This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Verde Marine Energy and Sunoco LP logos. Sunoco and Verde Marine Energy announce commercial collaboration in ARA and UK bunker markets  

Partnership aims to combine Sunoco's Americas reach with Verde's Northern European supply platform.

CMA CGM Berenice vessel. CMA CGM methanol dual-fuel vessel makes first call at Malta Freeport  

Berenice is fifth in a six-ship series of methanol dual-fuel vessels being introduced by the French shipping group.

Everllence 16V175D engine render. Everllence's 175D engine wins offshore tug order from Türkiye  

Sixteen gensets are bound for four Rampage 6000-DE terminal tugs destined for Guyana.

NSD 75CC vessel design render. NSD wins BioMar fish feed vessel contract with hybrid propulsion design  

The NSD 75CC will feature a hybrid system combining electric and direct diesel-mechanical propulsion.

CCS type approval for All-scenario methanol single-fuel engine CCS awards type approval to China’s first all-scenario high-pressure direct-injection methanol medium-speed marine engine  

China Classification Society certifies SMDERI’s methanol single-fuel engine.

Carnot multi-fuel engine. Carnot tests engine on biodiesel as multi-fuel development programme advances  

UK engine developer Carnot has run its engine on biodiesel, adding to prior diesel and hydrogen tests.

IBIA logo. IBIA to hold mass flow meter training course in Rotterdam as industry reflects on first months of implementation  

One-day course covers MFM technology, regulatory frameworks and practical bunkering experience.

AQUBE battery system. Sunlight Group subsidiary lands first order for AQUBE liquid-cooled battery system for DLR research vessel  

A 48-metre floating technology platform will test hydrogen, hybrid and electric propulsion systems at sea.

Fure Vasa vessel. Furetank to name LBM-fuelled Fure Vasa as Swedish-flagged fleet reaches 105 ships  

Vessel to run primarily on liquefied biomethane (LBM) within the EU and is equipped for shore power connection.

Mitsui-Everllence 7S60ME engine. Mitsui E&S completes commercialisation of ammonia dual-fuel engines and fuel supply systems  

Japanese manufacturer says it is now ready to supply ammonia propulsion systems for actual vessels.


↑  Back to Top