Mon 12 Dec 2011 14:36

Mitropoulos: IMO should push ahead with MBMs debate


Secretary-General says IMO should aim to bring its action plan on climate change to a completion in a 'reasonably short time'.



Statement: Source - International Maritime Organization (IMO)

The United Nations Climate Change Conference (UNFCCC) has concluded its seventeenth session (COP 17/CMP 7) in Durban, South Africa, meeting from 28 November to the early hours of 11 December 2011.

As anticipated, the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), serving also as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, focused more on rallying political will for action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (in particular, the issue of the second commitment period for emission reductions under the Kyoto Protocol and the establishment and making operational of the Green Climate Fund, as decided under the Cancún Agreements of 2010), rather than on pushing ahead with the preparation and adoption of a legally binding instrument to that effect.

As far as sectoral approaches are concerned, including international maritime transportation, the conference noted the progress made by IMO in adopting, in July 2011, regulations on energy efficiency for ships under MARPOL Annex VI, as part of its three-pillar work plan to limit or reduce the emission of greenhouse gases from international shipping, as well as the Organization’s continuing work on market-based measures (MBMs).

Although the question of what action needed to be taken on sectoral approaches was discussed at length, there was no suggestion that the reduction or limitation of greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping should not continue to be for IMO to consider and act upon. Indeed, IMO was invited to continue informing future conferences and their subsidiary bodies of the Organization’s further progress on this issue.

Commenting on the outcome of the Durban Conference, IMO Secretary-General Efthimios E. Mitropoulos [pictured] stated that, in his view, “by adopting the Durban Platform, the conference has once again moved forward several items on its agenda, achieved further commitments under the Kyoto Protocol, agreed a process leading to a new legally binding instrument and put in place mechanisms to give effect to the high-priority issues emerging from last year’s Cancún Agreements, including those related to technology, adaptation and climate finance."

As to the objectives pursued at the Conference by IMO, namely:

- making the UNFCCC Parties aware of the significant advances made by the Organization on all three pillars of the Organization’s work plan (i.e. technical, operational and market-based measures); and

- that the organization should continue pursuing its work by further refining the adopted technical and operational measures and by continuing to develop a complementary market-based measure,

Mr Mitropoulos added that, “although the Durban Conference did not make specific decisions on the international transport sector, the progress thus far made by IMO has been widely acknowledged throughout the negotiating bodies of the UNFCCC process. In the meantime, the status quo of the Kyoto Protocol concerning the pursuance, through IMO, of efforts to reduce or limit GHG emissions from international shipping remains unaltered.”

“Against this background”, he added, “IMO should continue, through next year’s two sessions of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), its work to progress its debate on market-based measures so that it can, through meaningful and inclusive negotiations, bring its action plan on climate change to a completion in a reasonably short time. Such an outcome will enable the organization to present further tangible results to next year’s UN Conference on Climate Change, scheduled to reconvene in Qatar in December 2012, thus demonstrating its Members’ and the shipping industry’s continued commitment and determination to add IMO’s contribution to the world efforts to combat climate change."

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.

Terminal Aquaviário de Rio Grande (TERIG), operated by Transpetro. Petrobras secures ISCC EU RED certification for B24 biofuel blend at Rio Grande  

Blend consisting of 24% FAME is said to have been rigorously tested to meet international standards.

Avenir LNG logo on sea background. Stolt-Nielsen to fully control Avenir LNG with acquisition  

Share purchase agreement to buy all shares from Golar LNG and Aequitas.

Seaspan Energy's 7,600 cbm LNG bunkering vessel, s1067, built by Nantong CIMC Sinopacific Offshore & Engineering Co., Ltd. Bureau Veritas supports launch of CIMC SOE's LNG bunkering vessel  

Handover of Seaspan Energy's cutting-edge 7,600-cbm vessel completed.

The world's first methanol-fuelled container ship, Laura Maersk. Methanol as a marine fuel | Steve Bee, VPS  

How environmental legislation has driven the development of low-sulphur fuels and methanol-ready ships.


↑  Back to Top