BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry

« News Home
:: Monthly Archive

News Topics
:: Air Pollution
:: Agreements & M&A's
:: Alternative Fuels
:: BunkerBlog
:: Cargoes & Storage
:: Company News
:: Efficiency, Costs & Charges
:: Environment
:: Events
:: Financial
:: Fuel Quality & Testing
:: Lubes & Additives
:: Oil Spills
:: People
:: Port News
:: Projects
:: Regulation, Legal
:: Services, Products,Technology
:: Statistics & Research
:: Vessels

Regional Archive
:: Americas
:: Asia/Oceania
:: Europe
:: M.East/Africa

BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry
Home » News

BPA calls for 'credible evidence' on emissions as UK issues 'tight' air quality deadline

'Lack of credible evidence behind [Clean Air] strategy is concerning,' says British Ports Association.

Image credit: Pixabay

Updated on 23 May 2018 12:07 GMT

The British Ports Association (BPA) has responded to the UK government's Clean Air Strategy, published on Tuesday, claiming that the requirement for all major ports in England to develop air quality plans within the next year is a "tight deadline", whilst also calling on the government to produce "credible evidence" regarding shipping emissions.

Commenting on the May 2019 requirement for all major English ports to produce Air Quality Strategies setting out their plans to reduce emissions, including ship and shore activities, Mark Simmonds, Policy Manager at the British Ports Association, remarked: "This is a tight deadline, but many major ports will already be taking action on air quality, monitoring the sources or producing plans of action.

"We are pleased that Government has recognised that there is not a one-size-fits-all solution to this. Measuring the sources of emissions is always difficult and Government should recognise that ports are often centres of major industry and logistics chains and do not usually have direct control over nearby emissions sources."

Defending shipping's record compared to other forms of transportation, the BPA said it was "disappointing" that the government had not recognised it is cleaner to move goods by sea rather than by rail, air or road, and that it had "missed the opportunity to promote shipping as the cleanest way to move freight".

Simmonds argued: "Ports handle 95 percent of the UK's trade and moving freight by sea is still by far the most environmentally friendly way to facilitate global trade - as well as ensuring our economy continues to function and our food and energy supplies are secure. In comparison with other transport modes shipping is an efficient and environmentally sustainable option. Utilising the UK's hundreds of ports in supporting more coastal shipping has the potential to take thousands of lorries off of UK roads."

Call for evidence

The BPA also posited that the Clean Air Strategy "provides no evidence for its claim that international shipping emissions have a significant impact on air quality in the UK due to shipping lanes and engine operation while at UK ports".

"The Government have based some of their assumptions on shipping and port emissions on reports where the methodology has significant limitations, such as substantial guesswork around vessels' fuel type and sulphur content and assumptions on vessels' engines. There are also significant question marks around source apportionment in emission monitoring," the BPA said.

The association explained that during the time it has engaged with the UK government on air quality issues, it is "still yet to see much credible evidence set in proper context".

"The industry is keen to play its part and work with Government on improving air quality but this must be done holistically and using credible evidence," the BPA noted.

"[The] lack of credible evidence behind [the Clean Air] strategy is concerning," it added.

Related Links:

UK sets out plan to tackle maritime emissions
United Kingdom

Latest News:

IMO launches toolkits to tackle ship and port emissions
Bunker-saving JIT study presented at IMO HQ
Working group to finalize Initial Strategy programme for MEPC 73
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Bunker issues pack MEPC 73 agenda
Volatility around $80
Arkas and Sumitomo ink Turkey LNG bunkering accord
MEPC 73: Coalition calls for 'urgency' to adopt CO2 reduction measures
Concept ship shows IMO CO2 reduction targets can be met: Project Forward
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Tallink signs LOI to build second LNG-fuelled ferry
Will Saudi Arabia be able to replace Iranian oil?

Page Links:

Latin America
Middle East
North America
North Europe
South Europe
Index Summary
Price Highlights
Las Palmas
New Orleans
Rio de Janeiro
Latest News
Middle East
Air Pollution
Agreements & M&A's
Alternative Fuels
Cargoes & Storage
Efficiency, Costs & Charges
Fuel Quality
Lubes & Additives
Oil Spills
Port News
Services, Products, Technology
Statistics & Research
Contact & Terms
Contact Us
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Upcoming Events