Mon 6 Jul 2009 07:51

Swire Shipping denies bunker spill payment claims


Operator says it wishes to achieve a 'mutually acceptable solution' regarding a cleanup payment.



Swire Shipping, the operator of the Pacific Adventurer, has rejected assertions that it is not prepared to cover the cost of a 270-tonne bunker spill off Australia's Moreton Island [pictured], which resulted from the vessel's loss of containers during Cyclone Hamish.

The company said that it is in discussions with the State and Federal Transport Ministers and has written to Premier Anna Bligh saying that it wishes to achieve a "mutually acceptable solution" in line with its commitment to the people of Queensland.

"From the beginning, the company has always promised to meet its full responsibilities under Australian law for the accident clean-up.

"The company has not stated it would cover all costs. All costs are still unknown and there is a limit to the amount of claims the company and its insurers can accept," Swire Shipping said in a statement.

According to Queensland state Premier Anna Bligh, lawyers for Swire Shipping had informed the state government that the company only intends to pay the $US17 million required under international maritime conventions, leaving taxpayers to pay the rest of the estimated $US27 million despite previous assurances that it would pay above the cap.

"As the Queensland Government is aware, Australia is a party to the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (the LLMC Convention) which limits the liability of a ship-owner for third party claims. In the case of the Pacific Adventurer, the Convention limits this liability to the equivalent of approximately A$14.5 million. The Federal Government Minister for Transport, the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, has reaffirmed the applicability of this limit since the Pacific Adventurer incident," Swire Shipping said.

The company added that the ship's insurer has already provided financial security to the Government by a letter of undertaking for up to A$20 million.

In addition, Swire Shipping said that immediately following the bunker spill it had provided $2 million of assistance with the clean-up. The company added that its oil pollution experts had flown from the Middle East and it had imported specialist equipment which was donated to the Government.

"The reason for the LLMC Convention is to place an upper limit on ship-owners' potential liability for a fuel oil spill. If ship-owners faced unlimited liability for such spills, the additional cost of insurance would result in a significant increase in freight rates, which would have a negative impact on international trade. Australian exports and imports would have to carry this additional cost," Swire Shipping said.

"Any decision by Swire Shipping to offer compensation that is significantly above the limit determined by the LLMC Convention would risk becoming a precedent in international law. As a result, insurance premiums and freight rates could rise significantly.

"Swire Shipping wishes to express its sincere regret to the people of Queensland for the oil spill. The company is committed to resolving the matter in a fair and equitable manner and remains ready to discuss it with the Premier of Queensland," the company added.

Opening of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 83rd Session, April 7, 2025. IMO approves pricing mechanism based on GHG intensity thresholds  

Charges to be levied on ships that do not meet yearly GHG fuel intensity reduction targets.

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.

Terminal Aquaviário de Rio Grande (TERIG), operated by Transpetro. Petrobras secures ISCC EU RED certification for B24 biofuel blend at Rio Grande  

Blend consisting of 24% FAME is said to have been rigorously tested to meet international standards.

Avenir LNG logo on sea background. Stolt-Nielsen to fully control Avenir LNG with acquisition  

Share purchase agreement to buy all shares from Golar LNG and Aequitas.

Seaspan Energy's 7,600 cbm LNG bunkering vessel, s1067, built by Nantong CIMC Sinopacific Offshore & Engineering Co., Ltd. Bureau Veritas supports launch of CIMC SOE's LNG bunkering vessel  

Handover of Seaspan Energy's cutting-edge 7,600-cbm vessel completed.


↑  Back to Top