Mon 8 Dec 2025, 14:55 GMT | Updated: Mon 8 Dec 2025, 17:27 GMT | Steve Bee

From Regulation to Reality: Fuel Assessment Update of the Mediterranean Emission Control Area | Steve Bee, VPS


VPS: From Regulation to Reality.
Redesigned version of VPS's header for the article titled 'From Regulation to Reality: Fuel Assessment Update of the Mediterranean Emission Control Area.' Image credit: VPS; Bunker Index

By the end of October 2025, six months had passed since the implementation of the Mediterranean Emission Control Area (ECA). This article will set out to review what’s changed in terms of the fuel mix and fuel quality across the region between 1 November 2024 and 31 October 2025.

Pre-Mediterranean ECA

The six months leading up to the implementation of the Mediterranean ECA (1 November to 30 April 2025), VPS tested marine fuels representing 1,610,852 mt, bunkered in the Top 10 Mediterranean ports. This consisted of 53% VLSFO, 28% HSFO, 16% MGO, 2% ULSFO and 1% biofuels. These Top 10 Mediterranean ports during the six months leading up to the ECA coming into force provided approximately 90% of the total fuel tested by VPS from the whole region. The breakdown by port and fuel type in mt was as follows:

Figure 1: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (Nov '24 to Apr '25).
Figure 1: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (Nov '24 to Apr '25). Image credit: VPS

Table 1: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (Nov '24 to Apr '25).
Table 1: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (Nov '24 to Apr '25). Image credit: VPS

Over the six month period pre-ECA (Nov '24 to Apr '25), 5.5%, by volume, of all fuels bunkered across the Top 10 Mediterranean ports, were off-specification. However, by fuel type over that time period, the following off-specification rates were observed:

  • VLSFO (6%)
  • HSFO (6%)
  • MGO (3%)
  • ULSFO (2%)
  • Biofuels (0%)

In terms of the off-specification parameters by fuel type pre-ECA, these were mainly the following:

  • VLSFO – Viscosity, Cat-fines
  • HSFO – Viscosity, Density, Water
  • MGO – Flash Point
  • ULFSO – Pour Point

Post-Mediterranean ECA

From the implementation of the Mediterranean ECA on 1 May until 31 October 2025, VPS tested marine fuels representing 1,888,799 mt from the Top 10 Mediterranean ports. This consisted of 30% VLSFO, 29% HSFO, 30% MGO, 8% ULSFO and 4% biofuels.

Looking at the Top 10 Mediterranean ports since the start of the ECA and up to 31 October, these ports have supplied approximately 90% of the total fuel tested by VPS, which is a similar percentage to the six-month period pre ECA.

The breakdown by port and fuel type in mt is as follows:

Figure 2: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (May '25 to Oct '25).
Figure 2: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (May '25 to Oct '25). Image credit: VPS

Table 2: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (May '25 to Oct '25).
Table 2: Top 10 Mediterranean ports: bunkered fuel tonnage by type (May '25 to Oct '25). Image credit: VPS

Impact of the Mediterranean ECA

The relative percentage volume of VLSFO bunkered in the ECA has decreased significantly since its implementation, whilst HSFO has increased slightly, with MGO, ULSFO and biofuel volumes all dramatically increasing in volumes.

However, looking at the actual volumes post-ECA versus pre-ECA, VLSFO has decreased by -278k mt, whilst HSFO (+89k mt), MGO (+300k mt), ULSFO (+112k mt) and biofuels (+56k mt), have all increased, indicating an increased mix in the use of compliant fuels (<0.1% sulphur) and scrubber usage across the Mediterranean ECA.

Figure 3: Mediterranean bunker fuel volumes by type, pre- and post-ECA.
Figure 3: Mediterranean bunker fuel volumes by type, pre- and post-ECA. Image credit: VPS

The combined off-specification rate for the Top 10 Mediterranean ports, across all fuels since the implementation of the ECA, is 5.1%, which is only slightly lower to the pre-ECA off specification rate of 5.5%. However, by fuel type over that time period, the following off specification rates were observed:

  • VLSFO 5%
  • HSFO 3%
  • MGO 4%
  • ULSFO 20%
  • Biofuels 2%

In terms of the off-specification parameters by fuel type post ECA, these were mainly the following:

  • VLSFO – Sulphur, Cat-fines
  • HSFO – Density
  • MGO – Pour Point, FAME
  • ULFSO – Pour Point, Sulphur, TSP, CCAI, Water, Viscosity
  • Biofuels - FAME

The high level of ULSFO off-specifications, came from 78 bunker stems (29k mt) out of 341 delivered stems (148k mt):

Table 3: ULSFO off-specification parameters (May '25 to Oct '25).
Table 3: ULSFO off-specification parameters (May '25 to Oct '25). Image credit: VPS

Figure 4: Mediterranean off-specification rates by fuel type, pre- and post-ECA.
Figure 4: Mediterranean off-specification rates by fuel type, pre- and post-ECA. Image credit: VPS

Summary

As stated, this article compares bunker volumes and quality, six months pre-ECA versus the first six months post-ECA implementation.

Both before and after ECA implementation, the Top 10 Mediterranean ports provide 90% of all fuel within the region.

From these Top 10 Mediterranean ports, VPS tested marine fuels representing 1.9 million mt from the new ECA region compared with 1.6 million mt in the six months leading up to the ECA implementation, showing an almost 20% increase in fuel supply.

Pre-ECA implementation, the fuel mix in the Mediterranean was 53% VLSFO, 28% HSFO, 16% MGO, 2% ULSFO and 1% biofuels. From 1 May 2025, the mix changed to, 30% VLSFO, 29% HSFO, 30% MGO, 8% ULSFO and 4% biofuels.

So, in terms of actual tonnage, VLSFO decreased by 23%, whilst MGO usage increased by 107%. ULSFO supply increased 4-fold and biofuels increased 5-fold.

Overall off-specification rates for all fuels before ECA implementation was 5.5% and over the first six month since the start of the ECA, the rate was 5.1%. Since the ECA implementation, off specification rates for VLSFO and HSFO have reduced to 5% and 3%, respectively. However, MGO off-specification rates have increased to 4%. But the most worrying off specification rates are for ULSFO which have shown a tenfold increase from 2% to 20% since the start of the ECA, with the main off-specification parameters for ULSFO being pour point, sulphur, TSP, CCAI, water and viscosity.

So in conclusion, as anticipated, the implementation of the Mediterranean ECA on 1 May 2025 has seen a significant change in the Mediterranean fuel mix, with a significant reduction in VLSFO supply and demand, but a major increase in the supply and demand of MGO, ULSFO and biofuels. A 20% increase in HSFO supply would indicate an increase in scrubber-fitted vessels and/or existing scrubber-fitted vessels taking more HSFO fuel.

The wide range of off-specifications across the fuel mix continues to highlight the need for proactive fuel testing to protect the vessel, their crew and the environment. The ultimate outcome being a successful reduction in SOx, NOx, PM and GHG emissions across the Mediterranean Sea.

By Steve Bee, VPS Group Marketing & Strategic Projects Director



Damen ASD Tug 2713 Fuel Flexible (FF) vessel graphic. Damen receives methanol approval for ASD Tug 2713 fuel-flexible design  

Bureau Veritas and Dutch flag state grant approval, enabling construction of methanol-ready tugs.

Sing Fuels hiring graphic. Sing Fuels seeks supply trader for China-focused marine fuel procurement role  

Singapore-based firm recruiting for position involving supplier negotiations and market tracking across Asia.

Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. CHB2061. Zhoushan Changhong begins construction on third 11,400-teu LNG dual-fuel container ship  

CHB2061 is the third vessel in an 18-ship series for Oceanroutes, designed to exceed EEDI Phase III standards.

Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. CHB2050. Construction begins on fourth 19,000-teu LNG dual-fuel container ship for MSC  

Vessel is said to be the largest LNG dual-fuel container ship under construction in Zhejiang Province.

325,000-dwt Newcastlemax vessel render. WinGD secures first ethanol-fuelled engine orders for ocean-going vessels  

Swiss power firm to supply dual-fuel engines for two ore carriers operating under Vale charter.

Grimaldi ro-ro passenger vessel render. Auramarine to supply methanol fuel systems for six Grimaldi Group ro-pax vessels  

Finnish firm wins contract for methanol systems on Mediterranean vessels scheduled for delivery in 2028–2030.

Everllence office building. Everllence reports more than 160 orders for Mk10.7 two-stroke engine platform  

Modular engine design allows shipowners to switch between conventional and alternative fuels.

Rendering of an electric tug. Berg Propulsion to supply electric propulsion for Türkiye’s most powerful tugs  

Swedish firm contracted for four diesel-electric firefighting tugs with over 130-tonne bollard pull capacity.

Hyke F-15 Shuttle vessel render. Hyke partners with Pascal Technologies for electric ferry powertrain in Norway  

Pascal Technologies to supply integrated powertrain platform for Hyke F-15 Shuttle ordered by Cityboat.

VPS logo. The importance of fast turnaround times for bunker fuel analysis in today’s market | Thomas Schmidt, VPS  

Rapid and reliable fuel quality intelligence is critical to protecting vessels, machinery, operations and commercial performance.