BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry



« News Home
:: Monthly Archive

News Topics
:: Air Pollution
:: Agreements & M&A's
:: Alternative Fuels
:: BunkerBlog
:: Cargoes & Storage
:: Company News
:: Efficiency, Costs & Charges
:: Environment
:: Events
:: Financial
:: Fuel Quality & Testing
:: Lubes & Additives
:: Oil Spills
:: People
:: Port News
:: Projects
:: Regulation, Legal
:: Services, Products,Technology
:: Statistics & Research
:: Vessels

Regional Archive
:: Americas
:: Asia/Oceania
:: Europe
:: M.East/Africa


BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry
Home » News



Maersk Line spent $1.2bn more on bunkers in 2017; average price was highest since 2014

Boxship giant's annual spend jumped 57.1% to $3.2bn last year.



Image credit:


Updated on 14 Feb 2018 10:25 GMT

Maersk Line reports that it spent $1.2 billion more on bunker fuel in 2017 compared to the previous year.

The boxship giant's total annual spend on marine fuels rose by 57.1 percent to $3.2 billion last year, up from $2.1 billion in 2016.

The average price spent on bunkers by Maersk Line in 2017 was $320 per tonne - a rise of $97, or 43.5 percent, on the $223-per-tonne figure recorded in 2016. It is the highest annual average price since 2014 and breaks the trend of annual decreases seen over the last few years.

A summary of Maersk Line's average fuel prices since 2012 has been provided below.

Average annual fuel prices ($ per metric tonne)

Year Price($/mt) +/-($) +/-(%)
2017 320 +97 +43.5
2016 223 -92 -29.2
2015 315 -247-44.0
2014 562 -33 -5.5
2013 595 -66 -10.0
2012 661 -- --

Meanwhile, total bunker costs for A.P. Moller - Maersk Group were $3.372 billion in 2017 compared to the previously reported $2.1567 billion in 2016 (though in the latest report the figure appears as $2.023 billion, which is less than the $2.1 billion amount spent by Maersk Line).

Unit cost at fixed and floating bunker price; bunker efficiency

Maersk Line's unit cost at fixed bunker price in 2017 was almost on a par with the previous year at just 0.2 percent higher. The result was said to have been negatively impacted by lower headhaul utilisation as well as lower backhaul volumes as well as the 43 percent increase in the average bunker price.

"Maersk Line must regain its position as the industry cost leader by year-on-year improving unit cost at fixed bunker price," the container vessel operator stressed.

The unit cost at floating bunker, meanwhile, was 4.9 percent higher than in 2016; this was said to be mainly driven by the annual rise in the average bunker price.

Bunker efficiency per loaded FFE declined by 4.7 percent to 953 kg/FFE (910 kg/FFE). Maersk said this was partly due to the increased capacity committed to carrying volumes from the slot purchase agreements which are not counted as loaded volume. Efficiency was also impacted by lower headhaul utilisation, lower backhaul volumes and the June cyber-attack.

Fourth quarter

In the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2017, Maersk Line's bunker costs rose by 34.7 percent to $903 million.

The average fuel price in Q4 was $340 per tonne - an increase of $68, or 25 percent, year-on-year (YoY) and $33, or 10.7 percent, sequentially.

Overall financial results in 2017

In its financial results for the year, Maersk Line (excluding Hamburg Sud) achieved a net profit of $584 million in 2017 compared to a net loss of $376 million the year before, whilst its underlying profit of $521 million was also an improvement on 2016's loss of $384 million. Revenue during the 12-month period rose by 14.9 percent to $23.8 billion.

A.P. Moller - Maersk Group's underlying result swung into profit at $356 million, having posted a loss of $496 million the previous year.

Guidance for 2018

In its guidance for 2018, A.P. Moller - Maersk said a $100 change in the price of bunker fuel would lead to the group's earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) varying by $0.5 billion.






Related Links:

Maersk Line posts $336m profit swing despite spending $218m more on bunkers
Maersk Line posts Q1 loss as bunker costs jump 95% yoy
Maersk pulls out of MSAR fuel trial
Maersk, AkzoNobel in tie-up to slash carbon emissions
Denmark

Latest News:

Cargill to pay for Seanergy's scrubber retrofit
IMO 2020 positive for tanker market: Teekay Tankers
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Torm performs maiden scrubber retrofit; takes delivery of first newbuild with scrubber
Oil slightly higher on renewed output cut talks
Prexit: Another president leaves PetroChina - Singapore's second-biggest bunker supplier
Maersk Ocean ups Q3 profit, spends $0.5bn more on bunkers
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Aegean in court: The lowdown on Wednesday's hearing
Volatility continues as oil prices take a beating
Sulphur remover Genoil gets Pemex supplier certificate
Greek refiner and bunker seller HELPE 'well-positioned' for IMO 2020




Page Links:

Prices
Africa
Asia
Latin America
Middle East
North America
North Europe
South Europe
Index Summary
Price Highlights
Commentaries
Futures
Prices
Antwerp
Busan
Fujairah
Houston
Istanbul
Kaohsiung
Las Palmas
Maracaibo
New Orleans
Piraeus
Rio de Janeiro
Rotterdam
Santos
Singapore
News
Latest News
Blogs
Archive
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
News
Air Pollution
Agreements & M&A's
Alternative Fuels
Cargoes & Storage
Efficiency, Costs & Charges
Environment
Events
Financial
Fuel Quality
Lubes & Additives
Oil Spills
People
Port News
Projects
Regulation/Legal
Services, Products, Technology
Statistics & Research
Vessels
Contact & Terms
Contact Us
Advertise
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Upcoming Events