This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Steel cutting ceremony for CMA CGM’s 8,400-teu LNG dual-fuel container vessel. New Times Shipbuilding begins steel cutting on 8,400-teu LNG dual-fuel boxship  

Chinese shipyard begins construction on vessel for CMA CGM with Lloyd's Register classification oversight.

ISCC Logo. Golden Island secures ISCC EU certification for sustainable marine fuel trading  

Singapore-based firm can now supply B100 biodiesel and green methanol with verified sustainability proofs.

Palace of Westminster, London. Uni-Fuels seeks bunker traders for London operations  

Nasdaq-listed marine fuel supplier recruiting for trading team to support global expansion efforts.

Uni-Fuels Logo. Uni-Fuels seeks bunker traders for Piraeus office  

Nasdaq-listed marine fuel provider advertises positions as part of expansion in Greek market.

Aland vessel. EU updates shipping company assignments under emissions trading system  

European Commission publishes revised list of administering authorities based on latest Thetis-MRV data.

WinGD LNG dual-fuel engine with personnel wearing safety helmets. WinGD promotes variable compression ratio retrofits for existing LNG dual-fuel engines  

Engine designer claims technology can reduce emissions and methane slip ahead of 2030 targets.

IBIA Board Elections 2026 Nominees announcement. IBIA announces 11 nominees for four board vacancies in 2026 election  

Voting opens 5 January with results to be announced at AGM on 9 February.

Bureau Veritas and C-Torq Marine Services sign MoU. Bureau Veritas and C-Torq Marine Services sign MoU for hydrogen energy system development  

Partnership aims to secure approval in principle for W-VOLT120 hydrogen-based maritime power system.

Global Ethanol Association (GEA) and SQ Group logo side by side. Jinan Shengquan Group joins Global Ethanol Association as founding member  

Chinese bio-based materials group joins new industry body promoting ethanol for energy security and emissions reduction.

ONE Satisfaction vessel. Ocean Network Express names sixth methanol and ammonia-ready container ship  

ONE Satisfaction is a 13,800-teu vessel scheduled for delivery in February 2026.


↑  Back to Top