This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Farrie Russ vessel. Ernst Russ takes delivery of second methanol-ready tanker  

Farrie Russ joins Ernst Russ’s fleet as the shipowner diversifies into tanker shipping.

Aerial view of the Port of Valencia. Valenciaport launches tender for second substation to double port's power capacity  

The Port of València's new €18.7m substation will support onshore power supply systems and growing terminal electricity demand.

Aerial view of harbour in Karaikal, Puducherry, India Study maps phased pathway for India to build a regional alternative marine fuel hub  

India could compete regionally across biofuels, methanol and ammonia if ports improve efficiency and reduce costs, study finds.

SEA-LNG and MAMII sign MoU. SEA-LNG and MAMII formalise technical partnership ahead of IMO methane talks  

Two organisations sign MoU to strengthen evidence-based input on methane emissions at the IMO.

China Zorrilla vessel. Battery-powered ferry China Zorrilla enters service in South America  

Ro-pax vessel now operating between Argentina and Uruguay, powered by more than 41 MWh of Corvus Energy battery systems.

Monjasa logo. Monjasa shuffles leadership across Asia and West Africa trading desks  

Morten Jacobsen steps down as managing director for Asia, with Simone Piredda relocating from Dubai to take the helm in Singapore

Tue Jensen, Burando Energies. Burando Energies appoints Tue Jensen as head of market risk  

Dutch marine fuels specialist bolsters its risk function amid international growth plans.

Anna Nash, Explora Journeys. Fincantieri floats out Explora V and marks coin ceremony for Explora VI  

Two ceremonies at Sestri Ponente shipyard advance construction of MSC's six-ship Explora Journeys fleet.

BP logo. BP advertises for senior physical bunker trader to oversee Europe and Africa marine business  

London-based trader is required to manage pricing, accounts and strategy across its marine fuels operation.

Ammonia fuel supply chain project signing. Seven Japanese firms join forces on ammonia-fuelled car carrier project  

NYK, K Line and five other companies plan to build four ammonia-fuelled car carriers alongside a dedicated bunkering vessel and supply chain.


↑  Back to Top