Thu 11 May 2017 12:45

Maersk Line posts Q1 loss as bunker costs jump 95% yoy


Shipping giant spent $381 million more on bunkers in Q1 compared to last year.



Maersk Line reports that it spent $381 million more on bunker fuel in the first quarter of 2017 compared to last year, which contributed towards the firm recording a net loss for the period.

The Danish shipping giant's total spend on marine fuels jumped 95 percent to $782 million, up from $401 million during the corresponding three-month period in 2016.

The average price spent on bunkers by Maersk Line between January and March was $320 per tonne - a rise of $142, or 79.8 percent, on the $178-per-tonne figure recorded the previous year.

Results

In its key results for the first quarter, Maersk Line recorded a net loss of $66 million after tax, compared to the net profit of $37 million achieved last year.

Revenue during the period rose by $519 million, or 10.4 percent, to $5,493 million year-on-year, whilst the average freight rate increased by 4.4 percent; however, this was not sufficient to offset the 79.8 percent increase in the average bunker price, Maersk Line said.

Maersk Line noted that its bunker efficiency improved by 1.8 percent to 940 kg/FFE, compared to 957 kg/FFE the previous year. Unit cost at fixed bunker price increased by 3.5 percent compared to Q4 2016.

As regards overall group performance, A.P. Moller - Maersk Group achieved a net profit increase of $29 million, or 12.9 percent, to $253 million for the first quarter, up from $224 million the previous year.

Guidance for 2017

In its guidance for 2017, A.P. Moller - Maersk said that a $10-per-barrel change in the price of crude oil would result in the group's underlying result varying by $0.2 billion.

A $100 change in the price of bunker fuel would lead to the underlying result varying by $0.3 billion, A.P. Moller - Maersk noted.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top