This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Uni-Fuels Logo. Uni-Fuels appoints general manager for new Houston operation  

Experienced professional Robert Love aiming to expand the company’s presence in the United States.

Two people shaking hands with 'Join our team' text overlay. Sing Fuels hiring junior supply trader for Singapore operations  

Role aimed at candidates with one to two years of experience in marine fuels or the wider maritime industry.

Simaisma vessel. Exmar takes delivery of LNG carrier to serve the bunkering market  

Vessel to be convered into a floating transshipment unit for specialised LNG bunkering vessels to load fuel.

Svitzer Nobbys vessel render. Svitzer signs contract with India’s SDHI for four biofuel-ready TRAnsverse tugs  

Four 32-metre TRAnsverse 3200 tugs ordered from Gujarat-based shipbuilder.

Petrobras logo. Petrobras launches barge supply operations at the Port of Suape  

Supplier has begun VLSFO and LSMGO barge deliveries at the Brazilian port following receipt of final operational licences.

Forty-Two G vessel. Hagland Shipping takes B100-capable Damen CF 3850 on time charter from Reederei Gerdes  

Norwegian dry bulk operator adds short-sea vessel with the ability to operate on B100 biodiesel.

MSC Stella M X naming and delivery ceremony. Chinese shipyard delivers LNG dual-fuel container ship to MSC 301 days ahead of schedule  

Zhoushan Changhong sets new early-delivery record for its series of LNG dual-fuel boxships.

Valiant Lady connected to the shore power system. Portsmouth International Port makes first commercial shore power connection with cruise ship  

Virgin Voyages’ Valiant Lady plugs into Portsmouth International Port’s shore power system, with two ships connected simultaneously.

Philippos Ioulianou, EmissionLink. EmissionLink calls for fairer EU ETS expansion and greater reinvestment in maritime decarbonisation  

Emissions compliance specialist warns that broader coverage alone will not deliver practical decarbonisation.

Peninsula and Evos logo. Peninsula and Evos sign MoU to develop biofuel storage at Algeciras terminal  

Partnership aims to develop up to 60,000 cbm of dedicated biofuel storage capacity at the Strait of Gibraltar.


↑  Back to Top