BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry



« News Home
:: Monthly Archive

News Topics
:: Air Pollution
:: Agreements & M&A's
:: Alternative Fuels
:: BunkerBlog
:: Cargoes & Storage
:: Company News
:: Efficiency, Costs & Charges
:: Environment
:: Events
:: Financial
:: Fuel Quality & Testing
:: Lubes & Additives
:: Oil Spills
:: People
:: Port News
:: Projects
:: Regulation, Legal
:: Services, Products,Technology
:: Statistics & Research
:: Vessels

Regional Archive
:: Americas
:: Asia/Oceania
:: Europe
:: M.East/Africa


BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry
Home » News



Foreship predicts up to 30% of shipping will choose scrubbers

Company says a change in the pricing dynamic of higher-sulphur HFO will impact scrubber orders.



Image credit:


Updated on 18 Dec 2017 12:08 GMT

Shipowners weighing up their future marine fuel choices after the 2020 IMO 0.5 percent sulphur cap should also consider oil company expectations that up to 30 percent of commercial shipping will gravitate back to high-sulphur fuel oil by 2030, according to leading naval architecture and engineering consultancy Foreship.

With just over 100 ships running on LNG today, Foreship notes that the number in service is likely to be significantly below 500 by 2020.

At the same time, Foreship points out that while the 0.1 percent fuel sulphur content limit inside Emissions Control Areas (ECAs) has brought 1,500 scrubber installations, yard capacity could only grow that number to 3,000-4,000 by 2020. Most ships, therefore, look set to run on 0.5 percent sulphur content heavy fuel oil (HFO) and distillates to meet the cap.

Foreship Head of Machinery Department, Olli Somerkallio, explains that, post 2020, 0.5 percent sulphur content fuel will be blended from distillates and HFO of up to 2.5 percent sulphur content. Higher-sulphur HFO (HSHFO) can be used as a marine fuel where scrubbers are installed, but could also be a substitute fuel in gas power plants in former Soviet countries, or a coal substitute. This, he says, will change the pricing dynamic of HSHFO: to compete with coal, prices would have to be relatively low.

The implication, according to Foreship, is that HSHFO will return to favour as a marine fuel after the dust settles. "This will have a significant impact on the ROI of scrubbers in the future," says Somerkallio.

Experience

Foreship has experience in offering independent advice on adapting ships for new marine fuels and emissions abatement. Its reference list includes 34 exhaust gas scrubber retrofit projects to enable 13 cruise ships, 11 ro-pax ferries, nine ro-ros and one containership to burn HFO in ECAs.

Work includes conceptual design, technology and supplier evaluation, installation feasibility, the classification and basic design work needed for system integration, plus mechanical, piping, electrical systems and automation.

Foreship also covers engineering and structural design for equipment foundations and new tanks, as well as safety plans and stability updates, supervising detail design and installation during systems integration.

Foreship has advised customers to select multi-stream or in-line scrubbers, open-loop, closed-loop or hybrid systems. The high opportunity cost of losing sailing time in the cruise market has seen work planned underway, as well as for ro-ro ship projects work carried outindock.

"We have faced and overcome a broad range of installation challenges, including the fact that scrubbers eat into the revenue-earning space required for passengers or freight," says Somerkallio. "We are also very familiar with the equipment options in the market and supplier references."

As well as needing new pumping, water treatment and tank storage equipment, exhaust gas scrubbers demand considerable new pipework on board. Installing inline means that existing silencers need to be replaced with larger equipment, causing a space challenge for casing.

"Gaining this experience provides a wealth of independent experience that owners of cargo ships can draw on as the 2020 global sulphur cap approaches," says Somerkallio. "The track record is also long enough to understand that ships within the same project do not always benefit from the same equipment selection."






Related Links:

Wartsila to supply scrubber and engines for new cruise ship
Clean Marine secures EGCS contract for seven chemical tankers
NCL completes scrubber retrofits for two cruise ships
DFDS bookends century of ships with PureSOx scrubbers
HMM CEO evaluates 2020 fuel compliance options, says tech solutions should be shared

Latest News:

Concept ship shows IMO CO2 reduction targets can be met: Project Forward
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Tallink signs LOI to build second LNG-fuelled ferry
Will Saudi Arabia be able to replace Iranian oil?
North Sea Port sees biggest LNG bunker delivery to date
Gaseous fuels 'the only way forward': MAN CSO
Fluxys and Novatek sign Rostock lease for LNG terminal, bunkering
ExxonMobil launches new Mobilgard lube for high-speed diesel engines
Oil market closed higher following API draw
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
GTT and Dongsung Finetec sign MoU to market LNG Brick bunker tank
IMO 2020: Ship managers 'concerned' about impact on crew safety




Page Links:

Prices
Africa
Asia
Latin America
Middle East
North America
North Europe
South Europe
Index Summary
Price Highlights
Commentaries
Futures
Prices
Antwerp
Busan
Fujairah
Houston
Istanbul
Kaohsiung
Las Palmas
Maracaibo
New Orleans
Piraeus
Rio de Janeiro
Rotterdam
Santos
Singapore
News
Latest News
Blogs
Archive
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
News
Air Pollution
Agreements & M&A's
Alternative Fuels
Cargoes & Storage
Efficiency, Costs & Charges
Environment
Events
Financial
Fuel Quality
Lubes & Additives
Oil Spills
People
Port News
Projects
Regulation/Legal
Services, Products, Technology
Statistics & Research
Vessels
Contact & Terms
Contact Us
Advertise
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Upcoming Events