This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Wed 19 Sep 2018, 09:37 GMT

NGOs hail Greenland HFO ban support


Clean Arctic Alliance applauds government's commitment to 'actively work for a ban'.


Vessel pictured off the coast of Greenland.
Image credit: Unsplash
NGO coalition Clean Arctic Alliance has hailed an announcement made by the government (Naalakkersuisut) of Greenland suporting a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships in the Arctic.

Commenting on the news, Kare Press-Kristensen, Senior Advisor to the Danish Ecological Council, a member of the Clean Arctic Alliance, remarked: "We applaud Greenland's government for speaking up for the much needed protection of the Arctic's nature and communities, by supporting the banning of the world's most polluting fuel - heavy fuel oil. After spending time measuring air pollution from cruise ships burning HFO in Greenland this summer, I'm very relieved that Greenlandic politicians support banning it."

In its statement, Greenland's government had said: "Naalakkersuisut has agreed to actively work for a ban on HFO in the Arctic, via the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO). The prohibition must cover both navigation and transport of HFO in the Arctic. Naalakkersuisut's position on the case has awaited an analysis of the socio-economic, environmental and climate consequences for Greenland of a possible ban on sailing on HFO in the Arctic.

"The Ministry of Nature and Environment states that the analysis is now available and, on this basis, Naalakkersuisut has decided to support a ban on sailing and transport of HFO in the Arctic. The analysis shows that a ban on sailing on HFO will be associated with a socioeconomic cost of approximately 8.1 million kroner [EUR 1.085 million/ $1.268 million] annually.

"A very important reason for avoiding HFO in Arctic waters is that marine casualties, which lead to waste of HFO in the marine environment, can have major environmental and economic consequences. HFO is very difficult and partly impossible to collect at low sea temperatures. Therefore, in case of major spill of HFO, there is a high risk that the oil will remain in the water for a long time or on the coasts that the oil may endanger."

In April 2018, the International Maritime Organization's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC72) agreed to move forward on developing of a Arctic ban on HFO - which is already banned in Antarctic waters.

MEPC72 directed one of its sub-committees (PPR6) - which will meet in early 2019 - to develop a ban on heavy fuel oil use and carriage for use by ships in the Arctic, "on the basis of an assessment of the impacts" and "on an appropriate timescale".

"Arctic summer sea ice is approximately half the extent it was in the 1970s and half the volume, while the region's strongest sea ice has broken up twice this year, for the first time on record. The use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic not only increases the risk of devastating oil spills, but it also generates higher emissions of black carbon, which exacerbate the melting of both sea and glacier ice," Clean Arctic Alliance stressed.

Sian Prior, Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor, added: "With MEPC73 coming up next month in London, Greenland's backing of a ban on the world's dirtiest shipping fuel in the Arctic is a timely encouragement for IMO member state governments to strengthen their commitment to quickly end the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters. The best thing IMO member states can now do for their domestic shipping industries is to send a clear signal for investment in alternatives to HFO. We're also calling on shipping companies crossing the Arctic - such as Maersk and COSCO - to show industry leadership and move towards cleaner fuels, and to commit to decarbonised forms of propulsion in the future."


Bjorn Hauschild, IBT Bunkering & Trading. IBT Bunkering & Trading appoints Sales Support Specialist  

Björn Hauschild joins from shipyard broker CombiTrade.

Haiyang Shiyou 301 ship-to-ship (STS) LNG bunkering operation. CLPe and CNOOC complete Hong Kong's first LNG bunkering of a pure car and truck carrier  

Ship-to-ship operation delivered around 2,600 cbm of LNG to dual-fuel vessel AICC Fenghuang.

Mercuria logo. Mercuria seeks senior sales and account manager for bunker delivery platform  

Role can be based either remotely or at one of its offices in London, Geneva, Athens or Las Palmas.

Molgas Energy logo. Molgas Energy Group appoints Riaan van Kralingen as head of clean fuels  

Van Kralingen will oversee the company's liquefied biomethane and EU allowance portfolios, succeeding Caspar Gooren.

GT Wings manufacturing facility. GT Wings launches compact AirWing S Jet Sail for smaller vessels  

Wind propulsion developer adds lightweight unit to AirWing range as first customer-ordered AirWing20 units near completion.

Cargo ship bow in dry dock. LR publishes retrofit guidance covering alternative fuels and energy-saving devices in one framework  

New Guidance Notes address LNG, methanol, ammonia, hydrogen, wind-assisted propulsion and air lubrication retrofits for existing ships.

Spirit of Toulouse fitted with rotor sails. LD Armateurs' Spirit of Toulouse fitted with six Norsepower rotor sails  

Six 35m rotor sails installed on the first of three methanol-capable ro-ro ships chartered by Airbus.

Steel-cutting ceremony for bunker vessel. Maritima holds steel-cutting ceremony for Cap Morgiou, first of two Petroineos bunker vessels  

Construction starts on bunker vessel able to carry conventional and low-carbon marine fuels, with delivery expected in early 2028.

MPA and SIBCON 2026 logos. Singapore launches series of measures at SIBCON 2026  

MPA announces LNG storage licences, digital bunkering grants and electric harbour craft incentives at 24th conference.

SIBCON 2026 pre-conference event. VPS outlines marine fuel standards and quality data at SIBCON 2026  

VPS's Rahul Choudhuri addresses Singapore's evolving fuel standards and the quality of conventional fuels and biofuels.


↑  Back to Top