BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry



« News Home
:: Monthly Archive

News Topics
:: Air Pollution
:: Agreements & M&A's
:: Alternative Fuels
:: BunkerBlog
:: Cargoes & Storage
:: Company News
:: Efficiency, Costs & Charges
:: Environment
:: Events
:: Financial
:: Fuel Quality & Testing
:: Lubes & Additives
:: Oil Spills
:: People
:: Port News
:: Projects
:: Regulation, Legal
:: Services, Products,Technology
:: Statistics & Research
:: Vessels

Regional Archive
:: Americas
:: Asia/Oceania
:: Europe
:: M.East/Africa


BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry
Home » News



Maersk COO explains unit cost at fixed bunker price, outlines fuel efficiency plan

Soren Toft offers further insight into the Ocean segment's bunker-related results.



Soren Toft, Chief Operating Officer at A.P. Moeller-Maersk. Image credit: A.P. Moeller-Maersk


Updated on 18 May 2018 09:21 GMT

A.P. Moller-Maersk's chief operating officer, Soren Toft, has offered further insight into the Ocean segment's unit cost at fixed bunker price.

In an analysis of the Danish conglomerate's results, Toft has provided a detailed explanation as to the reasons why the unit cost at fixed bunker price jumped $150, or 8.6 percent, to $1,895 per forty-foot equivalent (FFE) unit, including income from vessel sharing agreements (VSAs).

In its quarterly report, Maersk had provided a breakdown of the reasons for the 8.6 percent rise, explaining that 2.5 percent was related to adverse exchange rate developments, 3.4 percent to changes in the portfolio mix following the acquisition of Hamburg Sud in November, and the remaining 2.7 percent primarily related to higher terminal and feedering costs.

And Toft noted in his analysis that "two-thirds of it, so 6 percent out of the 8.6 percent is rate of exchange and the mix effect of Hamburg Sud. The rest is really within mainly the variable cost areas".

Toft went on to explain that whilst feedering costs were higher, third-party feedering carried out by Maersk is not reflected in the fixed bunker cost. Additionally, time charter (TC) expenses also affect feedering costs.

"We have higher feedering costs. You don't really see that in the fixed bunker because when we do third party feedering, the bunker cost is part of the rates that we pay. We have higher TC expenses, which also hits the feedering cost," Toft said.

Maersk's unit cost at fixed bunker price is calculated by assuming a bunker price of $200 per tonne, excluding intermodal but including transhipment hubs and time charter income.

Plan to improve fuel efficiency

As previously reported, Ocean's bunker efficiency fell by 3.4 percent to 972 kg/FFE from last year's figure of 940 kg/FFE. Part of the deterioration, Maersk said, was due to the increased capacity committed to carrying volumes from the slot purchase agreements which are not counted as loaded volume.

Referring to the figures, Toft explained that Maersk has a plan in place to improve this metric.

"We will push harder on fuel efficiency over the coming quarters, as we have now fully integrated the Hamburg Sud fleet since two weeks. We'll do number of things in procurement, a number of things on improving our empty cost base and a number of things on improving utilization where it makes sense," Toft said.






Related Links:

Maersk Ocean profit impacted by higher bunker costs... which surge to almost $1.2bn
Maersk targets 60% CO2 emissions reduction by 2020
Maersk Line recorded two incidents of sulphur non-compliance in 2017
Maersk Line spent $1.2bn more on bunkers in 2017; average price was highest since 2014

Latest News:

IMO launches toolkits to tackle ship and port emissions
Bunker-saving JIT study presented at IMO HQ
Working group to finalize Initial Strategy programme for MEPC 73
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Bunker issues pack MEPC 73 agenda
Volatility around $80
Arkas and Sumitomo ink Turkey LNG bunkering accord
MEPC 73: Coalition calls for 'urgency' to adopt CO2 reduction measures
Concept ship shows IMO CO2 reduction targets can be met: Project Forward
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Tallink signs LOI to build second LNG-fuelled ferry
Will Saudi Arabia be able to replace Iranian oil?




Page Links:

Prices
Africa
Asia
Latin America
Middle East
North America
North Europe
South Europe
Index Summary
Price Highlights
Commentaries
Futures
Prices
Antwerp
Busan
Fujairah
Houston
Istanbul
Kaohsiung
Las Palmas
Maracaibo
New Orleans
Piraeus
Rio de Janeiro
Rotterdam
Santos
Singapore
News
Latest News
Blogs
Archive
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
News
Air Pollution
Agreements & M&A's
Alternative Fuels
Cargoes & Storage
Efficiency, Costs & Charges
Environment
Events
Financial
Fuel Quality
Lubes & Additives
Oil Spills
People
Port News
Projects
Regulation/Legal
Services, Products, Technology
Statistics & Research
Vessels
Contact & Terms
Contact Us
Advertise
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Upcoming Events