This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Suezmax crude oil tanker render. Guangzhou Shipyard secures Suezmax order, delivers vessels ahead of schedule  

China State Shipbuilding subsidiary reports nine vessel deliveries in the first quarter of 2026.

Clean ammonia project pipeline chart as of March 2026. Renewable ammonia pipeline grows despite Norway project freeze  

GENA Solutions tracks 325 projects totalling 146 MMT of capacity by 2034 despite execution challenges.

Antwerpen and Arlon naming ceremony. Exmar names world’s first ocean-going ammonia dual-fuel gas carriers in South Korea  

Two 46,000-cbm vessels can reduce CO₂ emissions by up to 90% during navigation.

Fujian province map with highlighted locations. Gulf Marine expands bonded lubricant supply network in China’s Fujian province  

Company adds supply points in Putian, Ningde and Fuqing, covering 20 terminals across the region.

Excelerate Acadia naming ceremony. Bureau Veritas classifies Excelerate Energy’s new 170,000-cbm FSRU Excelerate Acadia  

Vessel built by HD Hyundai Heavy Industries features dual-fuel engines and proprietary regasification system.

Osprey Energy logo. Osprey Energy seeks junior bunker trader to support Cebu trading activities from Netherlands  

Dutch marine fuel supplier targets Cebu region expansion through new training programme for Filipino candidates.

EUA prices dropping graphic. KPI OceanConnect highlights falling EUA prices as opportunity for shipowners to lock in compliance costs  

Marine fuel firm says timing carbon allowance purchases can reduce costs as EU emissions scope expands.

RINA employee in control room. RINA partners with Hanwha Group on battery-hybrid propulsion for ro-ro ferries  

Classification society to provide regulatory compliance verification for hybrid battery systems on newbuilds and retrofits.

Amadeus Titanium vessel. HGK Shipping’s Amadeus Titanium fitted with wind assistance system  

Coastal vessel equipped with VentoFoils at Dutch port to reduce fuel consumption on Covestro routes.

Sebastian Weder, Bunker One. Bunker One expands physical supply operations to Tallinn and Finland  

Marine fuel supplier extends Baltic Sea coverage with new operational presence in Estonia and Finland.


↑  Back to Top