This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Jurgen Gerdes, WinGD. WinGD signs global service agreement for TMS Cardiff Gas LNG carrier newbuilds  

WinGD will support six dual-fuel engines on three new LNG carriers for the Athens-based operator throughout their operational lives.

Yangze LNG 01 vessel. Yangzijiang Xinfu delivers first 175,000-cbm LNG carrier built by Chinese private shipyard  

Vessel features two dual-fuel MAN B&W 5G70ME-C10.5-GA-EGR engines fitted with cryogenic units.

Kaguya 200th ship-to-ship (STS) LNG bunkering operation. LNG bunkering vessel Kaguya completes 200th ship-to-ship operation in Japan  

K Line’s joint venture vessel reaches milestone in Mikawa Bay.

MFM Nicole vessel. Synergy Marine adds dual-fuel LPG carrier to managed fleet  

MFM Nicole joins Synergy’s gas carrier portfolio as owners weigh fuel choices ahead of MEPC 85 negotiations.

CMA CGM Notre Dame vessel. DSV to use CMA CGM’s ACT+ solution to slash shipping emissions  

Danish firm targets 12,000-tonne reduction in CO₂ emissions over two years through the use of UCOME-based biofuels.

Peninsula 2026 graduate cohort. Peninsula welcomes 2026 graduate cohort across global bunkering network  

Bunker firm brings new graduates into roles spanning Houston, Singapore, Gibraltar, Monaco and Las Palmas.

Mathias Krogsgard, Malik Supply. Malik Supply appoints Mathias Krogsgård as bunker trader  

Danish bunker firm adds trader with export and technology background to growing team.

Jeroen De Vos, Peninsula. Biofuel adoption in shipping shifts from debate to delivery, says Peninsula's Jeroen de Vos  

Marine biofuels have moved from pilot projects to routine fuel strategy, argues IBIA vice-chair.

KEPCO E&C and KR signing. KEPCO E&C and Korean Register of Shipping to collaborate on marine SMR development  

Korean firms to develop technical standards and certification pathways for the BANDI offshore small modular reactor.

Ship-to-ship (STS) LNG bunkering operation at the Port of Sagunto. Peninsula completes first LNG bunkering operation at Sagunto  

Levante LNG bunkering vessel supplies K Line car carrier in landmark delivery.


↑  Back to Top