Thu 13 Aug 2015 16:58

Maersk Line posts decline in Q2 profit as bunker costs plummet


The average bunker price paid was $244 lower than during the second quarter of 2014.



Maersk Line today reports that its net operating profit after tax during the second quarter of 2015 declined by $40 million, or 7.3 percent, to $507 million, compared to $547 million during the corresponding period last year.

Revenue of $6.3 billion was 9.2 percent lower than in 2014, primarily driven by the decline in the average freight rate to $2,261 per forty foot equivalent container unit (FFE), only partly offset by a volume increase of 3.7 percent to 2,484,000 FFE.

The freight rate decline was largely attributable to bunker cost savings being passed through to the customers and to deteriorating market conditions on the Asia-Europe trade, Maersk said.

Recognised freight revenue was $5.6 billion, compared to $6.3 billion last year. Other revenue was $617 million, up from $612 million in 2014.

Global container demand is expected to have grown between 1-2 percent during the second quarter of 2015 compared to last year. The soft market development was primarily due to weak imports into Europe, Maersk said.

Unit costs decreased by 13.1 percent to $2,246/FFE, benefitting from decreased bunker prices and the U.S. dollar appreciation.

Bunker costs

The average bunker price paid by Maersk Line - the world's biggest bunker buyer - during the second quarter of 2015 was $335 per tonne - down $244, or 42.1 percent, on the $579-per-tonne figure recorded during the second quarter of 2014.

During the first six months of 2015, the average bunker price was $346 per tonne compared to $580 per tonne during the corresponding period last year.

Maersk Line's average bunker price during the whole of 2014 was $562 per tonne.

Overall bunker costs decreased by 40.1 percent compared to the second quarter of 2014. Bunker efficiency remained on a par with last year at 902 kilogrammes/FFE (903 kg/FFE), Maersk said.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top