Wed 14 May 2008 12:35

Singapore firm pays for US bunker spill


Shipping company is fined $27,500 for oil spill in Seattle in 2007.



Singapore-based OSM Ship Management has paid a $27,500 fine for an oil spill in Seattle's Eliott Bay last year, according to the Washington State Department of Ecology.

The bulk carrier Songa Hua spilled an estimated 93 gallons of intermediate fuel oil on February 28th 2007. The ship was anchored off Smith Cove, about a half-mile south of the Port of Seattle’s Pier 91.

An overflow occurred while the Songa Hua was loading fuel from a barge. Ecology investigators later determined that ship’s crew caused the spill by:

* Failing to follow established procedures to monitor the fueling operation.
* Making faulty repairs to a fuel tank valve, without proper oversight.
* Failing to give special attention to the valve, because it was being used for the first time since its repair.

The Department of Ecology also said the crew failed to immediately report the spill as required by state law.

“The best oil-spill defense is prevention,” said Dale Jensen, who manages Ecology’s spill prevention, preparedness and response programme. “Washington State requires detailed planning before – and attentive care during – each marine fuel transfer. Crews have to meet those requirements every time they transfer fuel over water.”

The spill caused areas of oil sheen within approximately 90 acres of northern Elliott Bay. The sheen coated bulkhead rocks at Elliott Bay Marina and pilings under Pier 91. Cleanup took six days to complete.

OSM bore all cleanup contractor costs. The company last year also reimbursed the state $11,139 for response and investigation costs, and paid a $1,855 Natural Resources Damage Assessment. The Department of Ecology deposited the penalty and assessment payments into accounts that fund the department’s chartered Neah Bay emergency response tug.

Chart showing percentage of off-spec and on-spec samples by fuel type, according to VPS. Is your vessel fully protected from the dangers of poor-quality fuel? | Steve Bee, VPS  

Commercial Director highlights issues linked to purchasing fuel and testing quality against old marine fuel standards.

Ships at the Tecon container terminal at the Port of Suape, Brazil. GDE Marine targets Suape LSMGO by year-end  

Expansion plan revealed following '100% incident-free' first month of VLSFO deliveries.

Hercules Tanker Management and Hyundai Mipo Dockyard sign bunker vessel agreement Peninsula CEO seals deal to build LNG bunker vessel  

Agreement signed through shipping company Hercules Tanker Management.

Illustration of Kotug tugboat and the logos of Auramarine and Sanmar Shipyards. Auramarine supply system chosen for landmark methanol-fuelled tugs  

Vessels to enter into service in mid-2025.

A Maersk vessel, pictured from above. Rise in bunker costs hurts Maersk profit  

Shipper blames reroutings via Cape of Good Hope and fuel price increase.

Claus Bulch Klausen, CEO of Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering posts profit rise in 2023-24  

EBT climbs to $46.8m, whilst revenue dips from previous year's all-time high.

Chart showing percentage of fuel samples by ISO 8217 version, according to VPS. ISO 8217:2024 'a major step forward' | Steve Bee, VPS  

Revision of international marine fuel standard has addressed a number of the requirements associated with newer fuels, says Group Commercial Director.

Carsten Ladekjær, CEO of Glander International Bunkering. EBT down 45.8% for Glander International Bunkering  

CFO lauds 'resilience' as firm highlights decarbonization achievements over past year.

Anders Grønborg, CEO of KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect posts 59% drop in pre-tax profit  

Diminished earnings and revenue as sales volume rises by 1m tonnes.

Verde Marine Homepage Delta Energy's ARA team shifts to newly launched Verde Marine  

Physical supplier offering delivery of marine gasoil in the ARA region.


↑  Back to Top


 Related Links