This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Chimbusco and Shenergy green methanol agreement signing. 'China’s largest single-order green methanol procurement deal' announced  

Chimbusco and Shenergy seal agreement for 6,000 tonnes of methanol.

Moriond vessel. Exmar takes delivery of third dual-fuel LPG midsize gas carrier in newbuild programme  

Belgian shipping group Exmar takes delivery of the 41,000-cbm LPG carrier Moriond.

Hafnia logo. Hafnia Pools reaches 24 partners and 170 vessels as FuelEU compliance met through pooling mechanism  

Hafnia’s tanker pool platform adds five vessels in Q1 2026 amid volatile market conditions.

Avenir Ascension and Visby ship-to-ship (STS) bio-LNG bunkering operation. St1 Biokraft supplies liquefied biogas to Destination Gotland for summer ferry operations  

Nordic biomethane company makes its first liquefied biogas delivery to Swedish ferry operator.

Star Norge vessel. G2 Ocean launches emission reduction certificates for supply chain decarbonisation  

New certificates allow cargo owners to offset Scope 3 transport emissions via biofuel use.

World Fuel logo. World Fuel’s marine gross profit surges 86% as bunker price volatility drives Q1 results  

Higher bunker prices and volatility propel World Fuel to a strong first quarter, prompting upgraded full-year guidance.

Green Pearl and Lapis Ace ship-to-ship (STS) bio-LNG bunkering operation. Axpo completes first ship-to-ship bio-LNG bunkering at Barcelona  

Swiss energy company supplies bio-LNG to MOL's car carrier Lapis Ace at Spanish port.

Dimitris Mertikas, Island Oil. Island Oil appoints Dimitris Mertikas as head of international trading in Dubai  

Bunker firm says hire will strengthen its trading capabilities and knowledge of the Middle Eastern and Greek markets.

International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) logo. LNG and biofuels seen as most viable near-term options, ICS Barometer finds  

Geopolitical instability emerges as shipping’s defining risk in ICS report.

Changhong International Shipyard aerial view. Zhoushan ship exports nearly double in five months amid decarbonisation push  

China's Zhoushan reports 93.7% surge in ship exports driven by rising demand for more advanced and environmentally friendly vessels.


↑  Back to Top