Thu 12 Nov 2009 15:40

Bunker Index (BIX) Vs WTI trend comparison


Average global bunker price is compared against WTI crude between April and October 2009.



Following up on our previous trend comparison between Singapore 380-cst and WTI crude in the BunkerTrends article entitled 'Singapore 380-cst average rises 5% less than WTI in October', today we have compared the Bunker Index (BIX) - the average global bunker price expressed in US$ per tonne - against WTI.

The data shows that during the month of October the Bunker Index (BIX) rose 9.6 percent between October 1 and October 30 from $501.05 per tonne to $552.51 per tonne. During the same period, WTI crude rose by 8.7 percent from $70.82 per barrel to 77.00 per barrel.

When analysing the difference between the the lowest and highest price in October - a good indicator of intra-month price volatility - WTI showed an $11.42 per barrel, or 16.3 percent, difference between the lowest($69.95) and highest($81.37) settlement price. In contrast BIX prices recorded only a 10.8 percent difference betweeen the lowest($501.05) and highest ($555.06) intra-month price.

Looking at monthly averages, similar conclusions can be made with BIX versus WTI as in yesterday's article when Singapore 380-cst was compared with WTI. Whilst the average monthly Singapore 380-cst price rose by 3.4 percent in October, the BIX monthly average increased in similar fashion by 3.7 percent. In contrast the average WTI settlement price rose by 8.4 percent during the same period.

Significantly, when looking price trends between April and October the average monthly BIX price has risen by only 38.3 percent, from $382.16 to 528.47 per tonne, whilst the WTI has surged 51.8 percent from $49.95 to $75.82 per barrel, showing that average monthly global bunker prices have increased at a lower rate than crude.

When looking solely at the difference in price between April 1 and October 30, the WTI increased by $28.61 per barrel, or 59.1 percent, from $48.39 to $77.00 per barrel, whilst the BIX rose by 51.5 percent from $364.70 to 552.51 per tonne.

Please click on the graph accompanying this article to enlarge.

WTI - October 2009

Average Settlement Price: 75.82
Lowest Settlement Price: 69.95 (October 2)
Highest Settlement Price: 81.37 (October 21)
Low-High Difference($): 11.42
Low-High Difference (%): 16.3%

October 1: 70.82
October 30: 77.00
Price change ($): +6.18
Price change (%): +8.7%

Bunker Index (BIX)- October 2009

Average Price: 528.47
Lowest Price: 501.05 (October 5)
Highest Price: 555.06 (October 23)
Low-High difference ($): 54.01
Low-High Difference (%): 10.8%

October 1: 504.29
October 30: 552.51
Price change ($): +48.22
Price change (%): +9.6 %

WTI - Average Monthly Settlement Prices

MonthPrice +/- ($) +/- (%)
Oct 09 75.82 +6.35 +8.4%
Sep 09 69.47 -1.79 -2.5%
Aug 09 71.26 +6.97 +10.8%
Jul 09 64.29 -5.41 -7.8%
Jun 09 69.70 +10.49 +17.7%
May 09 59.21 +9.26 +18.5%
Apr 09 49.95 +1.85 +3.8%


Bunker Index (BIX) - Average Monthly Prices

MonthPrice +/- ($) +/- (%)
Oct 09528.47+18.88+3.7%
Sep 09509.59-14.00-2.7%
Aug 09523.59+63.19+13.73%
Jul 09460.40-24.78-5.1%
Jun 09485.18+65.07+15.5%
May 09420.11+37.95+9.9%
Apr 09382.16


April - October 2009

WTI Settlement Price

Apr 01: 48.39
Oct 30: 77.00
Price change ($): +28.61
Price change (%): +59.1%

Apr Average: 49.95
Oct Average: 75.82
Price change ($): +25.87
Price change (%): +51.8%

Bunker Index (BIX)

Apr 01: 364.70
Oct 30: 552.51
Price change ($): +187.81
Price change (%): +51.5%

Apr Average: 382.16
Oct Average: 528.47
Price change ($): +146.31
Price change (%): +38.3%

A screenshot taken from Peninsula's homepage on October 4, 2024. Peninsula to receive first of four tankers in Q2 2025  

Methanol-ready vessels form part of bunker supplier's fleet renewal programme.

Stephen Robinson, pictured on his appointment as Head of Bunker Strategy and Procurement at Tankers International. Stephen Robinson heads up bunker desk at Tankers International  

Former Bomin and Cockett MD appointed Head of Bunker Strategy and Procurement.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.


↑  Back to Top


 Related Links