This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Steel cutting ceremony of vessel with builder's hull no. CHB2059. Changhong International begins construction of first 11,400-teu LNG dual-fuel boxship for Oceanroutes  

Chinese yard starts work on first of 18 vessels in order from new customer.

Wee Meng Tan, GCMD. China’s renewable energy could fuel global shipping decarbonisation, says GCMD  

Maritime body sees potential for China to convert domestic wind and solar into green marine fuels.

OceanScore logo. OceanScore adds vessel activation controls for EU ETS and FuelEU compliance workflows  

Software provider introduces a feature allowing third-party managers to toggle vessel compliance status while preserving historical data.

Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) logo. MOL develops carbon inset and book-and-claim programme for alternative marine fuels  

Japanese shipowner details mechanism to verify, certify and fund use of biomethanol and other low-carbon fuels.

Deck view of Hafnia Larvik at sea. Hafnia orders eight MR tankers from Hyundai Heavy Industries for $405m  

Vessels scheduled for delivery between Q3 2028 and Q2 2029 at South Korean shipyard.

Sommer Mitchel, IBIA. IBIA appoints Sommer Mitchell as marketing and events coordinator  

Mitchell brings more than five years of experience to the marine fuels industry association.

Lazulite Ace vessel. MOL's 12th LNG dual-fuel car carrier makes maiden call in Singapore  

Lazulite Ace arrives in Singapore following delivery from Japanese shipyard in March.

Methanol bunkering demonstration at Kandla. Deendayal Port Authority completes India’s first methanol bunkering demonstration  

Kandla port conducts maiden methanol bunkering trial in 'step towards maritime decarbonization.'

Keel-laying ceremony of Viking Astrea. Fincantieri lays keel for hydrogen-powered cruise ship Viking Astrea  

Second hydrogen-fuelled vessel in Viking series scheduled for delivery in 2027 from Ancona yard.

T. Florya vessel. RMK Marine launches methanol-ready chemical tanker for Ditaş Denizcilik  

T. Florya, a 12,000-dwt vessel designed by Delta Marine, is launched by Turkish shipbuilder.


↑  Back to Top