Wed 17 Sep 2008 15:24

WTSA selects Bunker Index


Bunker Index price data used for new surcharge formula calculations.



After a comprehensive internal review that included feedback from customers, The Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (WTSA) has revisited, and made changes in how it calculates guideline bunker fuel surcharges in the U.S.-Asia freight market.

In a statement, WTSA said "Member shipping lines have adopted a simpler, more transparent formula for dry cargo which eliminates a number of variables that made the formula more complex; distinguishes between bunker fuel-related costs for West Coast port-to-port and East Coast all-water services; and narrows the formula tiers – the threshold fuel prices that trigger surcharge increases and the amount of those increases – to ease the impacts of monthly adjustments".

WTSA member shipping lines intend to implement the new formula effective October 1, 2008 in their tariffs and in service contracts going forward, for dry cargo moving from all U.S. origin locations to all Asian destinations. A separate guideline covering refrigerated cargo is expected to be finalized and announced shortly, to take effect on November 1, 2008.

“The new formula is a significant departure from how WTSA has calculated its bunker surcharge guideline in the past,” said WTSA executive administrator Brian M. Conrad.

“Container lines face an urgent need to recover fuel costs that have more than doubled in 18 months. In turn, customers are being asked to absorb a sizeable increase in their freight costs, and carriers recognize that this will require an easily justifiable, transparent process.”

WTSA says it began the process of modifying its surcharge formula by eliminating unwieldy steps that were part of an effort to arrive at a complete “average of averages” that reflects the cost impacts of rising fuel prices on multiple, different container services. Specifically, the new bunker surcharge formula which now:

*Tracks a single grade of fuel, IFO 380, which accounts for a large percentage of fuel-related costs.

* Eliminates the weighted average of weekly prices at 11 load ports.

* Uses a straight average of Hong Kong and Los Angeles prices for the West Coast; and Hong Kong and New York prices for the East Coast surcharge.

* Uses price data for the three ports published on Bunker Index.

A second set of changes involves straightforward components for constructing fuel cost impacts from changes in fuel prices. These include:

* Vessel effective capacity.
* Westbound allocation of deadweight capacity after eastbound empty repositions.
* Maximum capacity for loaded containers before reaching a ship’s weight limit.
* Daily fuel consumption.
* One-way steaming time (excluding time in port).
WTSA says averages for the above components vary for West Coast and East Coast services, but are constant for each.

A simple calculation adjusts effective capacity to allow for the deadweight impact of empty returns; multiplies the fuel price (per ton) by consumption (tons per day), then by transit time (steaming days); and finally dividing by the maximum number of loaded containers by weight for the ship’s effective capacity, to produce an average fuel cost per sailing per 40-foot container (FEU).

Under the new formula, WTSA says the weighted average fuel price of $689.60 per metric ton developed under the current formula for the month of August 2008, translates into a bunker fuel surcharge of $767 per 40-foot container (FEU) from the West Coast, and $1,515 per FEU from the East Coast. Going forward WTSA says the monthly-adjusted totals will be fine-tuned further, developing distinct weekly average price information for each coast.

With separate calculations for West Coast and East Coast services – an approach said to be favoured by many shippers in discussions with WTSA – Conrad said it is inevitable that many customers will see differences in their surcharges under the new formula versus the old one.

“The carriers’ focus was to make the formula as simple and transparent as possible, and to reflect as accurately as possible the fuel costs passed through depending on routing,” he explained. “We believe that, under the new formula, those objectives have been met.”

WTSA is in the process of preparing a fact sheet that it will post on its web site shortly, detailing the new bunker surcharge formula, with a matrix that translates current average fuel prices to per container surcharge levels.

WTSA is a voluntary discussion and research forum of 10 major ocean and intermodal container shipping lines serving the trade from ports and inland points in the U.S. to destinations throughout Asia.

WTSA members include: APL, Ltd., COSCO Container Lines, Ltd., Evergreen Line, Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., Hapag Lloyd AG, Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (K Line), Nippon Yusen Kaisha (N.Y.K. Line), Orient Overseas Container Line Inc(OOCL) and Yangming Marine Transport Corp.

Stephen Robinson, pictured on his appointment as Head of Bunker Strategy and Procurement at Tankers International. Stephen Robinson heads up bunker desk at Tankers International  

Former Bomin and Cockett MD appointed Head of Bunker Strategy and Procurement.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.


↑  Back to Top


 Related Links