This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Atticus vessel. Global Fuel Supply acquires first bunker tanker  

Company transitions from chartering vessels to ship ownership with asset to be renamed MV Blue Alliance.

ABB Generations 2025 publication on smartphone. ABB publishes 2025 maritime insights on decarbonization and digitalization  

Technology firm compiles annual articles exploring energy efficiency, automation, and alternative fuels for the shipping industry.

ClassNK AiP handover ceremony for bulk carrier design. ClassNK grants approval for multi-fuel ready bulk carrier design by Oshima Shipbuilding  

Vessel design accommodates future conversion to ammonia, methanol, or LNG with carbon capture capability.

The Arctic and black carbon graphic. Four countries propose Arctic fuel measure to cut black carbon from shipping  

Proposal to IMO's PPR 13 meeting aims to establish fuel regulations under MARPOL Annex VI.

T&E chart 1. Spain, Norway and Denmark lead Europe's green shipping fuel production, study finds  

Regulatory uncertainty prevents most e-fuel projects from progressing beyond the planning stage, says analysis.

Charles Simon Edwin, Dan-Bunkering. Dan-Bunkering appoints Charles Simon Edwin as operations and compliance manager in Singapore  

Edwin transitions from sourcing role, bringing experience from physical supply operations and bunker trading.

Hamburg Express vessel. Hapag-Lloyd wins ZEMBA's second tender for e-methanol deployment  

Container line to deploy e-methanol on trans-oceanic route from 2027, abating 120,000 tonnes CO₂e.

Nuclear-powered multi-role icebreaker design render. RINA grants approval for Chinese nuclear-powered Arctic icebreaker design  

CSSC's multi-role vessel combines cargo transport and polar tourism with molten salt reactor propulsion.

Glander International Bunkering logo. Glander International Bunkering seeks two bunker traders for Singapore office  

Firm recruiting traders with 3-5 years of experience to join team in key Asian hub.

Hiring concept with puzzle pieces. Malik Supply seeks bunker trader for Fredericia office  

Danish company advertises role focusing on client portfolio development and energy product trading.


↑  Back to Top