Wed 11 Nov 2009 09:48

IBIA issues sulphur content warning


Association warns that ships could be subject to different sulphur limits from July 2010.



The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) has warned that, from July next year, passenger ships operating in European territorial waters could, during the course of one single voyage, be subject to three different limits regulating the amount of sulphur content in the fuels they consume.

In a statement, IBIA said: “This situation results from a reduction, from 1.50 per to 1.00 per cent, in the maximum allowable sulphur content of fuels used by ships operating in designated Emission Control Areas (ECAs) covering the Baltic and North Sea/English Channel. This compares with the 1.50 per cent sulphur limit applicable to passenger ships when operating on a regular service to or from EC ports under European law.”

Commenting on the issue, Ian Adams, chief executive of IBIA, said “Under this scenario, a passenger vessel leaving Northern Europe for a Mediterranean cruise will be required, with effect from July 1 next year, to burn a maximum 1.00 per cent sulphur fuel in the Baltic and North Sea and a maximum 1.50 per cent in the Mediterranean, while potentially being able to burn 4.50 per cent outside EU territorial waters.

“IBIA understands that, since the rules covering passenger ship emissions are contained in an EU directive, they are not affected by any change in the IMO standard for ECAs. The only way in which this apparent anomaly can be addressed is by a revision of EU Directive 1999/32/EC, which covers the sulphur content of liquid fuels derived from petroleum, including those used by seagoing ships.

“Absent any amendment of the EU directive, owners, operators and their bunker suppliers will need to exercise extreme vigilance in ensuring that they do not fall foul of the regulations come July of next year, or simply play safe by opting to use a maximum 1.00 per cent sulphur fuel at all times.”

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top


 Related Links