This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


World Kinect Corporation logo. World Kinect marine segment posts record quarterly gross profit amid bunker price volatility  

Marine division delivers its best-ever quarterly result as the conflict in the Middle East drives bunker price swings.

Explora III vessel. Explora Journeys takes delivery of first LNG-powered ship in its fleet  

Explora III, delivered by Fincantieri in Genoa, marks the brand’s first LNG-fuelled vessel.

Patrick Ryan, Keyyong Hong and Jinyoung Cho. ABS grants approval in principle for nuclear-powered 15,000-teu containership concept  

The concept design, developed with two Korean research institutes, features a marine molten salt reactor.

Tsuneishi logo. T-SOL delivers first Japan-built methanol fuel supply system  

The system, which received ClassNK approval in principle in 2024, will be installed on a Kamsarmax bulk carrier.

Port of Rotterdam. Rotterdam records 0.4% rise in total throughput for H1 2026  

LNG throughput up 1.7% to 6.4m tonnes, with exports increase attributed partly to greater use of LNG as a marine fuel.

Steel-cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. S1151. Construction begins on LNG bunkering vessel for Shell  

Ceremony held for first of two 18,900-cbm vessels being built for Purus Marine.

Singapore skyline. Monjasa seeks supply trader in Singapore  

Role focused on developing and maintaining supplier relationships for the firm's back-to-back operations.

Panama City skyline. Monjasa hiring trader for Panama physical trading team  

Bunker firm looking for candidates with at least two years' experience in sales, trading, shipping, logistics, or similar commercial role.

CIMC SOE building. CIMC SOE and Sinopec Clean Energy sign contract for 12,000-cbm LNG bunkering vessel  

Vessel is scheduled for delivery in 2028 and will serve China’s coastal LNG bunkering network.

S-Oil B30 VLSFO supply launch. S-Oil begins supplying B30 VLSFO from Ulsan  

South Korean refiner S-Oil enters the bio-bunkering market with a vertically integrated Ulsan supply chain.


↑  Back to Top