compared to the actual bunker price at balance sheet date would, other things being equal, have had a hypothetical positive effect on the Group's equity reserve for hedging of DKK 7m (2014: DKK 6m). This is due to the bunker contracts for future delivery entered to hedge the cost for bunkers. A decrease in the bunker price would have had a similar negative effect.

"The sensitivity analysis on bunker contracts has been prepared under the assumptions that the effect is calculated all else being equal on the bunker contracts entered at the balance sheet date; the hedges are 100% effective and based on the actual market situation and expectations to the development in the bunker prices."

Image: Ficaria Seaways


Container ship at harbour. Skuld warns of unusual chemical compounds in Southeast Asian marine fuels  

Marine insurer reports fuels meeting ISO 8217 standards but containing high levels of hydrocarbon compounds.

Arsenio Dominguez, IMO. IMO chief urges progress on net-zero framework amid Hormuz crisis  

Arsenio Dominguez calls for constructive dialogue as MEPC 84 tackles greenhouse gas measures and ballast water regulations.

Monjasa Shaker vessel. Monjasa reflags UAE-based tankers to Emirates registry  

Marine fuels supplier transitions first of three vessels from Liberian to UAE flag.

Ammonia bunkering at Port of Ulsan. Lotte Fine Chemical completes world’s first commercial ammonia bunkering at Ulsan  

South Korean chemical company claims to have established a complete green ammonia value chain.

London skyline. Propeller Fuels seeks bunker trader for London office  

Marine fuel supplier advertises for trader to manage procurement, sales and client relationships.

Windward Hamburg vessel. Fincantieri’s VARD launches first of four offshore wind vessels for Windward Offshore  

VARD 4 19 design vessel features battery hybrid propulsion and green methanol preparation.

Singapore Maritime Week panel session. Singapore industry leaders call for regulatory clarity on maritime energy transition  

SSA councillors highlight need for government support and clear policies to enable alternative fuel adoption.

Aerial view of container vessel at sea. Seaspan and Technolog unveil LNG feeder design with four-week ammonia conversion pathway  

Lloyd’s Register grants approval for a 3,370 TEU vessel concept designed for swift transition to zero-carbon fuel.

David Foo, MPA. Singapore’s MPA backs LNG as part of multi-fuel strategy for shipping decarbonisation  

Authority emphasises regulatory frameworks and workforce development as sector navigates geopolitical uncertainty and energy transition.

ABS and PIL sign MoU. ABS and PIL partner on book-and-claim emissions verification  

Classification society to verify fuel consumption and emissions data for shipping line’s alternative fuel claims.