This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Capital's LNG-powered vessel. Chinese shipbuilder delivers 155,500-dwt LNG dual-fuel crude oil tanker  

Vessel handed over to Capital Ship Management Corp in China.

Glovis Lighthouse vessel. Seaspan takes delivery of first 10,800-ceu dual-fuel LNG car carrier  

Glovis Lighthouse enters service as one of a handful of vessels globally to exceed 10,000 CEU capacity.

Port of Rotterdam, Maersk, Core Power and Lloyd's Register logos. Rotterdam study maps pathway for nuclear-powered commercial ship port calls  

A joint study by Lloyd's Register, the Port of Rotterdam, Core Power and Maersk examines the feasibility of nuclear vessel port calls.

Hakata waterfront. Kinkai Yusen conducts first biofuel demonstration on domestic ro-ro vessel at Hakata Port  

Japanese shipping company to trial B24 biofuel blend aboard the vessel Nanotsu on 16 June.

Norwegian Energy Trading (NET) AS logo. Norwegian Energy Trading renews ISCC certification for biofuel trading  

Norwegian bunker trader says renewal reflects growing biofuel volumes and commitment to verifiable sustainability standards.

Ivy Cove vessel. Jiangnan delivers VLAC with LPG dual-fuel main engine  

Vessel is claimed to be the world’s first 93,000 cbm very large ammonia carrier.

BIMCO logo. BIMCO adopts biofuel clause for time charter parties  

Shipping body has introduced a new contractual clause to govern the use of biofuels under time charter agreements.

Prince Madog hydrogen fuel cell retrofit receives LR certification. UK research vessel Prince Madog wins LR certification for hydrogen fuel cell retrofit  

Lloyd’s Register certifies what is claimed to be the first sea-going, manned hydrogen retrofit of its kind.

World Fuel logo. World Fuel seeks marine lube operations and sales executive in Greece  

US firm is recruiting for a commercial role focused on marine lubricants, based out of its Glyfada office.

ECSA Parliamentary Breakfast event. European Shipowners calls for fuel supplier mandates and ETS revenue investment ahead of policy revision  

Industry body urges EU policymakers to redirect carbon revenues into clean marine fuel production.


↑  Back to Top