Wed 17 Sep 2008 15:24

WTSA selects Bunker Index


Bunker Index price data used for new surcharge formula calculations.



After a comprehensive internal review that included feedback from customers, The Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (WTSA) has revisited, and made changes in how it calculates guideline bunker fuel surcharges in the U.S.-Asia freight market.

In a statement, WTSA said "Member shipping lines have adopted a simpler, more transparent formula for dry cargo which eliminates a number of variables that made the formula more complex; distinguishes between bunker fuel-related costs for West Coast port-to-port and East Coast all-water services; and narrows the formula tiers – the threshold fuel prices that trigger surcharge increases and the amount of those increases – to ease the impacts of monthly adjustments".

WTSA member shipping lines intend to implement the new formula effective October 1, 2008 in their tariffs and in service contracts going forward, for dry cargo moving from all U.S. origin locations to all Asian destinations. A separate guideline covering refrigerated cargo is expected to be finalized and announced shortly, to take effect on November 1, 2008.

“The new formula is a significant departure from how WTSA has calculated its bunker surcharge guideline in the past,” said WTSA executive administrator Brian M. Conrad.

“Container lines face an urgent need to recover fuel costs that have more than doubled in 18 months. In turn, customers are being asked to absorb a sizeable increase in their freight costs, and carriers recognize that this will require an easily justifiable, transparent process.”

WTSA says it began the process of modifying its surcharge formula by eliminating unwieldy steps that were part of an effort to arrive at a complete “average of averages” that reflects the cost impacts of rising fuel prices on multiple, different container services. Specifically, the new bunker surcharge formula which now:

*Tracks a single grade of fuel, IFO 380, which accounts for a large percentage of fuel-related costs.

* Eliminates the weighted average of weekly prices at 11 load ports.

* Uses a straight average of Hong Kong and Los Angeles prices for the West Coast; and Hong Kong and New York prices for the East Coast surcharge.

* Uses price data for the three ports published on Bunker Index.

A second set of changes involves straightforward components for constructing fuel cost impacts from changes in fuel prices. These include:

* Vessel effective capacity.
* Westbound allocation of deadweight capacity after eastbound empty repositions.
* Maximum capacity for loaded containers before reaching a ship’s weight limit.
* Daily fuel consumption.
* One-way steaming time (excluding time in port).
WTSA says averages for the above components vary for West Coast and East Coast services, but are constant for each.

A simple calculation adjusts effective capacity to allow for the deadweight impact of empty returns; multiplies the fuel price (per ton) by consumption (tons per day), then by transit time (steaming days); and finally dividing by the maximum number of loaded containers by weight for the ship’s effective capacity, to produce an average fuel cost per sailing per 40-foot container (FEU).

Under the new formula, WTSA says the weighted average fuel price of $689.60 per metric ton developed under the current formula for the month of August 2008, translates into a bunker fuel surcharge of $767 per 40-foot container (FEU) from the West Coast, and $1,515 per FEU from the East Coast. Going forward WTSA says the monthly-adjusted totals will be fine-tuned further, developing distinct weekly average price information for each coast.

With separate calculations for West Coast and East Coast services – an approach said to be favoured by many shippers in discussions with WTSA – Conrad said it is inevitable that many customers will see differences in their surcharges under the new formula versus the old one.

“The carriers’ focus was to make the formula as simple and transparent as possible, and to reflect as accurately as possible the fuel costs passed through depending on routing,” he explained. “We believe that, under the new formula, those objectives have been met.”

WTSA is in the process of preparing a fact sheet that it will post on its web site shortly, detailing the new bunker surcharge formula, with a matrix that translates current average fuel prices to per container surcharge levels.

WTSA is a voluntary discussion and research forum of 10 major ocean and intermodal container shipping lines serving the trade from ports and inland points in the U.S. to destinations throughout Asia.

WTSA members include: APL, Ltd., COSCO Container Lines, Ltd., Evergreen Line, Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., Hapag Lloyd AG, Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (K Line), Nippon Yusen Kaisha (N.Y.K. Line), Orient Overseas Container Line Inc(OOCL) and Yangming Marine Transport Corp.

Opening of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 83rd Session, April 7, 2025. IMO approves pricing mechanism based on GHG intensity thresholds  

Charges to be levied on ships that do not meet yearly GHG fuel intensity reduction targets.

Preemraff Göteborg, Preem's wholly owned refinery in Gothenburg, Sweden. VARO Energy expands renewable portfolio with Preem acquisition  

All-cash transaction expected to complete in the latter half of 2025.

Pictured: Biofuel is supplied to NYK Line's Noshiro Maru. The vessel tested biofuel for Tohoku Electric Power in a landmark first for Japan. NYK trials biofuel in milestone coal carrier test  

Vessel is used to test biofuel for domestic utility company.

Pictured (from left): H-Line Shipping CEO Seo Myungdeuk and HJSC CEO Yoo Sang-cheol at the contract signing ceremony for the construction of an 18,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel. H-Line Shipping orders LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel with 18,000-cbm capacity to run on both LNG and MDO.

Stanley George, VPS Group Technical and Science Manager, VPS. How to engineer and manage green shipping fuels | Stanley George, VPS  

Effective management strategies and insights for evolving fuel use.

Sweden flag with water in background. Swedish government bans scrubber wastewater discharges  

Discharges from open-loop scrubbers to be prohibited in Swedish waters from July 2025.

The ME-LGIA test engine at MAN's Research Centre Copenhagen. MAN Energy Solutions achieves 100% load milestone for ammonia engine  

Latest tests validate fuel injection system throughout the entire load curve.

Terminal Aquaviário de Rio Grande (TERIG), operated by Transpetro. Petrobras secures ISCC EU RED certification for B24 biofuel blend at Rio Grande  

Blend consisting of 24% FAME is said to have been rigorously tested to meet international standards.

Avenir LNG logo on sea background. Stolt-Nielsen to fully control Avenir LNG with acquisition  

Share purchase agreement to buy all shares from Golar LNG and Aequitas.

Seaspan Energy's 7,600 cbm LNG bunkering vessel, s1067, built by Nantong CIMC Sinopacific Offshore & Engineering Co., Ltd. Bureau Veritas supports launch of CIMC SOE's LNG bunkering vessel  

Handover of Seaspan Energy's cutting-edge 7,600-cbm vessel completed.


↑  Back to Top


 Related Links